Thor vs A Planet

Started by dmills19 pages
Originally posted by h1a8
As Phil said, only if you look at the Gorr fight. But in general I say no

This means nothing. Either he can or he can't.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Why would you accept that feat but not the Gorr one where it was the equivalent of Thor's treating his face like Exitar's surface?

Because Thor had an AMP vs Extiar, his Belt of Strength. And Thor + Belt of Strength did all that damage by HIMSELF. Exitar contributed nothing to it because he wasn't actively fighting back, he wasn't even AWARE of Thor's presence even AFTER the attack.

Originally posted by zopzop
It makes perfect sense. See the Thor with Belt of Strength vs Exitar example I brought up earlier. With the amp, he hit Exitar so hard the entire planet shook and nearby mountain tops were reduced to rubble. I have no problem with Thor fans saying he would have busted a planet if he hit it directly with that blow.

But the point was he had an amp.

The OP didn't allow for amps as you described. So for the purposes of this thread, can he bust a planet with amped mjolnir strikes, yes or no?

Originally posted by dmills
This means nothing. Either he can or he can't.

Yeah, that logic is hilarious.

Thor can't destroy a planet except the time that he did. 😐

Don't know how anyone can type that kind of sentence with a straight face.

Originally posted by zopzop
Because Thor had an AMP vs Extiar, his Belt of Strength. And Thor + Belt of Strength did all that damage by HIMSELF. Exitar contributed nothing to it because he wasn't actively fighting back, he wasn't even AWARE of Thor's presence even AFTER the attack.

No one is saying that Gorr wasn't fighting back. But even if Gorr contributed the majority of the power (Lawlz worthy because the comic made explicit emphasis on Thor's striking), it's still evidence of Thor being able to bust a planet.

Originally posted by dmills
The OP didn't allow for amps as you described. So for the purposes of this thread, can he or can't he bust a planet with amped mjolnir strikes, yes or no?

What do you mean "amped" Mjolnir strikes? You mean striking a planet with Mjolnir? Then no, unless I see scans proving otherwise.

With his Belt of Strength which DOUBLES his strength, you can make the case and I wouldn't disagree with it because of the Exitar example I mentioned earlier.

Belt of Strength? doesn't it give him 10x ?

Originally posted by zopzop
What do you mean "amped" Mjolnir strikes? You mean striking a planet with Mjolnir? Then no, unless I see scans proving otherwise.

With his Belt of Strength which DOUBLES his strength, you can make the case and I wouldn't disagree with it because of the Exitar example I mentioned earlier.

That's how the OP described it. So I'm assuming that he means Thor charges it up with lightning or whatever, and bashes a planet mercilessly with it until it's busted. Simple.

So for the record, despite him busting up planets during this Gorr arc, you're stance is that... he can't do it?

How many hits is he allowed?

Originally posted by dmills
So for the record, despite him busting up planets during WITH GORR during this Gorr arc, you're stance is that... he can't do it?

With Gorr or a Gorr level opponent actively fighting back? Sure. By himself, unamped? No.

Originally posted by xJLxKing
How many hits is he allowed?

Man read the damn OP.

Originally posted by dmills
Man read the damn OP.

Does Thor have the capacity to bust a planet? No anti-matter blast, no god blast, no "Lorn Bolt", no energy projection attacks.

Only energy allowed in this thread are amped Mjolnir slams.

Zopzop... Discuss!!!

Use valid examples!!!

Okay so I don't see it specified. WTF DO YOU MEAN READ THE OP

Originally posted by zopzop
With Gorr or a Gorr level opponent actively fighting back? Sure. By himself, unamped? No.

Do you not realize how exceptionally stupid that sounds? If it requires a "Gorr level opponent" to get it done, then by proxy Thor isn't even putting out the majority of force required to bust the planets. "Gorr like opponent" is. For example, would Thor and Hulk going all out achieve the same effect in your version of the story?

Seriously, you're better off going with H1a8's dumb "it didn't happen except for that time that it did" argument, rather than going with the dumber "it's a shared feat that he didn't really even contribute much too" argument.

Originally posted by xJLxKing
Okay so I don't see it specified. WTF DO YOU MEAN READ THE OP

So you're asking me to tell you? Ok then. He's allowed a trillion amped strikes.

Originally posted by dmills
So you're asking me to tell you? Ok then. He's allowed a trillion amped strikes.
Then obviously, he is going to break it :/ without a doubt

I was arguing if Thor can destroy it in ONE HIT

Zopzop logic: If two equal numbers add up to a million, there's no proof that one of them is greater than 10.

Originally posted by dmills
Do you not realize how exceptionally stupid that sounds? If it requires a "Gorr level opponent" to get it done, then by proxy Thor isn't even putting out the majority of force required to bust the planets. "Gorr like opponent" is. For example, would Thor and Hulk going all out achieve the same effect in your version of the story?

Seriously, you're better off going with H1a8's dumb "it didn't happen except for that time that it did" argument, rather than going with the dumber "it's a shared feat that he didn't really even contribute much too" argument.


Gorr was a confirmed God Killer (slaying every God he came across with no exceptions) going toe to toe with THREE Thors and ultimately winning. The fact that Thor withstood that long against a foe of that level was impressive. You are seriously comparing Hulk to Gorr?

So you have someone that's Thor+ fighting Thor and causing a planet to buckle and a moon to shatter. It was a shared feat against a powerful opponent. I don't get what's so hard to grasp.

Originally posted by Endless Mike
Zopzop logic: If two equal numbers add up to a million, there's no proof that one of them is greater than 10.

Cute, now produce scans that show Thor busting a planet on his own unamped.

Originally posted by zopzop
Gorr was a confirmed God Killer (slaying every God he came across with no exceptions) going toe to toe with THREE Thors and ultimately winning. The fact that Thor withstood that long against a foe of that level was impressive. You are seriously comparing Hulk to Gorr?

So you have someone that's Thor+ fighting Thor and causing a planet to buckle and a moon to shatter. It was a shared feat against a powerful opponent. I don't get what's so hard to grasp.

Cute, now produce scans that show Thor busting a planet on his own unamped.

Zop. Please phucking re-read what I wrote, and then re-read your response. And do it very slowly.

Concerning this thread and some of the "arguments" made:

YouTube video

This. Just this.

Originally posted by dmills

Zop. Please phucking re-read what I wrote, and then re-read your response. And do it very slowly.


I read it, you're not understanding the response. Let me repost it for your convenience :
So you have someone that's Thor+ fighting Thor and causing a planet to buckle and a moon to shatter. It was a shared feat against a powerful opponent. I don't get what's so hard to grasp.

Is Gorr doing the majority of it? Why not? He was powerful enough to beat THREE THORS.