Originally posted by Inhuman
Why was Batman holding a gun? barker
Most likely a sonic cannon.
====
Been thinking about it, and tbh, I think the best thing they could do going forward is to go with the whole "Lex is different behind closed doors" thing, which I think they will anyway.
That, and to kill Superman at the end of the movie. Make using Doomsday actually worthwhile, and have Batman see first hand that Superman would sacrifice himself to save the world. Then the next solo-Superman movie, which we should get before JL, would be Superman's resurrection or whatever. Otherwise they're wasting a huge villain in what will basically be a team-up movie.
And I'm still wondering If those things are Parademons.
Originally posted by -Pr-
Most likely a sonic cannon.====
Been thinking about it, and tbh, I think the best thing they could do going forward is to go with the whole "Lex is different behind closed doors" thing, which I think they will anyway.
That, and to kill Superman at the end of the movie. Make using Doomsday actually worthwhile, and have Batman see first hand that Superman would sacrifice himself to save the world. Then the next solo-Superman movie, which we should get before JL, would be Superman's resurrection or whatever. Otherwise they're wasting a huge villain in what will basically be a team-up movie.
And I'm still wondering If those things are Parademons.
We won't. Though it could be cool if Superman was dead during JL part 1 only to be resurrected at the end.
Originally posted by ares834
We won't. Though it could be cool if Superman was dead during JL part 1 only to be resurrected at the end.
I thought MOS2 would be out sooner?
Eh, Superman should be there for the founding of the League, imo.
I still think there's a chance "Doomsday" is a mutated Bizarro, though.
Originally posted by Tzeentch
Gal Gadot looks like a super-model cosplaying as Wonder Woman. ermm.
Isn't that because she's exactly what you described?
Also whether or not this movie turns out to actually be good I still think its a risky move for Warner Brothers to have at least 3 of their big movies under one director.
Originally posted by -Pr-I thought it was horrific, tbh. I'd take Michelle Pfieffer's Cat Woman over Hathaway's any day, hammy as it was.
I think people should give her the benefit of the doubt. I mean, Hathaway looked awful as Catwoman, but her performance was pretty good imo.
That said it wasn't really Hathway's fault that the character was bad so much as it was the writers', and as far as body-type, there isn't as much of an obvious dissonance between Hathaway's build and Selena's... due mostly I think to the fact that she spends the entire role covered up anyway.