Originally posted by Esau Cairn
Point is, everyone's saying she's a horrible choice but no one's offering a better one.Who would you cast for WW?
Urm anyone but her. Like anyone. That one who plays Lady Sif would have been better. She did audition. Emily Blunt would have been a million times better. Jennifer Lawrence would have been much better (but probably not worth her cost). Kate Beckinsale would be better. Even Jessica Biel would be better.
Just about any actress I can think of would be better than Gal IMO. Honestly.
Doesn't even have to be famous. Just a decent actress who looks like a warrior.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Urm anyone but her. Like anyone. That one who plays Lady Sif would have been better. She did audition. Emily Blunt would have been a million times better. Jennifer Lawrence would have been much better (but probably not worth her cost). Kate Beckinsale would be better. Even Jessica Biel would be better.Just about any actress I can think of would be better than Gal IMO. Honestly.
Doesn't even have to be famous. Just a decent actress who looks like a warrior.
Jessica Biel would've been a goodpick had this movie been announced 6-7 years ago but not sure now. I do think that Jennifer Lawrnce would probably not be worth that much money though I still think that eithe Gina Carano or Christina Hendricks should've gotten the part.
But yeah I'm still not surw what Snyder/DC was thinking with that casting choice.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
So this is tracking at $140mill OW. I think it will do more than that, but not expecting anything like $200mill
Official tracking numbers don't come in until Thursday. That's where they really judge the interest and whatnot. Long term tracking is generally off. And at times the official tracking is too. Look what happened to Deadpool. Officially it was tracking 55-60 M OW, then it was bumbed up to 130 OW.
NY Times advertising in I Am Legend
Now in 2016!
I want my tickets!
TV Spot 12
'BATMAN V SUPERMAN' TICKETS GO ON SALE TOMORROW MORNING AT 7AM PT/ 10AM ET! pic.twitter.com/dimu72lJB2— Superhero Feed (@SuperheroFeed)
February 28, 2016
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Urm anyone but her. Like anyone. That one who plays Lady Sif would have been better. She did audition. Emily Blunt would have been a million times better. Jennifer Lawrence would have been much better (but probably not worth her cost). Kate Beckinsale would be better. Even Jessica Biel would be better.Just about any actress I can think of would be better than Gal IMO. Honestly.
Doesn't even have to be famous. Just a decent actress who looks like a warrior.
Sif? Have you see AoS? She is an absolutely atrocious actress. Wouldn't want JLaw either. But Blunt would be great.
Anyway, still not sold on Gal either. Guess we will see come March.
Originally posted by wakkawakkawakka
I still think that eithe Gina Carano or Christina Hendricks should've gotten the part.
There is more to acting then boobs.
Originally posted by Zack MJurassic World was tracking at a tad over 100 million and doubled that number.
Official tracking numbers don't come in until Thursday. That's where they really judge the interest and whatnot. Long term tracking is generally off. And at times the official tracking is too. Look what happened to Deadpool. Officially it was tracking 55-60 M OW, then it was bumbed up to 130 OW.
Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
How not? They're the title characters and it would mean bat fleck is not that great if gal gadot is better
Or it simply means Gal Gadot was great...
DP brought up a good example with Quicksilver. Sure, he stole the film but Magneto, Xavier, and Wolverine were all great as well.
Originally posted by ares834
It doesn't have to mean that at all. 😬
Yeah, people will always spin something negative out of a positive. It's the same as X-men. People were trashing the guy who played QUICKSILVER, yet he stole the show with a few scenes. It didn't mean the movie was bad or that the other actors couldn't carry a movie. 🙁
Originally posted by ares834
It could just as easily indicate that she is that good.It really doesn't speak about the quality of the film in anyway.
ok , well we will see if that claim, is true.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Well Quicksilver with a few scenes stole DOFP from Macavoy/Xavier, Fassbender/Magneto, and Jackman/Wolverine.So it can be done without it meaning the movie sucks.
There was also a rumour that Spider-Man steals the show in Civil War.
good point. ill guess we will see.
Originally posted by Esau Cairn
Funny.
First the Eisenberg hate.
Then he got some cred from the Turkish AirLines promo.
Really? Has he got cred for that airlines spot? News to me.
All he did was talk more quietly.
He still looked like a scrawny d-bag.
The main problem with Jesse as lex is his appearance. Eisenberg cant change that no matter how much he supposedly acts different in private.
His manerisms were the same , and his voice was similar other than the fact that he wasnt talking very loud and flamboyant.
Things Eisenberg cant change no matter the performance.
Originally posted by Zack M
I want my tickets!
Go request them from your H.R. dept 😬