Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Originally posted by juggernaut74
Jurassic World was tracking at a tad over 100 million and doubled that number.

True. Plus it seemed that there was hardly any buzz to JW either.

Remember, guys, there were only a few people who stated WW stole the show. In the grand scheme of things, it really doesn't mean anything. It's only the opinion of a few so far. She could still be horrible.

Originally posted by ares834
Sif? Have you see AoS? She is an absolutely atrocious actress.

As opposed to the Oscar performance Gal gave in Fast and Furious?

Sif's better than Gal IMO. But IMO it's not difficult to be better than Gal.

Originally posted by Zack M
That would be great, because haters like you and everyone else who doubted Gal would eat crow. 🙂

Again WW stealing the show doesn't mean Gal's performance is great. Could just be a really cool action sequence she's in.

Anyway Id be happy to eat Crow if Gal gives us a Great performance. Just find it unlikely that will happen.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Again WW stealing the show doesn't mean Gal's performance is great. Could just be a really cool action sequence she's in.

Anyway Id be happy to eat Crow if Gal gives us a Great performance. Just find it unlikely that will happen.

Or it could mean she did give a good performance. Ben commented that Gal was great as WW.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
As opposed to the Oscar performance Gal gave in Fast and Furious?

Sif's better than Gal IMO. But IMO it's not difficult to be better than Gal.

I agree with ares, Sif wasn't that great. She was rather forgettable, imo.

Originally posted by Zack M
True. Plus it seemed that there was hardly any buzz to JW either.

Yeah anything could happen tbh. And BvS certainly has hype, be it positive or negative. Think about it, all the haters are going to see it OW as well as the fans.

Originally posted by Zack M
Or it could mean she did give a good performance. Ben commented that Gal was great as WW.

Ben Affleck? Lol. What else would he say

Like I said I'll be happy for you to rub her great performance in my face. Just doubt that will happen.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Ben Affleck? Lol. What else would he say

Like I said I'll be happy for you to rub her great performance in my face. Just doubt that will happen.

He could have said nothing, but he brought it up himself. I'm not going to automatically assume Gal will be great, but I wouldn't be surprised, either, because she had to beat out other actresses to get the job. It wasn't just handed to her.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
As opposed to the Oscar performance Gal gave in Fast and Furious?

Sif's better than Gal IMO. But IMO it's not difficult to be better than Gal.

We, or at least I, haven't really seen Gal act so I can't comment on her ability. What I can say is Sif's actress was terrible and we dodged a bullet not getting her.

Emily Blunt is a fine actress but not feminine or "menacing" enough for WW.
Her last role, Sicario, she was scrawny, dwarfed by the rest of the cast & lacked on screen presence.

Originally posted by Esau Cairn
Emily Blunt is a fine actress but not feminine or "menacing" enough for WW.
Her last role, Sicario, she was scrawny, dwarfed by the rest of the cast & lacked on screen presence.

Originally posted by Mindset
Did you not see Edge of Tomorrow?

Yes. She was a great fighter I agree. In high tech armour & armed with futuristic weapons.

Where's the WW relevance there?

She was also the same stature as Cruise & he isn't a tall actor.
Blunt would look ridiculous standing next to Affleck & Cavil.

Again what's Gal bringing to the table that Blunt or Sif didn't have?

Blunt at least is a far better actress. Sif also seems better tbh.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Again what's Gal bringing to the table that Blunt or Sif didn't have?

Blunt at least is a far better actress. Sif also seems better tbh.

You won't know until you watch the movie. Saying who is better than the other without watching Gadot in action is a bit premature.

Beating Blunt is hard to top, though, but Jamie Alexander wasn't anything special to me.

Originally posted by Zack M
He could have said nothing, but he brought it up himself. I'm not going to automatically assume Gal will be great, but I wouldn't be surprised, either, because she had to beat out other actresses to get the job. It wasn't just handed to her.

They all say that when promoting their movie. He might have had to say something.

Clooney also bear out "all the other actors" when he got cast as Batman. Doesn't mean anything. Studios can make really stupid decisions sometimes.

Anyway we'll find out in under a month now 😛

Originally posted by Darth Thor
They all say that when promoting their movie. He might have had to say something.

Clooney also bear out "all the other actors" when he got cast as Batman. Doesn't mean anything. Studios can make really stupid decisions sometimes.

Anyway we'll find out in under a month now 😛

I'm getting my tickets tomorrow! 😱

I'm not waiting until Friday and they'll have Thursday showtimes.

Originally posted by Zack M
but Jamie Alexander wasn't anything special to me.

And Gal is?

At least with Sif we wouldn't get the accent.

Anyway we'll see soon enough 🙂

Originally posted by Esau Cairn
Yes. She was a great fighter I agree. In high tech armour & armed with futuristic weapons.

Where's the WW relevance there?

She was also the same stature as Cruise & he isn't a tall actor.
Blunt would look ridiculous standing next to Affleck & Cavil.

The suit had barely anything to do with her seeming like a badass, everyone in the movie were in mech suits and she stood out from them.

Tom Cruise looks like 6ft in every movie and he's like 3 feet tall. It's a movie, height wouldn't be an issue.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
And Gal is?

At least with Sif we wouldn't get the accent.

Anyway we'll see soon enough 🙂

Again, we haven't seen Gal in action yet.

And it looks like she won't have the accent from the line she delivered.