Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Started by -Pr-638 pages

Originally posted by tkitna
😘

The guy has pretty much failed at every level on the comic book based stuff. He's a problem.

Watchmen was great, I thought.

He makes more good movies than bad, imo.

Originally posted by One Big Mob
What's this shit about a billion anyway? Not too long ago that was a far fetched dream, now it's the expectation. A 600 million profit is the only way this can be a success? Get that shit out of here.

If this movie is truly shit, then it shouldn't even break even. And if it is shit, I hope it doesn't even cover production costs. Because that's what you deserve when you screw up badly. You don't deserve to make 900 million off a shitty movie and only be considered a failure because you didn't get 100 mill more.

This is some next level greed. A couple years ago Snyder making even 700 million would have guaranteed his stay in this series. Now the only thing fans are hoping for is a billion.

👆

If it's that bad, then they seriously need to rethink things. Not soldier on.

Originally posted by playa1258
Quanchi directing, Abhi writing, Robtard producing. Silent Master fight choreography.
My first act would be to fire abhi in front of his family.

Originally posted by tkitna
😘

The guy has pretty much failed at every level on the comic book based stuff. He's a problem.

I'd say its more that audiences just don't want what he's selling. The portentous, serious and brooding tone doesn't seem to connect as well as Marvels lighter comedy and action.

Also Watchmen is the greatest comic book movie of all time, screw the haters.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Firstly this movie needs to gross an estimated $800million to break even (after taking into account Marketing and Theatre cuts).

Secondly when the last 2 Batman films made $1Billion each, then the first meeting of Batman and Superman should easily make that. Trust me Snyder will go if this movie doesn't gross over a Billion.

😂 That's hilarious.

Also both Batman movies were rewatchable. If people don't like this movie this has a great chance for a flop.

If it does make over a billion and it's shit though, they should fire him anyway. You can't be ****ing up a movie like this... though they have some serious damage control to do.

Originally posted by quanchi112
My first act would be to set abhi on fire in front of his family.

Fixed.

looks like this movie's gonna be a real piece of shit. 👆

I just wanted it to be better than MOS 🙁

on another note , DCU's The Flash

Originally posted by Inhuman
I just wanted it to be better than MOS 🙁

on another note , DCU's The Flash

He keeps the long hair in the movie too...

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
looks like this movie's gonna be a real piece of shit. 👆
I tried warning the fanatics. They didn't want to listen.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
It won't be that bad. People like Schmoes are saying its Meh.

Still think it might be good though. Many fans have enjoyed it. Don't totally trust Critics/Reviewers who gave things like IM3 79%.

My prediction is it will be on par with Age of Ultron, maybe a bit better.

Could be. I liked MOS and that received a 56. RT can be deceiving.

Originally posted by Inhuman
I just wanted it to be better than MOS 🙁

on another note , DCU's The Flash

Wait... what 😐

Originally posted by Nephthys
I'd say its more that audiences just don't want what he's selling. The portentous, serious and brooding tone doesn't seem to connect as well as Marvels lighter comedy and action.

Also Watchmen is the greatest comic book movie of all time, screw the haters.

It has been shown time and time again that the GA did like MOS, though. The numbers and ratings support this. It wasn't as universally loved as Guardians or Avengers, but better than many Marvel movies and the ratings with the GA were around the same.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Watchmen was great, I thought.

He makes more good movies than bad, imo.

Its all opinion and that's cool. The thing about the Watchmen though is that he already had his script set out in front of him. All he had to do was copy the comic and he was successful in doing that. He changed the ending and I have to give him credit there because I liked the movie ending better than the comic, but in the whole scheme of things, I feel the Watchmen is a bad example of a movie when talking about Snyders success.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Dream team?

I was mainly kidding, because I doubt it will happen, unless this film bombs.

But Inhuman provided a link of WB trying to get Nolan, with George Miller and Yates as producers. On paper, that's one hell of a team.

DC ain't marvel and they can continue to watch on in envy to how it's done.

Laughs at DC fans.

As for the GA reviews, it seems the biggest problem is the editing. But the performances are fine across the board, other than a few wooden lines from Gadot.

It has now been over 24 hours since I experienced the movie in the IMAX midnight premiere over here in Sweden and it's quite a conflicting film to talk about. I think a lot of people who has seen it know what I am talking about when I say that for everything in the movie that was good - there was also almost always something in the back of my head telling me why it really doesn't work as well as it should.

What was apparent the most throughout the movie was the the editing is pretty damn terrible at times. Every time a scene seemed to go somewhere really interesting and I started getting invested - it cut to the next one. There's a lot of weird editing choices that takes out a lot of the emotional resonance that you're supposed to feel and I don't know if a second viewing will help me get the feel of the pacing a lot more or not. I find it hysterical that while a lot of people are saying the movie drags, I actually found myself wanting the scenes to go on for longer so I could properly take in what's happening. Now the first 5-10 minutes has its flaws in the execution too but it delivers a kick ass intro for the movie that gets you pumped to see what's about to come and while there was nothing in the movie to completely take you out of it... there's also nothing to get you invested because you never really feel the build up or that it's all going somewhere. When the two most famous superheroes are about to square off - you should be completely invested because the movie should have built up to that point... but it really doesn't. There's a lot of really good action in the movie I guess (in fact probably some of the best I've seen in a comic book movie) but it's really in service of almost nothing.

With that said, there's a lot to like. I didn't have a problem with any of the performances in the film (although Gal Gadot has some wooden line deliveries here and there) and I actually like what Eisenberg did with Lex Luthor and the way he's used in the story is one of the most interesting things about it once you piece it all together... and it would've been an absolute killer if they had just spent more time on it. Ben Affleck might be the best on-screen Batman we've ever had and there are a couple of "punch-the-air" moments which are a lot of fun. The music is excellent, the cinematography is gorgeous and the movie does have its fair share of jokes (mostly coming from Perry White).

I really want to see the extended R rated cut because I refuse to believe we got to see these scenes in their entirety. The movie has such a weird and disconnected pacing that you wonder who to really blame it on because I doubt Snyder is the only one responsible (and even if he is, the fact that no-one else noticed it before the final cut...).

Originally posted by tkitna
Its all opinion and that's cool. The thing about the Watchmen though is that he already had his script set out in front of him. All he had to do was copy the comic and he was successful in doing that. He changed the ending and I have to give him credit there because I liked the movie ending better than the comic, but in the whole scheme of things, I feel the Watchmen is a bad example of a movie when talking about Snyders success.

He's done other movies that have been good, but I agree he needs a good script to stop him ****ing things up. He's great at visuals and action, just not so much at everything else. 300, DOTD etc.

Originally posted by Zack M
I was mainly kidding, because I doubt it will happen, unless this film bombs.

But Inhuman provided a link of WB trying to get Nolan, with George Miller and Yates as producers. On paper, that's one hell of a team.

Really don't want Nolan back, tbh.

Why is Golgo using reviews to try and defend this movie when reviews are the whole reason this movie is getting shit on (besides the leaks)?

Originally posted by One Big Mob
Why is Golgo using reviews to try and defend this movie when reviews are the whole reason this movie is getting shit on (besides the leaks)?
He is a DC fanatic and one thing we know about DC fanatics they lack portions of their brains. They do the best they can.

Originally posted by One Big Mob
Why is Golgo using reviews to try and defend this movie when reviews are the whole reason this movie is getting shit on (besides the leaks)?

Critics doesn't always represent the GA, dummy. That wasn't even a professional review.