Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Originally posted by HulkIsHulk
- What was that thing Doomsday was bursting out of
- Stupid AI who first says what Lex says is agaisnt the orders of Kryptonian council but works when Lex says they are dead. Also, Kryptonians have doomsday creature making machines?
- why is lois trying to get the kryptonite spear? Why can't bats do it? It would've been way faster?
-- Why didn't superman throw the spear at doomsday? And why attack from the front? The other two didn't have any problem attacking from behind
-- Why is the idiotic president not being crucified?
-- Why didn't the kryptonian ship sentries come out and kill luthor like they did to lois?
--- Why does doomsadys attacks push supeman and wondy back but can't even crack the rock behind which lois is hiding?
Such a silly movie

It's because this movie was too intelligent for us audiences.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Well how would you measure that? Yes. All art is subjective.

But I guess that's what awards and oscars and critical acclaim are for. For people with supposed higher standards to place something like Inception in a different league to Mega Shark vs Giant Octopus. But it's still just their opinion.

Look I love the first Mortal Kombat. So just because it's a critical failure doesn't mean anybody can tell me I've got objectively bad taste for loving that film.

Something being art doesn't mean it can no longer be judged on it's merits.

Originally posted by WhiteWitchKing
It's because this movie was too intelligent for us audiences.

😂

I love how they try to explain their asses by making shit up about hidden meanings in the movie.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Something being art doesn't mean it can no longer be judged on it's merits.

Judging is different to objectively measuring. Different judges will give different scores.

Heck the first Bad Boys has only like a 44% on RT. Does that now mean Bad Boys is also an objectively bad movie?

Originally posted by WhiteWitchKing
At this point they are 4 movies in and they still haven't done it right. Like you said, Superman Returns was a flop and even critics didn't rate it high. It's 76% is a fresh but it flopped at the box office. Green Lantern flopped hard and that was suppose to be the start of their new universe. The start of thier universe gets push to Man of Steel which performed well financially but had mixed reactions from critics and audiences. Now their 4th big, non-Nolan, superhero movie is this travesty. It's not a flop but it is pretty bad. People enjoying it does not say much about the film. It sucked heard but I also enjoyed it. I'm not going to see it again though. BvS was killed off by both audiences word of mouth and critics (another kind of word of mouth).

It's likely because spiderman 3 the characters had solid reasons behind their behavior. The movie was terrible no doubt. Each critic have their own opinions. They all didn't sit down and decide which movie gets what rotten tomato meter rating. Plus after seeing Nolan's Batman and memories of Christopher Reeve's Superman, they get Man of Collateral Damage and the Dark muderous Knight fighting it out for lazy reasons is a huge turn off. Critics hated Superman in man of steel; is it any wonder they would hate Batman when they see Batfleck murdering crinimals and running them over with his batmobile? This is a PG13 movie and they have to make recommendations with that in mine alway since children will be seeing it. Spiderman 3 sucked but they didn't tear down their characters' personalities for the movie. They was crammed and sucked but BvS suffered from a lot more than Spiderman 3.

Fair points.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Judging is different to objectively measuring. Different judges will give different scores.

Heck the first Bad Boys has only like a 44% on RT. Does that now mean Bad Boys is also an objectively bad movie?

Labeling something as art doesn't make it immune to measuring/judging it's quality.

826 WW now. My 850-890 prediction seems about right.

More accurately 827.3 million.

Could have been better but could have been much worse. Like John Carter worse.

Originally posted by juggernaut74
More accurately 827.3 million.

Could have been better but could have been much worse. Like John Carter worse.

Does Disney own Jungle Book rights? I hear WB is planning one also with Christian Bale and Benedict Cumberbatch.

And Andy Serkis, yes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jungle_Book_(2018_film)

Originally posted by juggernaut74
Does Disney own Jungle Book rights? I hear WB is planning one also with Christian Bale and Benedict Cumberbatch.

Another Jungle Book movie is suppose to come out directed by Andy Serkis.

I think it might have been pushed back though or canceled.

Why would Disney let that happen?

Originally posted by juggernaut74
Why would Disney let that happen?

Its public domain. No one owns the rights.
They just cant take anything from the Disney animated movie or the new live action one. They can only take things from the original book or stuff they create themselves.

So it's like Dracula, Hercules, Thor, etc.

I get it now.

Originally posted by juggernaut74
So it's like Dracula, Hercules, Thor, etc.

I get it now.

Yeah. like your examples or Frankenstein , Alice in wonderland , etc.

YouTube video

Ben Affleck vs Chris Evans in a fist fight, who you got?