Originally posted by abhilegend
See how Adam is knocked out here while Thor attacks him with a double handed mjolnir strike to back?http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo326/OneDumbG0/Thor%20Fights/ThorvsSilverSurferAdamWarlock06.jpg
http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo326/OneDumbG0/Thor%20Fights/ThorvsSilverSurferAdamWarlock07.jpgFour issues later
Is this a serious post?
Originally posted by abhilegend
Compare Adam wrecking Power Girl at 1/3 of his power by a thunderclap to any showing thor has against top tiers.Nope. Felled again that for once.
Compare Thor beating up an Ulik who was thousands of times more powerful to that.
But you're so certain that Adam is more durable then Thor. At least admit you have no confidence in your position if you aren't willing to debate their durability in a conclusive environment.
Originally posted by wolverinos
of course with all the years thor has been on the market, plus a major hero he got tons of comics with showings, among those tons of comics there is no doubt in mind he got some crazy feats.
however the majority and the standard of his feats is not what you are trying to portray here.
So what, any showing I post is automatically invalid because you think it's a high end feat? That's a nice little safety net you've constructed for yourself. Unfortunately that's not how it works. Especially since you go on to bring up World War III below. And at the same time bring up Tutinax and go in the completely opposite direction.
Originally posted by wolverinos
yes, many brawling fights and specially withthe way thor is writen for the past years ,dont end up very well for him.
thor doesnt have the durability to match black adam as simple as that.
adam took an angry superman punches , took on half of DC heroes roster.
Thor will never be able to accomplish something like that.
hulk beats thor to pulp when the brawling extend.
the U foes took him down, in almost every brawl you see thor bleeding and low - mid heralds are able to hang with him perfectly fine.
this is not the case with black adam, black adam is a a totally different beast when it comes to brawling, i am sorry but please read both adam comics and thor comics without any biased opinion and understand the most obvious.what? i am sorry what skills did thor present in H2H? he brawls out like the hulk or any other dumb brick.
what? when he kicked hercules in the balls? when he was human and showed some level of skills?
again black adam demonstrated dirty fighting techniques in most of his fights.
ripping off body parts, going for lethal spots in the physique, all those indicate a deep knowledge of fighting and will to utilize that on the field.
if thor was able to fight the way adam does, hulk tutinax and many others would go down within several blows.you advice me to educate myself? i advice you to look at things in a non biased manner, because even if you read comics for years and got knowledge, being biased to this point makes you look like a novice.
Thor has better durability feats then Adam, as simple as that. Claiming he can't match Adam is ridiculous.
😂 You want to talk about averages but bring up World War III then try and lowball Thor (Because Hulk would f*ck up Adam in an extended brawl) as evidence. Typical nonsensical tactics based on ignorance.
You need to stop treating Thor like he's Colossus in comparison to Black Adam. It's starting to get annoying. Are you going to read a respect thread or pick up some Thor books? I can barrage you with scans alternatively but then you'd just disappear and all these posts will be pointless in the end.
Yes, Thor has demonstrated more skill then Adam has. And ferocity =/= skill. Not to mention that Thor can be just as brutal as Adam.
This isn't some sissy JSA members, if Adam fights dirty, Thor will fight dirty. Thor's a viking and has been honed by many years of brutal and violent combat that would make Adam wet his pants. He's dismembered opponents and done all the little things that get you hard about Adam. Except he's also shown skill in fighting. In the last issue of his recent series, he bit out Gorr's eyeball btw. 😐
Originally posted by wolverinos
and between you and me? we both know that A: the scans you can present are 1% among his entire showings.
B: 99.5% of the scans will be from the 70s or 80s , because we know very well thor is no longer what he was portrayed in the past for a very long time now.
Again, not going to work on me. If you make a claim and I post counter scans, you don't just get to ignore them because you think they are high end showings.
Thor's feats in the last five years are better then anything Adam's done.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Compare Thor beating up an Ulik who was thousands of times more powerful to that.But you're so certain that Adam is more durable then Thor. At least admit you have no confidence in your position if you aren't willing to debate their durability in a conclusive environment.
Nah, its just that I know what you're up to.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Hyperboles ftw.Nah, its just that I know what you're up to.
Even assuming that Ulik was powered up to 1/10th of the degree that he claimed (Which of course is ridiculous), it still far more impressive then the Adam feat.
What am I up to? Tell me my grand scheme. I challenged you to a battle zone. It's very simple, we pick judges and make our cases. Stop passing off Adam having superior durability as fact if you don't have enough confidence in your position to back it up.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Compare Thor beating up an Ulik who was thousands of times more powerful to that.But you're so certain that Adam is more durable then Thor. At least admit you have no confidence in your position if you aren't willing to debate their durability in a conclusive environment.
Game, set, match.
Originally posted by wolverinos
wow, you just said in 2 lines what i was trying to tell with all my posts. good jobwe saw what happened when thor was trying to go up against a team.
the U FOES? yep a team of high metas - low heralds... and it ended up very very bad for thor.adam is one shotting heralds and wrecking teams, thor in a physical confrontation is not in this league.
How did he do against Galactus when he literally plowed through his head? Thor would absolutely whop Black Adam's arse, hammer or not.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Considering Blood and Thunder Thor was punked by an injured BRB, that's giving Thor too much credit. The sissy couldn't knock out Adam Warlock with a two handed charged mjolnir attack to the back. Adam was knocked out by a rock three issues later.😂
Thor was fighting Celestials when D.C. was ripping off Dr. Spock. Thor would easily rip his ears off and give them back to Namor before forcing him to call a lighting strike that Thor would redirect at BA's little ball sack.
Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
Thor was fighting Celestials when D.C. was ripping off Dr. Spock. Thor would easily rip his ears off and give them back to Namor before forcing him to call a lighting strike that Thor would redirect at BA's little ball sack.
Thor's a biter. It's an attribute that goes very well with his long locks...
😛
Originally posted by wolverinos
well you believe thor to be overall more powerful and i believe otherwise.
just because thor got more different abilities doesnt conclude overall power.
adam may have only physical attributes and lightning but i dont see thor being able to damage adam badly, nor do i see adam giving thor a chance to use his overall different powers on him, without adam being right in his face and forcing him to melee fight.as for a brawl? i am not stating that black adam is much more physically superior to thor, however eventually he wins them all.
adam physically is stronger, he is faster and more durable than thor no doubt.
thor would easily fall to the things adam takes on average, i am not talking about high end feats i am talking about their standard.
thor is known to not have very good durability when it comes to brawling out.
also thor has no real skills aside of brawling, see fights vs tutinax, see fights with hulk, just plain and simple brawling.
adam is on another level as fighter and he is actually using fighting strategies.
the hammer is a buff but it never really made too much difference, watch 90% of thors melee fights they are alway done with his hammer and many of them he loses in the first place.overall i dont see thor physically being able to put black adam down, however adam can do it.
Ask Sentry's ghost about what the hammer can do.
For the record, the U-Foes, and especially Vector are incredibly powerful. They attacked him with all they had to the point they were drained IIRC. Not to mention all the Hood goons were amped by the Norn Stones and it took a bunch of them including Sentry to temporarily take down Thor. But whatever, facts like that are irrelevant
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Even assuming that Ulik was powered up to 1/10th of the degree that he claimed (Which of course is ridiculous), it still far more impressive then the Adam feat.What am I up to? Tell me my grand scheme. I challenged you to a battle zone. It's very simple, we pick judges and make our cases. Stop passing off Adam having superior durability as fact if you don't have enough confidence in your position to back it up.
Nope.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
For the record, the U-Foes, and especially Vector are incredibly powerful. They attacked him with all they had to the point they were drained IIRC. Not to mention all the Hood goons were amped by the Norn Stones and it took a bunch of them including Sentry to temporarily take down Thor. But whatever, facts like that are irrelevant
