Optimus Prime vs. King Kong (H2H only)

Started by focus4chumps4 pages

🙂

OK, fucachumps.

Question 1: a 50 kg car moving at 20 m/s collides in an ellastic collision with a 100 kg stationary truck in a closed system. Determine their final velocities and how much net momentum difference there is between the initial and final system.

Question 2: a 50 kg car made out of indestructible adamantium moving at 20 m/s collides in an ellastic collision with a 100 kg stationiary truck in a closed system. Determine their final velocities, and how much net momentum difference there is between the initial and final system.

Let's see if you get my point here.

keep tapdaning around the fact that you were proven wrong.

non-magical sabot rounds injuring TF

as if you know what the **** you're talking about when you mention sabot as it only applies to artillery, you ignorant clownshoe. but keep saying 'sabot' because it sounds cool.

It's OK, fucachumps, you can take some more time if you need. Maybe you can even ask Sadako over there for some help.

I love how you're so proud about your knowledge of military jargon, but never bothered to learn middle school physics, lol.

"kong's ability to absorb impact force has nothing to do with physical strength. also only transformers' weak points are off limits in scrutinizing." clown.

multiple BMG 50 rounds:

single ACR Round:

you will never get to disqualify physical strength from the topicdf [/B][/QUOTE]

Still don't understand physics 101, eh? Your point is 100% irrelevant, lol.

BTW, these are the sabot rounds that took off scorponok's tail:

It survived those; damaged, but intact.

Tell me Kong could.

How much of those are the actual 'slug' cause the damage around Scorponok's tail didnt look like the arse end of those in size, IIRC.

What does all of that have to do with a H2H beat em up? I've been convinced of one thing from the other thread, and that is in a straight H2H match up, Kong is likely the superior of the two. I simply can't see or believe that he would have difficulty in tearing a truck the size of Prime apart in mere seconds. I could be wrong, but I think Kong would tear Prime apart in this one. If Prime had all of his weapons then I could see him taking this, but it isn't, and he shouldn't be able to.

who needs kong when a human can just shove a grenade in his eye. 🙂

lets hear it for invincible future metal! 🙂

i smell 'prime vs mcclane' 🙂

Originally posted by Master Han
BTW, these are the sabot rounds that took off scorponok's tail:

It survived those; [with part of its tail missing].

Tell me Kong could.

😆 😆 😆

👆

But Scorponok ummmmm wasn't actually intact. 😕

That'd be like saying Kong totally survived the movie alive.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
But Scorponok ummmmm wasn't actually intact. 😕

That'd be like saying Kong totally survived the movie alive.

Fixed: I corrected his post in my post.

and what case does this support?

that scorpinok did NOT die by having his tail blown off?

given his evidence, scorpinok would have been killed instantly if they were impacting the body or head.

unless anyone has evidence of TF's surviving DIRECT body hits from these super cool 105 mm sabots? .

if not then its yet more irrelevant glittery posturing via military-tech name-dropping. 🙂

There is none. IIRC

Maddox was shooting Blackout with far less and killed him, firing whilst sliding under him. As a couple of rockets happened to shoot him too. YouTube video

LOL, I say to thee.

Originally posted by the ninjak
What is Prime's peak strength feat?

Casually snapping trees like they were twigs by simply walking through them. Casually picking up trees like they were flowers. Kong in comparison needed to smash through a tree to break them.

Prime and Megatron also consistently smash THROUGH buildings and bridges. Kong (IIRC) smashes the side of buildings but doesn't go through them.

Prime and transformers also have displayed far better durability feats.

Also, although Kong is bigger, there's no evidence to suggest that he's actually heavier than Prime.

grenade launcher to the balls? 😂

wait ow 🙁

Originally posted by FrothByte
Casually snapping trees like they were twigs by simply walking through them.

Casually picking up trees like they were flowers. Kong in comparison needed to smash through a tree to break them.

Prime and Megatron also consistently smash THROUGH buildings and bridges. Kong (IIRC) smashes the side of buildings but doesn't go through them.

Prime and transformers also have displayed far better durability feats.

Also, although Kong is bigger, there's no evidence to suggest that he's actually heavier than Prime.

your implication that kong could not accomplish these things is baseless and thus easily dismissed.

cherry-picking strength feats unique only to prime's circumstanes while ignoring the same for kong is a completely fallaious rule to impose, as well as juvenile

Originally posted by FrothByte

Also, although Kong is bigger, there's no evidence to suggest that he's actually heavier than Prime.

Your 1st part is subjective opinion.

2nd: Yes there is. Kong is 20-50 tonnes
Prime is 15-17 (as is a Peterbilt truck).

('No mass shift' is the rule for the Tfs in these movies, except for the Allspark, of course)

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Your 1st part is subjective opinion.

2nd: Yes there is. Kong is 20-50 tonnes
Prime is 15-17 (as is a Peterbilt truck).

('No mass shift' is the rule for the Tfs in these movies, except for the Allspark, of course)

20-50 tonnes is a very wide guestimate. Where did you get these figures from? Why such a huge spanning range? If you were so sure of his weight, why not be more specific about it? Otherwise this is just guessing.

Also, assuming that Prime is as heavy as a normal semi truck would be to assume that Prime is made of the same materials as a normal semi truck. That would be false, because a semi crashing into a tree or through buildings would be seriously damaged. Prime crashed into both without a scratch, suggesting that he's made of something more durable than what a semi is usually made of. Meaning that his weight can also be quite different.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
your implication that kong could not accomplish these things is baseless and thus easily dismissed.

cherry-picking strength feats unique only to prime's circumstanes while ignoring the same for kong is a completely fallaious rule to impose, as well as juvenile

Stating that Kong can accomplish something that has not been backed by feats is a no limits fallacy.

Besides if you're using that logic, then we can use the same logic and say: Why do you think Prime can't do the same feats as Kong can? What makes you think Prime can't rip a T-rex's jaws apart?

cherry-picking strength feats unique only to Kong's circumstanes while ignoring the same for Prime is a completely fallaious rule to impose, as well as juvenile