Are we of the opinion that just because something can destroy stars off panel, that its most basic attack on panel must be capable of destroying stars too?
In that case, here's ****ing Faith taking a star destroying attack:
http://i43.tinypic.com/2ymeusg.jpg
Next time we see her:
http://i40.tinypic.com/23r1wjk.jpg
And the end of the battle, after pretty much everyone has taken these attacks (only Billy took a different attack in the tesseract bomb, which was obviously more powerful than the beams he took):
http://i39.tinypic.com/28mcvx3.jpg
The Void Hound could destroy stars, but not with any of the attacks we seen on panel. They could have whittled them down, they could have had one ultimate attack that isn't viable against moving opponents. But assuming their most basic attacks can destroy suns? lol
Anyway, here's actual named attacks against a planet:
http://i40.tinypic.com/ornkzk.jpg
The attack they took was closest to the holocaust beam if even. If they could just destroy stars with basic quick attacks, then they'd have no reason to use anything else ever. And they wouldn't have bombs that could turn Captain Marvel inside out, which forces the League to resort to throwing asteroids at the bombs, yet they feel completely comfortable continuing not to defend against the STAR DESTROYING BEAMS
It's not a bad feat of course. But why it's getting overblown, and why Superman is relevant here... I don't have the foggiest.