Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Dark Transfer is an ancient Force application; it is not a new invention since its knowledge goes back to era of Force Wars. So I find it hard to believe that most prominent practitioners of the dark side would have no knowledge of it or do not knew how to handle it. Sith (of True Sith Empire) were specially extremely knowleageable in the ways of the dark side. Heck, even Revan acquired enormous wealth of dark side knowledge during his short reign as Sith.
No it's not. Cade Skywalker was the first user of Dark Transfer. Krayt uses knowledge of older sith healing to improve it, but he's the only other known user.
It's a technique created during the Legacy era. Quite notably, not even Sidious achieved it, and we all know how much he was into life extension.
So we can safely assume that Krayt can kill anybody with this technique? Sidious? Luke? Vitiate? Yoda? Plagueis? Marr? Nihilus? Decimus? Revan? Abeloth? The Father? The Son? The Daughter?
Perhaps not Abeloth or the Ones, since they're freaky... though, maybe.
But the mortals? Sure, as long as he gets a good hand on them, of course they'd die.
A galaxy which had been previously ravaged by lot of wars and Abeloth's exploits? I am not impressed.
War often makes force users stronger, and few of the top Jedi were killed in those conflicts, so they retained their skill to pass on. The New Jedi Order was a very strong era for the Jedi that accumulated knowledge from many sources and eras and had incredible combat skills.
Also, there was time to heal, the Jedi order was about ten thousand strong (trained by Luke's impressive students) when the Sith struck. Plus there was the Imperial Knights as well.
It was obvious that fall of competitors such as Vader, Sidious, Kun, UnuThul, Caedus and Abeloth would pave way for one of the "lesser ones" to exploit a galaxy in turmoil. I am not trying to assert that Krayt is a looser but he doesn't appears to be among the most capable Sith Lords of all times.
Do you not know that Legacy takes place well after Caedus's rise? It wasn't in turmoil before the One Sith made it in turmoil, Caedus's time was most of a century past and the turmoil had long since died down. And the stuff after Caedus hasn't caused major galactic chaos.
The Lost Tribe were lesser ones who struck when things were in turmoil caused by others, and they failed. Krayt did not wait for an opportunity, he made it, and he succeeded.
When Luke met Krayt, he could tell he was too strong to be of the Lost Tribe, and talked about the balance between himself and Krayt serving as the new "Ones". Luke Skywalker gives him props.
You just seem to be assuming he's weak based on... well, nothing that I can find, just era bias.
He's both conquered the galaxy and achieved force powers that no Sith before him did.
I don't recall that anybody (a Sith Lord in particular) who succeeded Sidious was ranking his predecessors.
You're trying to rank Krayt low based on him not being ranked by people who existed before him. Excuse me for pointing out the inconsistencies.
Wyyrlok lost to Krayt in a very close contest. Also, I am not sure if Sith during Andeddu's time were remarkably strong or something.
Wyyrlok, a Legacy sith, lost to Krayt in a close combat. Andeddu lost to Wyyrlok in a flat-out stomp.
And Andeddu's power and sorcery was famous enough that Dooku was talking about it six thousand years later, and people often mention how the Sith of the ancient empire were powerful (Kreia certainly does, and we know other strong sith from it).
Andeddu was strong enough during his time of the Empire that the other Sith had to gang up on him to beat him.
Now, obviously, Andeddu's era wasn't one of the strongest... because even the best of his era was quite below the top Legacy era characters. When the best of an era is well outmatched in their own specialty, that's a pretty good gap.
So the galaxy was perfectly healthy after all of the previous wars and Abeloth's exploits? Give me a break.
Caedus's death: 41 ABY. Krayt's rise: 130 ABY.
That is 89 years, multiple generations. And Abeloth didn't actually cause much galactic damage, in large part thanks to Krayt.
Now, if Krayt had taken over in ABY 60-70 like in Jacen's vision, you'd have more of an argument... though in that timeline Jacen wouldn't have fallen and become Caedus anyway.
No, in times of Vader, Sidious, Kun, UnuThul, Caedus, Abeloth and vice versa.
Time of Vader- obviously not near his full power, still a Jedi. Beat Aurra Sing and Anakin Skywalker in fights. Known to be an era with high lightsaber skill.
UnuThul- The leader of a minor conflict. So? Krayt was training under XoXaan at the time, and had he not been, hardly worth his time. Krayt had no reason to get involved.
Caedus- Was the actual reason Caedus turned Darkside. Jacen saw a vision of Krayt conquering the galaxy and turning his daughter to the dark, and thus turned Sith to try and prevent it.
Abeloth- Beat Abeloth with Luke. Seriously, how can you can call that no impact when he and Luke double-teamed the big bad and took her down and his presence was crucial to the victory?
Kun- .... 4,000 years before he was born.
Legacy- Conquered the galaxy, the second largest conquests of any Sith. The only ones with conquests that can be compared are Revan, Vitiate, Ruin, and of course the champion of the category, Sidious. Every last one of them exceptional.
Your standards are weird.
----
Krayt's the most powerful of an era that stands well above some other eras, and people like Luke and Jacen saw him as quite powerful even in his pre-resurrection period.
Malgus is from a highly competitive era, sure, but he's very much not the most powerful in it, so it really doesn't say as much as you think it says. Malgus is not Vitiate, and while Krayt's not Vitiate either, as a sith both his power and especially impact stand up there.
Krayt's impact exceeded Malgus's by a lot.