Originally posted by ODG
If you can't address what is actually being said, you shouldn't post at all. BTW, nobody has to prove that IM cannot be hurt by anyone. It's not on us to prove the negative. So make an actual argument instead of relying on a transparent fallacy. Nobody said it was. So please try addressing something actually stated. Moreover, nobody has to prove that. It's not on us to prove the negative. So drop the negative proof fallacies and make an actual argument. Show Batman hurting something more powerful than the Thorbuster armor which was a match for King Thor. Nobody said he would prep to become invulnerable to all harm. So please try addressing something actually stated. Moreover, nobody has to prove that. It's not on us to prove the negative. So drop the negative proof fallacies and make an actual argument. Except when most Iron Man armors have shown to be impervious to acid, EMP-shielded, immune to hacking due to sealed systems, has armor based on nanotech itself (and has used nanotech disassemblers posted previously), are capable of absorbing/redirecting incredible energy outputs even from High Heralds, Trans, and Abstract characters, and are basically beyond what Batman is normally capable of on his own.And since you haven't really shown sh1t of what Batman would do, your generally witless platitudes and proclamations are worth as much as the electrons wasted by your pointless post. Of course, when you actually try to mention things from comics, you only worsen your case. Follow if you can: Which weapons and devices would damage the Thorbuster or Phoenix-Killer or handle any of the super-weapons ad WMDs previously posted? Brother MK I was hacked by Maxwell Lord and then enhanced with an evolving sentience by Alexander Luthor. It eventually became Brother Eye. Batman only built Brother MK I. Which was built for the sole purpose of monitoring superhumans and nothing else. Trying to invoke the surveillance satellite that was hacked and taken over by others which caused Batman serious problems as if it were some "trump card" is both ironic and moronic.
And the O.M.A.C.s were not invented by Batman either. So maybe you might want to read the comics. Because arguing that Batman would use Brother Eye or O.M.A.C.s makes about as much sense as us arguing Stark would use Ultron or Phalanx drones. Because a suit that can mimic JLA abilities in an extremely limited and cost-inefficient manner that has given the Bat-family problems on-panel is supposed to be able to challenge the Thorbuster or Phoenix-Killer armors. I'm sorry, was this supposed to be another "trump card" or a joke? I'll laugh either way. Once again, nobody said he would. So please try addressing something actually stated. Moreover, nobody has to prove that. It's not on us to prove the negative. So drop the negative proof fallacies and make an actual argument.
Or don't.
👆 👆 👆 👆
Originally posted by janus77
This thread is napalm for the brain. It's banned under all CBW* treaties. It's Weaponised Mass Delusion ✅.That's Comic-Book-Wanking.
The only ones wanking are the ones saying Batman doesn't stand a chance. (Iron Wanking o.0)
Batman BFR's Ironman and his gear with a teleport tube.
Originally posted by Batman-PrimeTry making an argument about comics instead of boring us with your own warped sense of how KMC discussions work. But, yes, let's give you one last chance to actually start addressing what's beng said in this thread about the comics:
So, you want to start a dialogue and exchange opinions? If you stay polite I am more then willing to help youDo you wonder why you are so defensive now? Think about it. Nobody said or implied it? Well, we will see. The fallacies are more common on the Marvel side. However you can take both sides, DC and Marvel into account, blame both sides instead of ignoring and blaming the one you are against. But that would mean to be honest with yourself.
Originally posted by Batman-PrimeAnd already you can't read. Read what I actually typed. Again. Then think about what I typed and deal with it directly. Because your inability to address anything directly stated in this thread has already been pointed out and ridiculed. I gave you a choice: Try addressing something actually stated and make an actual argument. Or don't.
Ok, you point is now that nothing short of an Being of King Thors level is capable of hurting Ironman?
You've chosen the latter. There's no constructive discussion to be had with the willfully ignorant or the impotently trollish.
Originally posted by OdekahnYou never even started. /shrug
Also, I am NOT finished with this.
Originally posted by ODG
Try making an argument about comics instead of boring us with your own warped sense of how KMC discussions work. But, yes, let's see how you actually start addressing the comics: And already you can't read. Read what I typed. Again. Then think about what I typed and deal with it directly. Because your inability to address anything directly stated in this thread has already been pointed out and ridiculed. I gave you a choice: Try addressing something actually stated and make an actual argument. Or don't.You've chosen the latter. There's no constructive discussion to be had with the willfully ignorant or the impotently trollish. You never even started. /shrug
Dude, make a point or find something that makes you happy. I dunno, man. Plant a flower or something. Lol
Prozac 👆
*I'm jk ODG, I like you cranky. You have a necessary Scroogeness about you.
Originally posted by OdekahnUnfortunately, I found absolutely nothing redeeming in your posts in this thread. 👇
Dude, make a point or find something that makes you happy. I dunno, man. Plant a flower or something. LolProzac 👆
*I'm jk ODG, I like you cranky. You have a necessary Scroogeness about you.