Re: How Superman ruined Shazam movie
Originally posted by quanchi112
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/How-Man-Steel-Stopped-Shazam-Movie-40868.htmlDc just making silly decisions and preventing other dc heroes from taking the spotlight.
The original shazam movie had private investors involved , the total was over 300 million. Shazam actually had better financial backing then the superman movie, whatever happened to the backing I have no idea.
I agree with you Quanchi its all about superman and batman. In the marvel universe the spotlight is more evenly shared, I think this is the reason marvel gets more of a variety of fans where D.C. caters to the much younger teenagers and young adults. And I don't want to hear this is untrue because my bro own's 3 movie theaters.
We know.
Originally posted by zeelFinally some honesty. Fanboys like to pretend dc isn't all about this. I keep trying to educate them.
The original shazam movie had private investors involved , the total was over 300 million. Shazam actually had better financial backing then the superman movie, whatever happened to the backing I have no idea.I agree with you Quanchi its all about superman and batman. In the marvel universe the spotlight is more evenly shared, I think this is the reason marvel gets more of a variety of fans where D.C. caters to the much younger teenagers and young adults. And I don't want to hear this is untrue because my bro own's 3 movie theaters.
We know.
Re: Re: How Superman ruined Shazam movie
Originally posted by zeel
The original shazam movie had private investors involved , the total was over 300 million. Shazam actually had better financial backing then the superman movie, whatever happened to the backing I have no idea.I agree with you Quanchi its all about superman and batman. In the marvel universe the spotlight is more evenly shared, I think this is the reason marvel gets more of a variety of fans where D.C. caters to the much younger teenagers and young adults. And I don't want to hear this is untrue because my bro own's 3 movie theaters.
We know.
More funding doesn't necessarily mean better movie as we saw with Superman Returns. Also what's exactly the matter with DC presenting its title characters first. I honestly doubt Shazam would've done well if it came out so early anyway.
As for Marvel doing better with their lesser known characters, yeah I can say they've done a phenomenal job introducing their B-list superheroes: I think Iron Man is A-list now because of it. However lets not forget that their hand was force considering their top superheroes like X-men and Spider-man were owned by other companies which pushed them to making their lesser known heroes more attractive to the general public.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Finally some honesty. Fanboys like to pretend dc isn't all about this. I keep trying to educate them.
Originally posted by wakkawakkawakkaZeel got it. Dc focuses too much on Superman and Batman and because of it the rest of the universe takes a backseat to this. Read his post since you can't understand simple points.
More funding doesn't necessarily mean better movie as we saw with Superman Returns. Also what's exactly the matter with DC presenting its title characters first. I honestly doubt Shazam would've done well if it came out so early anyway.As for Marvel doing better with their lesser known characters, yeah I can say they've done a phenomenal job introducing their B-list superheroes: I think Iron Man is A-list now because of it. However lets not forget that their hand was force considering their top superheroes like X-men and Spider-man were owned by other companies which pushed them to making their lesser known heroes more attractive to the general public.
I still have no idea what the hell kind of point your trying to make you've been all over the place in this thread.
😂
Originally posted by Firefly218They don't need to be properly established. That is the point but as always scree the rest here are Batman and Superman again.
DC is beginning its first phase of development towards a shared universe with its top two characters, supes and bats. Im sure the other characters will get their turn in the spotlight once supes and bats are properly established.And in case you were wondering Im not a DC fanboy.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I believe in second and third chances. Dc needs to learn from their mistakes and release quality films like marvel has. I am objective and love movies unlike yourself.
Yeah that would make sense if the Dark Knight Trilogy wasn't the best reviewed superhero trilogy of all time (by both fans and critics), not to mention how it absolutely killed it at the box office.
Originally posted by quanchi112
They don't need to be properly established. That is the point but as always scree the rest here are Batman and Superman again.
They don't need to be properly established? Supes and bats are the leaders of the justice league, its only common sense that they are the first to be established. Other characters like WW and MM will definitely get their turn after MoS 2 comes out. Also green arrow and flash now have their own TV shows and could possibly join the cinematic universe with supes, bats and ww.
Originally posted by Firefly218You can just pick up where your left off. Dc wants to reboot again and again.
They don't need to be properly established? Supes and bats are the leaders of the justice league, its only common sense that they are the first to be established. Other characters like WW and MM will definitely get their turn after MoS 2 comes out. Also green arrow and flash now have their own TV shows and could possibly join the cinematic universe with supes, bats and ww.