Originally posted by RobtardI haven't seen the movie so I have no opinion on it. I am criticizing their decisions here though. Horrible decision to reboot Batman. Awful. I loved the Nolan version. I guess you didn't, nerd.
Proof that you already judged this movie to be crap, despite not even seeing a trailer yet.Only you would think taking young kids to a superhero based movie targeted in part at them is somehow bad, you're such a silly little man 🙂
Originally posted by quanchi112
I never said it was good. 😂I loved the Batman films. There goes your theory. Batman is from dc, genius.
You enjoyed it enough to say it "has potential" initially. Then you flipped once you saw no one else really liked it. ie Bandwagon-boi mentality.
You just implied above that "DC" doesn't release quality films and needs to like "Marvel" has. Now you're flipping back to loving Nolan's Batman's nuts. Make up your mind for once, princess 🙂
Originally posted by RobtardIt did have potential for sequels but the movie itself was not good. Not once did I say the movie was good.
You enjoyed it enough to say it "has potential" initially. Then you flipped once you saw no one else really liked it. ie Bandwagon-boi mentality.You just implied above that "DC" doesn't release quality films and needs to like "Marvel" has. Now you're flipping back to loving Nolan's Batman's nuts. Make up your mind for once, princess 🙂
No, I said dc makes stupid decisions especially compared to marvel. They have a solid franchise and reboot it after they just rebooted man of steel which was awful.
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, I said dc makes stupid decisions especially compared to marvel. They have a solid franchise and reboot it after they just rebooted man of steel which was awful.
The DC reboots making loads of $$$ disagree with you:
-Superman Returns was a continuation of Superman & Superman II; it didn't do as expected, though still doubled its money or there about.
-MoS was a reboot; it more than doubled its money.
-The Nolan Batman trilogy was a reboot and not a continuation of the Keaton, Kilmer and/or Clooney films; they did great.
So you see "reboots" can and do work. Stop crying about it alread 🙂
Originally posted by RobtardIt is a success but not as much as previously projected. I still hated the film.
The DC reboots making loads of $$$ disagree with you:-Superman Returns was a continuation of Superman & Superman II; it didn't do as expected, though still doubled its money or there about.
-MoS was a reboot; it more than doubled its money.
-The Nolan Batman trilogy was a reboot and not a continuation of the Keaton, Kilmer and/or Clooney films; they did great.
So you see "reboots" can and do work. Stop crying about it alread 🙂
These movies aren't on Avengers level. 😄
I never said reboots can't work. I said rebooting a proven young franchise is stupid. Marvel is expanding whereas dc is starting from scratch and then copying the marvel gravy train.
You're consistently claiming "DC" makes poor decisions, when they've made decisions that make them money and give us good films. So you're clearly wrong and just too cowardly to admit it.
😂 @ you now moving the goal post and comparing MoS and Nolan Batman to The Avengers, which had the buildup of 5 films and multiple characters behind it. Wait until the JL flick comes out to compare, you silly little man.
Originally posted by RobtardThey have made poor decisions but not every decision is terrible.
You're consistently claiming "DC" makes poor decisions, when they've made decisions that make them money and give us good films. So you're clearly wrong and just too cowardly to admit it.😂 @ you now moving the goal post and comparing MoS and Nolan Batman to The Avengers, which had the buildup of 5 films and multiple characters behind it. Wait until the JL flick comes out to compare, you silly little man.
I am comparing what I've seen to movies of the past. You can continue to say what and see since you're a dc fanboy.
Originally posted by quanchi112
They have made poor decisions but not every decision is terrible.I am comparing what I've seen to movies of the past. You can continue to say what and see since you're a dc fanboy.
They're in the business of making money; they have and they're setting themselves up to expand and make more. You crying won't change that.
No, you jut tried to use the "Avenger's made more money" ringer again and compared it to MoS and the Nolan films. The clownishness of that was pointed out and you know it, why you tucked your tail, tried to ignore the point and took childish little jabs instead 🙂 You've been beaten again.
Originally posted by RobtardQuality of the films has gone downhill.
They're in the business of making money; they have and they're setting themselves up to expand and make more. You crying won't change that.No, you jut tried to use the "Avenger's made more money" ringer again and compared it to MoS and the Nolan films. The clownishness of that was pointed out and you know it, why you tucked your tail, tried to ignore the point and took childish little jabs instead 🙂 You've been beaten again.
Avengers was a solid film and the best. It also made the most money. Win/win.
They discontinued the Nolan Batman who was awesome. Shame on you dc.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Quality of the films has gone downhill.Avengers was a solid film and the best. It also made the most money. Win/win.
They discontinued the Nolan Batman who was awesome. Shame on you dc.
😂 Using your logic that if any following movie isn't better than a previous (as you claimed with MoS coming after Nolan's Batman), than Marvel is the worst offender here:
-IM 2 and 3 were not better than IM.
-Thor 2 was not better than Thor, IM, Captain America or The Avengers.
Good job once again killing your argument and shitting on Marvel 🙂 Just stop, you're outclassed.
Originally posted by RobtardI disagree with most of your opinions here.
😂 Using your logic that if any following movie isn't better than a previous (as you claimed with MoS coming after Nolan's Batman), than Marvel is the worst offender here:-IM 2 and 3 were not better than IM.
-Thor 2 was not better than Thor, IM, Captain America or The Avengers.
Good job once again killing your argument and shitting on Marvel 🙂 Just stop, you're outclassed.
There is no reason to reboot Batman since they had a great one to begin with.
Mos was a garbage film. The new dc shared universe is off to a bad start while I doubt the new Batman will be on par with Nolan's.
Originally posted by RobtardMovie made a ton of money and quality is subjective. Thor 2 was decent enough which also came after. Man of Steel was awful.
You thought IM3 was crappy for sure; that came out [u]after[u\] Avengers. 🙂Your logic dictates that Marvel has been making poor decisions and the quality of their films has gone down 🙂
Originally posted by quanchi112
Movie made a ton of money and quality is subjective. Thor 2 was decent enough which also came after.Man of Steel was awful.
😂 And the expected flips when cornered with your own little set of rules.
Well then, wouldn't that be "subjective" and therefore not a valid point as the IM3 point above 🙂
Just stop already.
Originally posted by RobtardThor 2 also came after. I never said every marvel movie is gold. I am objective and don't just side with companies. That is the point but marvel is clearly making the smarter moves of the two.
😂 And the expected flips when cornered with your own little set of rules.Well then, wouldn't that be "subjective" and therefore not a valid point as the IM3 point above 🙂
Just stop already.