Balrog (Durin's Bane) vs Hogwarts

Started by KuRuPT Thanosi14 pages

Originally posted by quanchi112
Ifyou kill your opponent and die years later you won. Who dies first matters. Gandalf won. He also came back.

False. Destroying the Hogwarts shield is far more impressive than killing pine cone tossing Gandalf.

If it was years later.. sure that would make a difference. This wasn't and it was almost immediately after.. Therefore, that doesn't matter. No need to try and use a fallacy against me because your losing the argument. The balrog killed Gandalf... PERIOD. That is more impressive than destroying some shield that isn't fighting back shoes.

The Balrog > some stationary shield

#droppingfactslikeamofo

Originally posted by Robtard
The Balrog > some stationary shield

#droppingfactslikeamofo

In terms of protection Voldemort Couldnt hurt him. It had to do with the mothers sacrifice not the baby, dummy.

#exposingmidgetsleftandright

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
If it was years later.. sure that would make a difference. This wasn't and it was almost immediately after.. Therefore, that doesn't matter. No need to try and use a fallacy against me because your losing the argument. The balrog killed Gandalf... PERIOD. That is more impressive than destroying some shield that isn't fighting back shoes.
Fale. If your opponent dies first with you still around you won. Gandalf won. Period. Balrog stayed dead. Gandalf did not.

Originally posted by quanchi112
In terms of protection Voldemort Couldnt hurt him. It had to do with the mothers sacrifice not the baby, dummy.

#exposingmidgetsleftandright

Non sequitur response. Talking about the Hogwart's shield, you angry mindless ranter

You emulate whatever I do still, glad nothing has change since your month of hiding in fear from me, very flattering 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
Non sequitur response. Talking about the Hogwart's shield, you angry mindless ranter

You emulate whatever I do still, glad nothing has change since your month of hiding in fear from me

Which withstood hundreds if not thousands of blasts and disintegrated bodies. GTFO.

Oh please. You're the complete opposite of me. Weak, short, cowardly, pathetic post count, awful taste in preferences.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Which withstood hundreds if not thousands of blasts and disintegrated bodies. GTFO.

Oh please. You're the complete opposite of me. Weak, short, cowardly, pathetic post count, awful taste in preferences.

All the dark wizards had to do was not be retards and not fly into it. The Balrog comes after you

Deflecting again

Originally posted by Robtard
All the dark wizards had to do was not be retards and not fly into it. The Balrog comes after you

Deflecting again

Destroying the shield was more impressive than Gandalf killing the Balrog. Greater showing of power.

You admitted your tiny height.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Destroying the shield was more impressive than Gandalf killing the Balrog. Greater showing of power.

You admitted your tiny height.

Once again I have to reach down, take your hand and walk you through this:

1) Voldermort (aka He Who Lost To A Baby) is not in this match, it is The Balrog (aka Durin's Bane) Vs Hogwarts wizards as seen in the last film

2) In a fight, a stationary shield which can be avoided is not a greater treat than a giant demonic being who comes after you

You're welcome, Five-Foot-Four-In-Shoes-Guy

Originally posted by quanchi112
Fale. If your opponent dies first with you still around you won. Gandalf won. Period. Balrog stayed dead. Gandalf did not.

Gandalf also died.. and RIGHT after. You have literally no clue what happened... Gandalf went back because the Valar sent him back to complete his mission. His spirit like the balrog (also a maia) doesn't die.. it goes to Valinor and is unable to take physical form unless they or eru approves. So yeah the balrog did kill Gandalf. That is exponentially more impressive than destroying a shield that doesn't fight back.

Quan is a small fellow... Whenever I see him post I think of the line in Full Metal Jacket... I didn't know they stacked shit that high.

This thread is fail on many levels.

Originally posted by Robtard
Once again I have to reach down, take your hand and walk you through this:

1) Voldermort (aka He Who Lost To A Baby) is not in this match, it is The Balrog (aka Durin's Bane) Vs Hogwarts wizards as seen in the last film

2) In a fight, a stationary shield which can be avoided is not a greater treat than a giant demonic being who comes after you

You're welcome, Five-Foot-Four-In-Shoes-Guy

1) context. Magic protected Harry. The baby has nothing to do with it, runt.

2) a giant being who can easily be avoided do, is slow, cannot fly, etc. Be serious. In potter the Wizards don't have to hide up trees.

Slaughter the featless Balrog.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Gandalf also died.. and RIGHT after. You have literally no clue what happened... Gandalf went back because the Valar sent him back to complete his mission. His spirit like the balrog (also a maia) doesn't die.. it goes to Valinor and is unable to take physical form unless they or eru approves. So yeah the balrog did kill Gandalf. That is exponentially more impressive than destroying a shield that doesn't fight back.
Yes, right after which means Gandalf won. It died. In the film. Fact. No where in any film do they used the word Maia. Quit bringing the rules, ugly abe.

False. Shield has more impressive feats than weak Balrog

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Quan is a small fellow... Whenever I see him post I think of the line in Full Metal Jacket... I didn't know they stacked shit that high.
Coming from a lanky, long faced, doofus looking nerd. That's rich.

😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
1) context. Magic protected Harry. The baby has nothing to do with it, runt.

2) a giant being who can easily be avoided do, is slow, cannot fly, etc. Be serious. In potter the Wizards don't have to hide up trees.

Slaughter the featless Balrog.

You still haven't figured out that Voldermort isn't in this thread, loser who tried to kill and baby and lost

"be avoided do"? Speak English. Thanks

Balrog already won this thread, you won't be able to handle this and will continue to rant. It is known

Originally posted by Robtard
You still haven't figured out that Voldermort isn't in this thread, loser who tried to kill and baby and lost

"be avoided do"? Speak English. Thanks

Balrog already won this thread, you won't be able to handle this and will continue to rant. It is known

😂

Originally posted by Robtard
You still haven't figured out that Voldermort isn't in this thread, loser who tried to kill and baby and lost

"be avoided do"? Speak English. Thanks

Balrog already won this thread, you won't be able to handle this and will continue to rant. It is known

You are bringing him up. I will respond, napoleon.

Context. Balrog failed to kill anyone on screen. You cling to typos thus proving you can't actually argue, hobbit.

Balrog lost. He is too slow and can be worn down. Wizards fly, apparate, and can use long ranged combat. This isn't pine cone throwing Gandalf.

Go hide up a tree like your gay pal, Gandalf.

Like a good little puppet, so easy to pull your strings

Context: The Balrog annihilated Moria, an entire Kingdom. That means you're wrong again and lost again

Called it! You wouldn't be able to handle the Balrog's victory and are doing flips as expected

Originally posted by Robtard
Like a good little puppet, so easy to pull your strings

Context: The Balrog annihilated Moria, an entire Kingdom. That means you're wrong again and lost again

Called it! You wouldn't be able to handle the Balrog's victory and are doing flips as expected

You are playing my game, slave.

We did not see any of that on screen. I said failed to kill anyone in victory on screen. That was off screen.

Balrog can't touch the wizards as he is slow and can be worn down by opponents who don't need to fight with a sword up close and personal. You're not smart.