Originally posted by Silent Masteryou wanna troll then ok.
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/...mp;pagenumber=6 .
Like I said nothing Bran never proved nor attempted to prove that caps shield is many times greater than Superman's power to damage. You are linking to stuff that has nothing to do with that statement.
Originally posted by Silent Masterhe did not prove it at all. Did you even read his posts?
Bran proved that the shield is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those missiles.
Originally posted by h1a8
not me but bran. Remember I said according to his argument (not mine) he proven the eyeblasts were weak cause it didn't disintegrate cap's skeleton.
This is his logic. It all leads to a contradiction.
So you admit that the beams weren't weak and were infact powerful enough to damage Cap's shield?
Originally posted by Silent Masterstop trolling.
So you admit that the beams weren't weak and were infact powerful enough to damage Cap's shield?
Originally posted by h1a8
stop trolling.
That has nothing to do with the discussion.
My point is that if we accept Bran's argument then we have to accept the later which leads to a contradiction. What I believe is irrelevant since you are championing Bran's argument.
So you're arguing that Cap's shield is less durable than a human skeleton?
Time to add to the things that have tanked the OBs, as well, or better than Doomsday did
http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd247/kjs1982/Astro-Harness/AstroForceBlocksOmegaBeams1.jpg
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/scale_super/6/67877/1913132-jla185_24.jpg
http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/228/takingomegabeams6thoy8.jpg
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/7701/takingomegabeams29nanh6.jpg
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/1788/takingomegabeams37fizd5.jpg
http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/4177/takingomegabeams44rgcj7.jpg
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/5721/takingomegabeams51xlqs4.jpg
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/3/33308/1529972-pis.jpg
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/0/2532/990736-supermanbatman01328jq.jpg
---
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o106/bigbran1/Superman/countdown3p08.jpg
Superman only gets knocked out when he can't even walk due to Kryptonite Jimmy. Severely weakened Superman is apparently way more durable than Cap's shield
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o106/bigbran1/Superman/countdown3p15.jpg
A gun tanks the OB. Which is more durable than Cap's shield (if Cap's bones is a serious argument...)
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o106/bigbran1/comic/SupermanBatman042-21.jpg
And most importantly of all, Henshaw tanks twice the power of the OBs (which at half prove he can destroy the shield):
http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh187/DarkseidRes/HaCsAHunter-Prey-02-40.jpg
http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh187/DarkseidRes/HaCsAHunter-Prey-02-41.jpg
http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh187/DarkseidRes/HaCsAHunter-Prey-02-42.jpg
10 different scenes don't mean anything. 11 if you add in Doomsday doing just as well as these.
Although in Countdown Darkseid was operating at a way higher level than he was in Hunter Prey, so I'm sure those would carry more weight.
Darkseid has never destroyed anything as close to as durable as Cap's shield. Scaling up doesn't indicate anything when Hank Henshaw survived an attack twice as powerful.
Also, lol at lowballing destroying Cap's shield because his bones survived... when will the ban come?
Originally posted by h1a8
Thus Superman can't damage Cyborg using all of his might. This is a contradiction and thus a logical impossibility. Thus the assumption is wrong and the beams that hit Henshaw wasn't as powerful as the ones that his the missiles.[b]So you thus showed that Henshaw is durable enough to withstand punches from Superman (although Superman punched chips from him) without being much damaged and is possibly as durable against blunt force as those missiles. But what about HV? Superman damaged him with HV though and thus my point still holds
THUS-POCALYPSE!!!
Originally posted by Branlor SwiftI'm discussing the power level of the OB in that particular arc and not what it will be in a forum fight. So other comics are irrelevant. If Glads busts a planet in one comic then in that particular comic he has planet destroying strength. That doesn't mean he has planet destroying strength in a forum fight.
Time to add to the things that have tanked the OBs, as well, or better than Doomsday didhttp://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd247/kjs1982/Astro-Harness/AstroForceBlocksOmegaBeams1.jpg
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/scale_super/6/67877/1913132-jla185_24.jpg
http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/228/takingomegabeams6thoy8.jpg
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/7701/takingomegabeams29nanh6.jpg
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/1788/takingomegabeams37fizd5.jpg
http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/4177/takingomegabeams44rgcj7.jpg
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/5721/takingomegabeams51xlqs4.jpghttp://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/3/33308/1529972-pis.jpg
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/0/2532/990736-supermanbatman01328jq.jpg
---
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o106/bigbran1/Superman/countdown3p08.jpg
Superman only gets knocked out when he can't even walk due to Kryptonite Jimmy. Severely weakened Superman is apparently way more durable than Cap's shield
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o106/bigbran1/Superman/countdown3p15.jpgA gun tanks the OB. Which is more durable than Cap's shield (if Cap's bones is a serious argument...)
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o106/bigbran1/comic/SupermanBatman042-21.jpgAnd most importantly of all, Henshaw tanks twice the power of the OBs (which at half prove he can destroy the shield):
http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh187/DarkseidRes/HaCsAHunter-Prey-02-40.jpg
http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh187/DarkseidRes/HaCsAHunter-Prey-02-41.jpg
http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh187/DarkseidRes/HaCsAHunter-Prey-02-42.jpg10 different scenes don't mean anything. 11 if you add in Doomsday doing just as well as these.
Although in Countdown Darkseid was operating at a way higher level than he was in Hunter Prey, so I'm sure those would carry more weight.Darkseid has never destroyed anything as close to as durable as Cap's shield. Scaling up doesn't indicate anything when Hank Henshaw survived an attack twice as powerful.
Also, lol at lowballing destroying Cap's shield because his bones survived... when will the ban come?
Also, the OB was weaker on henshaw than it was on the missiles as I proven.
You lowballed caps shield by arguing that. You should be banned. It was your argument not mine.
Look at your henshaw argument. You are saying the same thing to caps skeleton. You want to pick and choose now?
Originally posted by Silent Masteryou did and also Bran said it. You said bran proved that shield >>>>>>>missiles.
Now you're just lying as neither one of us has said that.
I don't accept it, you and bran do.
Originally posted by h1a8
you did and also Bran said it. You said bran proved that shield >>>>>>>missiles.
But his argument to prove it also implies caps skeleton is more durable than the shield. So accepting his argument means you accept that caps skeleton is more durable than the shield.I don't accept it, you and bran do.
Post the quotes where bran and I said that the shield was less durable that a human skeleton.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Post the quotes where bran and I said that the shield was less durable that a human skeleton.
Originally posted by h1a8you accepted his argument thus you are saying the skeleton>shield.
Bran is saying the missiles are shit because henshaw wasn't damaged (although I proved that he experienced a weaker attack).That's the same thing as saying the shield is shit because the skeleton wasn't damaged like the shield.
