Originally posted by Silent Masteryou are completely ignoring my argument. You are basically straw manning .
Except, KT's blasts can destroy Cap's shield and all the blasts that DD tanked did was destroy some missiles that even you admit are less durable than sed shield.
The shield being more durable than the missiles doesn't mean KT eyeblast is greater the the OB.
The OB vaporizing vs. merely damaging the missiles proves that it can damage something many times more durable than the missiles. The shield isn't many times more durable than Superman's power per feats. And thus it isn't many times more durable than the missiles.
Originally posted by carver9
You know you'll never change his mind...no matter what evidence you give him. Don't understand why this debate is going on so long. It next to difficult to convince H1 of anything.
Thing is, H1 fancies himself a great debater when he stretches these threads out.
When in fact, it goes on for this long because he has a combination of ignorance, faulty logic and pig-headed stubbornness. I've seen it happen three times now, and....
It happened with the Classic Kingpin vs Ozymandias thread, where I trounced him with scans that anyone spending 5 mins trawling the Kingpin respect thread would've discovered.
It happened the the Dr. Manhattan threads, where we had to get a mod ruling AND a telling off that he needed a day or so to calm his hissy fit down.
It also happened in the Ozymandias vs Captain American thread, where I promptly forget the circumstances.
In any case, in this thread, Thor wins handily through BFR, and there is nothing, NOTHING, that the straw man argument of Doomsday's durability can resolve.
And before someone says, 'Oh, Thor is a warrior and wouldn't BFR', he did so against a physical opponent he couldn't physically beat - Worthy Hulk.
Then of course, there is time stop, and King Thor can see the future etc.
It's almost like a Dr. Manhattan thread, except with Thor's mindset.
Originally posted by Silent MasterAt minimum the missiles > superman. Thus the shield has to be many times more durable than the missiles in order for your inequality to be true.
According to you, Superman using all his might was unable to even scratch the missiles and since the shield is more durable than the missiles, that means you're admitting that the shield is infact >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Superman.
The feat the missiles have is withstanding all of superman's might without any damage. Per feats, the shield isn't more than 2 times more durable than the missiles, as it has no feats above resisting power above twice that of Superman.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85using bfr KT can win.
Thing is, H1 fancies himself a great debater when he stretches these threads out.When in fact, it goes on for this long because he has a combination of ignorance, faulty logic and pig-headed stubbornness. I've seen it happen three times now, and....
It happened with the Classic Kingpin vs Ozymandias thread, where I trounced him with scans that anyone spending 5 mins trawling the Kingpin respect thread would've discovered.
It happened the the Dr. Manhattan threads, where we had to get a mod ruling AND a telling off that he needed a day or so to calm his hissy fit down.
It also happened in the Ozymandias vs Captain American thread, where I promptly forget the circumstances.
In any case, in this thread, Thor wins handily through BFR, and there is nothing, NOTHING, that the straw man argument of Doomsday's durability can resolve.
And before someone says, 'Oh, Thor is a warrior and wouldn't BFR', he did so against a physical opponent he couldn't physically beat - Worthy Hulk.
Then of course, there is time stop, and King Thor can see the future etc.
It's almost like a Dr. Manhattan thread, except with Thor's mindset.