Originally posted by quanchi112
You just said she used weakness exploitation. Now you retort by asking me to post a scan.😂
What is even funnier is that it has been stated and depicted on panel that Superman has dynamic strength.
Watching you dance in circles though is better than citing that fact.
P.S. Show Diana!
Originally posted by LordofBrooklynAre you pretending to be retarded again?
More ad hominems as your inablity to refute my argument continues.Please, go on.
Also, you blatantly ignored previous arguments against you because you were "joking" (even though your jokes had nothing to do with Thor showing dynamic strength which you called ridiculous), and pretending to be retarded in what you called "Branlorism". Now you've rehashed them after insulting your own arguments.
It's quite funny actually. Desperation ensues. Continuing using an argument you applied to acting like me though.
But if you want to stop looking stupid against me, I'm sure looking dumb against Quan is favorable apparently.
Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
I'm just curious.I'm not offended by anything that has been posted in this thread.
Did someone actually make a complaint?
Yes, actually, about one person in this thread. When I came in here though, I saw that it was more than one.
====
Either way, I honestly don't mind constructive discussion on the topic. Sin asked a reasonable question from her pov, but instead of people actually being on topic, they're sniping away, and that caused a backlash, and it stops here.
This thread isn't about whether Superman has dynamic strength or not. The question is, assuming he has, how great is it.
If you don't think he has, then say so and move on. Don't act like a petulant child throwing his rattle out of the pram because people don't agree with you.
So, people either get on topic, or I close it.
I don't even have to keep this open, as both Bada and I are perfectly happy keeping our own counsel.
Originally posted by leonidas
i think this sums things up best. is there some evidence that indicates he gains strength based on stress levels or perceived threats? yes, there is some. it's printed right on panel in black and white. blatantly ignoring it seems nonsensical to me. now, you can attribute it to bad writing, call it pis, whatever. imo i do think his strength works differently from others, or that it does in the eyes of some writers. and if SOME writers think that way, it IS different because NO writers feel that same way about the majority of others. however, we need to see A LOT more before we start mentioning it in the same breath we mention hulk's strength. it needs to be black and white, and be more evidently ingrained into his powerset. there are rare times when that seems to be the case. due to the relative rarity though, we pretty much have to fall back on the side of 'cutting loose' most of the time. imo.
U and galan make excellent points however imo sm consistently has displayed an ability to tier jump under stress that cannot be denied.
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Are you pretending to be retarded again?Also, you blatantly ignored previous arguments against you because you were "joking" (even though your jokes had nothing to do with Thor showing dynamic strength which you called ridiculous), and pretending to be retarded in what you called "Branlorism". Now you've rehashed them after insulting your own arguments.
It's quite funny actually. Desperation ensues. Continuing using an argument you applied to acting like me though.But if you want to stop looking stupid against me, I'm sure looking dumb against Quan is favorable apparently.
AGAIN, the instances you cited for Thor don't match what has been displayed for Superman.
Period.
I gave the exception to Warrior Madness as that Thor has a definitive leap in power.
Period.
You can keep posturing but the posts speak for themselves.
Originally posted by -Pr-Oops, my pants just fell down.
You get a pass, obviously. You sexy beast, you.
Originally posted by LordofBrooklynIt's the same thing in Thor's case. Not bothering to even attempt to refute it doesn't mean it doesn't count. Though I agree the posts speak for themselves.
AGAIN, the instances you cited for Thor don't match what has been displayed for Superman.Period.
I gave the exception to Warrior Madness as that Thor has a definitive leap in power.
Period.
You can keep posturing but the posts speak for themselves.
But anyway, on topic.
Hulk would win a test of strength. The guy can instantly amp to PakHulk afterwards. But Superman would win in higher tier feats. It's the same thing with most of the beings on this level. Hulk lacks the "abstract" feats, but he is stronger than the beings who have them.
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
It's the same thing in Thor's case. Not bothering to even attempt to refute it doesn't mean it doesn't count. Though I agree the posts speak for themselves.
While it was stated in BLOOD AND THUNDER that it wasn't true warrior madness, the way Thor easily defeated characters in his tier, and dealt with Thanos who is clearly above it shows he went up several tiers.
The characters involved and the setting allow for a clear appraisal of the increase in power.
The other instances still fall in the realm of average Thor doing the aforementioned "Comeback" that takes place in heroic fiction.
Originally posted by LordofBrooklynSo... what you're saying is Blood and Thunder doesn't count because it showed Thor having dynamic strength, and Thor tearing through beings he had immense problems with is just a comeback?
While it was stated in BLOOD AND THUNDER that it wasn't true warrior madness, the way Thor easily defeated characters in his tier, and dealt with Thanos who is clearly above it shows he went up several tiers.The characters involved and the setting allow for a clear appraisal of the increase in power.
The other instances still fall in the realm of average Thor doing the aforementioned "Comeback" that takes place in heroic fiction.
😂