Originally posted by chasedown
A number cant just be created out of thin air especially if we know nothing of how the jutsu works or is performed..... Therefore the feat cant be used...... Only concrete evidence standsThats like going to court and convicting someone of a crime because of word of mouth it cant happen. In order to convict you need unargueable evidence to convict..... The same premise hold true in a debate facts must be shown not speculation.
Exactly, which is why I just used only concrete evidence. You discounting it only shows your ignorance.
So why did OJ Simpson nearly get sent to prison? Hell, watch the move "Shawshank redemption", and you'll know how stupid you just made yourself look.
Originally posted by SSJGGogeta
Exactly, which is why I just used only concrete evidence. You discounting it only shows your ignorance.So why did OJ Simpson nearly get sent to prison? Hell, watch the move "Shawshank redemption", and you'll know how stupid you just made yourself look.
"That many" isnt concrete evidence at all and doesnt give an exact number.
What does shawshank redemption have to do with anything. Even in that movie the court had evidence which is why he was convicted. They didnt convict him on purely word of mouth.
The prosecutor got the defendant to say things that led the jury to believe he was guilty. He even said he had a gun on him the night of his wifes murder and was heading to where she was but thought it over. Unfortunately they had andy dufrain's fingerprints and tire tracks at the scene of the crime. All of these facts plus his remorseless demeanor in court led to him being convicted.Ever heard the saying "anything you say can be used against you in the court of law"
Again this movie has nothing to do with anything and doesnt prove me wrong
Originally posted by chasedown
"That many" isnt concrete evidence at all and doesnt give an exact number.What does shawshank redemption have to do with anything. Even in that movie the court had evidence which is why he was convicted. They didnt convict him on purely word of mouth.
The prosecutor got the defendant to say things that led the jury to believe he was guilty. He even said he had a gun on him the night of his wifes murder and was heading to where she was but thought it over. Unfortunately they had andy dufrain's fingerprints and tire tracks at the scene of the crime. All of these facts plus his remorseless demeanor in court led to him being convicted.Ever heard the saying "anything you say can be used against you in the court of law"
Again this movie has nothing to do with anything and doesnt prove me wrong
It is actually, because you can't cast genjutsu on 1.1 people, retard.
They convicted him on speculation, which was proven wrong.
Uh, duh, retard. They didn't have fingerprints on anything other than his steering wheel. That's exactly what you're doing, claiming something without thinking about the other side of the story. The way in which seriousness Shikaku said it proves its validity alone. Itachi can use genjutsu on at least two people at once, and presumably more. However, it also takes two people to break one out of genjutsu from the proof I've given. Disprove it with something other than denial, or be quiet.
Originally posted by SSJGGogeta
It is actually, because you can't cast genjutsu on 1.1 people, retard.They convicted him on speculation, which was proven wrong.
Uh, duh, retard. They didn't have fingerprints on anything other than his steering wheel. That's exactly what you're doing, claiming something without thinking about the other side of the story. The way in which seriousness Shikaku said it proves its validity alone. Itachi can use genjutsu on at least two people at once, and presumably more. However, it also takes two people to break one out of genjutsu from the proof I've given. Disprove it with something other than denial, or be quiet.
Thats the dumbest thing i ever heard someone say "that many" equals 1.1 people lol wtf. You mean to tell me if you take a math test "that many" is a credible answer. I feel sorry for you in school if thats what you put because your grades must suck.
Actually they had his fingerprints on the bullets at the scene of the crime and a bottle of liquor he had left on the scene. Also had he been able to go to court and present the evidence that proved him innocent he would have been set free. Andy dufrain was convicted because of incriminating evidence that didnt help his case and his demeanor in court.
Not word of mouth which is my main point.
Your trying to use word of mouf. That could mean anything to make it mean what you want it to because it would be convienient for itachi in this fight. You cant do that because we literally know nothing about the jutsu itachi may or may not have. We dont know how strong,how long it takes to perform, how its performed, or how many people he can put under it. "That many" answers none of those questions.
Like i said shawshank has nothing to do with this. They had more evidence in that movie than someone saying "that many"
Originally posted by chasedown
Thats the dumbest thing i ever heard someone say "that many" equals 1.1 people lol wtf. You mean to tell me if you take a math test "that many" is a credible answer. I feel sorry for you in school if thats what you put because your grades must suck.Actually they had his fingerprints on the bullets at the scene of the crime and a bottle of liquor he had left on the scene. Also had he been able to go to court and present the evidence that proved him innocent he would have been set free. Andy dufrain was convicted because of incriminating evidence that didnt help his case and his demeanor in court.
Not word of mouth which is my main point.Your trying to use word of mouf. That could mean anything to make it mean what you want it to because it would be convienient for itachi in this fight. You cant do that because we literally know nothing about the jutsu itachi may or may not have. We dont know how strong,how long it takes to perform, how its performed, or how many people he can put under it. "That many" answers none of those questions.
Like i said shawshank has nothing to do with this. They had more evidence in that movie than someone saying "that many"
lol, stupid people often resort to bashing when they know they're wrong. Btw, I suggest you go to a hospital to get a diagnosis, because I seriously suspect that you have some kind of seriously debilitating mental condition.
Learn to read. He said that Itachi could control multiple people in multiple locations at once. That means at least two people, because he can't control half of someone, genius.
Again, learn to read or just shut up.
Originally posted by SSJGGogeta
lol, stupid people often resort to bashing when they know they're wrong. Btw, I suggest you go to a hospital to get a diagnosis, because I seriously suspect that you have some kind of seriously debilitating mental condition.Learn to read. He said that Itachi could control multiple people in multiple locations at once. That means at least two people, because he can't control half of someone, genius.
Again, learn to read or just shut up.
Like "this many" makes a big difference cmon now.
Changing "that" to "this" still doesnt answer any of the questions that were in my previous post.
"This many" is still none conclusive and doesnt give a definite answer. You cant go to court with it, nor have you seen any political debate use "this many" as an answer to any question presented to them,nor can you put it as an answer to any math question on a test unless your objective is to fail.It doesnt answer anything but instead leads to more questions.
Originally posted by chasedown
How are you gonna say that and insult me in the same post? Kinda contradicting yourself buddy.Like "this many" makes a big difference cmon now.
Changing "that" to "this" still doesnt answer any of the questions that were in my previous post.
"This many" is still none conclusive and doesnt give a definite answer. You cant go to court with it, nor have you seen any political debate use "this many" as an answer to any question presented to them,nor can you put it as an answer to any math question on a test unless your objective is to fail.It doesnt answer anything but instead leads to more questions.
Just retorting, like anyone would, "buddy".
I already explained it. It's not my fault if you're too stupid to understand what 1+1 equals.
Originally posted by SSJGGogeta
So you acknowledge that Itachi can control two people at once?Therefore, you might as well concede.
1+1=2....Conclusive
But "this many" doesnt equal 2
"This many" can be anywhere from 0 and up. What we do know conclusively and legitimately is that he can control at least 1 person because weve seen him do so and know how he did it. Anything above that is all speculation and could be wrong. My main point is you cant use "this many" as evidence is inconclusive and doesnt give any facts but instead raises more questions.
http://i.word.com/idictionary/inconclusive
All im saying is you have to find a more definite way that itachi would win not by giving him a unnamed jutsu he may or may not be able to do.
Originally posted by chasedown
1+1=2....ConclusiveBut "this many" doesnt equal 2
"This many" can be anywhere from 0 and up. What we do know conclusively and legitimately is that he can control at least 1 person because weve seen him do so and know how he did it. Anything above that is all speculation and could be wrong. My main point is you cant use "this many" as evidence is inconclusive and doesnt give any facts but instead raises more questions.
http://i.word.com/idictionary/inconclusive
All im saying is you have to find a more definite way that itachi would win not by giving him a unnamed jutsu he may or may not be able to do.
So not only do you lack the knowledge of how to perform simple math, but also how to read?
"This many", is plural, genius. Plural means multiple. In other words, he can control MULTIPLE people. This means, that since you can't control half or any fraction of a person, THAT THE LOWEST ITACHI CAN CAST GENJUTSU ON AT ONCE IS TWO PEOPLE.
Goddamn, I feel like I'm the only one with a brain on this phucking website.
Originally posted by SSJGGogeta
So not only do you lack the knowledge of how to perform simple math, but also how to read?"This many", is plural, genius. Plural means multiple. In other words, he can control MULTIPLE people. This means, that since you can't control half or any fraction of a person, THAT THE LOWEST ITACHI CAN CAST GENJUTSU ON AT ONCE IS TWO PEOPLE.
Goddamn, I feel like I'm the only one with a brain on this phucking website.
At least two is still not definite nor conclusive saying at least still gives leeway
1+1 isnt "at least" 2