Originally posted by Demonic Phoenix
I'm looking at it from a military perspective where a strategy is a long term plan that typically encompasses the entire scenario, while a tactic is a short term action that is more focused towards helping bring about the strategy's success.
And your definitions are different, despite seeming similar. 'Specific end' and 'major/overall aim' can be two different things.
But yes, I am arguing semantics, since I think you douchenozzles really mean tactics instead of strategy. uhuhIt's something he actually planned out beforehand, unlike the Kabuto battle. His tactics in the Uchiha hideout fight were all geared towards pushing Sasuke to the brink. Whereas in the Kabuto fight, it was what? At worst you could say it was landing Izanami. Hardly comparable, especially since he had little to no idea what Kabuto was capable of.
This doesn't matter though. I can't recall Minato or Itachi coming up with complex plans that span a 'long' battle or battles, like Shikamaru has, in the midst of a fight to boot. The most complex strat I can think of from either of the two is the Uchiha hideout fight, and that's not saying much.
They primarily use deductions, counters based on said deductions, and hax in their fights. Ergo, tacticians.
Where Minato had the guys toss a bunch of kunai and he used FTG? I guess that could be seen as strategy; while it is a bawss one, it's hardly complex.
Compare that with an Itachi clone who had our favourite elderly kunoichi shitting her pants after he'd revealed some of his abilities to Kakashi and Naruto a few years earlier. Have to be 10x more manly than Minato to pull that strat off. 313
Sorry for the tl;dr.
Yes yes but strictly speaking military strategy is more like this or this. Where the individual approaches an entire situation and forms a sequence of events based on evidence.
Yeah but that's a strategy in the same way the rope-a-dope style of fighting is a strategy. Itachi really had no idea what Sasuke could actually do, or at least we're given little evidence that he did, so his plan basically boiled down to no-selling everything while appearing like he wasn't. And as you've said it is tenuous at best.
I agree that strictly speaking in battle one does not approach a situation with a strategy unless you're Shikamaru since he always seems to find the time. Battles simply move too fast for that. Sasuke can probably still do it since his overall goal in the Deidara fight was "disable this guy" and in battle formulated a plan to do so with careful observation but that is it. Then there is really early stuff where Naruto really did just flat out beat Zabuza through a series of motions that must be called a strategy.
But we both can agree, I hope, that PG really does want us to examine both men as tacticians.
Well beyond that he gave Kakashi a kunai which essentially allowed Minato to act as quick support to the infiltration team while also assisting the front lines. Had Minato not taken into account the danger his team would face and given Kakashi the kunai, Rin and Kakashi would have died with Obito. Actually I do wonder how Obito's arc would have gone in such a situation but that is neither here nor there.
Chiyo didn't shit herself because of Itachi but rather because she is old and she can poop whenever she wants. She considered Itachi so beneath her she didn't even bother bringing out a puppet.
Now for a good comparison between Minato and Itachi one need only look at how they handled Obito. awesome