Originally posted by NemeBro
The lower mantle is so deep that it couldn't have made a mark that size. Try harder.
Also, the heart shape clearly looks like a carving instead of a paint job, as the indentations along the crevices so clearly indicate:
Originally posted by NemeBro
I see my last joke was a bit too high-brow for you.I'll try harder next time.
Originally posted by Epicurus
Yeah, which is exactly why Lois survived as well, didn't she?Unquantifiable feat is unquantifiable.
Based on what is the moon feat speculation?
Lol, so you have proof from the movies which directly tells us that it was painted reddish-pink instead of being blown apart?
But you are biased in favor of Superman. You've made it all too clear on more than one occasion that being an insane Superfan is part of your schtick on these forums.
😂
Everything. It was painted red as shown, everything is pure speculation.
Do you have any proof that it was blown up?
It matters little. You have said that you hate Superman, so I guess your opinion is invalid too?
Originally posted by abhilegend
Lois survived the world engine's gravity beam? You are now spouting random nonsense. Typical for you though.😂
Everything. It was painted red as shown, everything is pure speculation.
Do you have any proof that it was blown up?
It matters little. You have said that you hate Superman, so I guess your opinion is invalid too?
You keep going on and on about it being red paint, but where is your onscreen proof of it being referred as such, huh?
I already posted the pic where the symbol has clear indentations on its sidelines thereby indicating that it was carved instead of painted. Try to keep up.
When did I say that I hate Superman?
Originally posted by Epicurus
She survived the singularity pull, which per Superfans is apparently the most impressive feat of MoS in the movie.You keep going on and on about it being red paint, but where is your onscreen proof of it being referred as such, huh?
I already posted the pic where the symbol has clear indentations on its sidelines thereby indicating that it was carved instead of painted. Try to keep up.
When did I say that I hate Superman?
Where is your onscreen reference to it being a strength feat at all? Blowing up the mantle was never even alluded. I'm saying what I see on the screen, nothing else.
Which is ambiguous as ****. Blame CGI.
You've said it before IIRC. Now you're telling me you actually like Superman?
😂
Originally posted by abhilegend
No, the world engine was the best feat in the movie because we can actually see its effect as skyscrapers were crushed by its gravity beams.Where is your onscreen reference to it being a strength feat at all? Blowing up the mantle was never even alluded. I'm saying what I see on the screen, nothing else.
Which is ambiguous as ****. Blame CGI.
You've said it before IIRC. Now you're telling me you actually like Superman?
😂
A very bad rendering of a "No you!" response. Nevermind the fact that the evidence was posted a whole page ago.
What is ambiguous about the outlines on that heart-shaped carving? If you can't recognize indentations when you see 'em, then it's your problem. Not my fault you never paid attention in art/culpture class, lol.
Either bring up the post or shut the f*ck up. I am indifferent to Superman. My interest has always lain in the more powerful, cosmic-scale characters like Lucifer Morningstar, Galactus and the Celestials.
Originally posted by Epicurus
The employees of the Daily Planet, most notably Perry White, survived the destruction of the World Beam despite being in the zone.A very bad rendering of a "No you!" response. Nevermind the fact that the evidence was posted a whole page ago.
What is ambiguous about the outlines on that heart-shaped carving? If you can't recognize indentations when you see 'em, then it's your problem. Not my fault you never paid attention in art/culpture class, lol.
Either bring up the post or shut the f*ck up. I am indifferent to Superman. My interest has always lain in the more powerful, cosmic-scale characters like Lucifer Morningstar, Galactus and the Celestials.
A very ambiguous image=/=proof. Not surprising though.
So you've got nothing. Gotcha.
Thou mad bro?
😂
Why do people keep saying the World Engine was crushing Skyscrapers? Do people not know what that phrasing actually indicates?
The World Engine was increasing gravity in waves and Skyscrapers were falling over as I remember. You don't need to be an engineer to understand the vast difference between unbalance the support structureand actually crushing them.
Although Superman was on the other side of the beam, which was the one terraforming the atmosphere IIRC so I don't understand why the gravity potential of the other end keeps being mentioned. AND exaggerated. 😬
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Why do people keep saying the World Engine was crushing Skyscrapers? Do people not know what that phrasing actually indicates?The World Engine was increasing gravity in waves and Skyscrapers were falling over as I remember. You don't need to be an engineer to understand the vast difference between unbalance the support structureand actually crushing them.
Although Superman was on the other side of the beam, which was the one terraforming the atmosphere IIRC so I don't understand why the gravity potential of the other end keeps being mentioned. AND exaggerated. 😬
Matter was being destroyed either way, be it from increased gravity or the beam itself. It was causing disintegration on a molecular level. Man of Steel was also right in the middle of the beam of gravity which is why he could not move at first and had to over come it.
Originally posted by Epicurus It is red. Point proven.
How does it being red prove your point?
Also, the heart shape clearly looks like a carving instead of a paint job, as the indentations along the crevices so clearly indicate:
He might have indeed carved into the moon before painting it.
Now provide a time frame.
I accept your concession, Necrophiliac.
lol
Routhe Superman or anyone stronger stomp.
Originally posted by abhilegend
As usual you are spouting nonsense. Have you even watched the movie with all this gibberish about "Nam-Ek getting koed by bullets" and now Perry white being able to survive when cars were getting crushed like tissue paper? Go watch the movie you lazy bum.A very ambiguous image=/=proof. Not surprising though.
So you've got nothing. Gotcha.
Thou mad bro?
😂
Perry White and his crew were surviving in the middle of all those skyscrapers and infrastructure getting destroyed by the terraforming. Indisputable.
How the heck is it ambiguous? We clearly see the outlines on the image, we clearly see the indentations. Even if you want to claim that Hancock painted that symbol, that doesn't override the fact that said painting was done over gigantic carving, or Hancock being capable of carrying a lake's worth of red paint to the moon in a such a span of time that nobody noticed it until it he pointed it out?
The evidence was already posted. Try and keep up.
Not as mad as a certain insane Super-fan.
Originally posted by NemeBro
How does it being red prove your point?
Originally posted by NemeBro
He might have indeed carved into the moon before painting it.
Originally posted by NemeBro
Now provide a time frame.
So time frame is somewhere between a couple hours to at best a whole day.
Originally posted by NemeBro
lolRouthe Superman or anyone stronger stomp.