Originally posted by Psychotron
Yeah, obviously this was Obi-Wan at his (then) 100%. But I would think that Maul would pretty much always be running at peak efficiency due to the nature of his training.
Nah Sith also have their peak performances. For Maul it would be against Sidious after Savage died.
Originally posted by Psychotron
Vader didn't lose the whole of his limbs, only the parts under his elbows/knees. If it didn't hinder Maul that much, it shouldn't have hindered Vader either. And then there's Grevious.
Vader was carrying that huge chunk of machinery which Maul didn't have to. It was basically down to Vader needing life support. Grievous was all manchine. He wasn't carrying machine on top of his regular body. There wasn't much left at all of his body.
Originally posted by Robtard
GTFO with your non film nonsense. That's also different skilled chars compared to EP1 Maul and Ep3 Obi, son.
LOL TCW is canon to the films. Created by Lucas himself. In fact TCW Movie was a movie. It's like if we're talking Star Trek films, it would be perfectly legitimate to bring up Star Trek episodes as it's all a shared universe. Same with using Lady Sif feats from Agents of SHIELD.
The OP hasn't stated this is Episode 1 Maul. And even if he did, as Pschotron has noted TCW Maul was probably actually hindered by his cybernetic parts, not to mention he was out of training for 10+ years. So EPI Maul is not likely to be drastically less powerful than TCW Maul. Besides you want to compare characters in their prime don't you? Or just the heroes in their prime to make them win more easily Lol.