Star Trek 3 director
I am excited to see where my beloved nufranchise goes but am a little worried since Abrams isn't there anymore.
http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/05/14/roberto-orci-to-direct-star-trek-3
Star Trek 3 director
I am excited to see where my beloved nufranchise goes but am a little worried since Abrams isn't there anymore.
http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/05/14/roberto-orci-to-direct-star-trek-3
Originally posted by jaden101
I'm hoping they go for an entirely new story rather than a retelling of a previous film. No point in having a new divergent timeline if they're just going to use it to have slightly different versions of the original one.
Like you wouldn't want to see time-travel and whales again.
Originally posted by RobtardYouTube video
Like you wouldn't want to see time-travel and whales again.
Originally posted by jaden101Into Darkness was amazing and shared certain parallels to Wrath of a Khan. To me it was the nest of both worlds and really worked for me. I do agree I want to see the third film go into an entirely different direction. I'd love to see an intergalactic war with the Klingons done. If they get this done right I believe 2016 would be the 50th anniversary of Star Trek.
I'm hoping they go for an entirely new story rather than a retelling of a previous film. No point in having a new divergent timeline if they're just going to use it to have slightly different versions of the original one.
LOL "it paralleled Wrath of Khan". STFU you wannabe film analyst. You haven't seen WoK in your life, you mindless popcorn muncher. And no, ID was not "amazing". It was a mindless forgettable generic substance-lacking popcorn flick which only simple-minded sheep would hail as something "amazing".
Maybe this new director will make it that I will actually care about what's going on in the movie. Maybe make it exciting like Best of Both Worlds, instead of the suspense hinging on "Is main franchise star Kirk going to die? 🙄 "
Originally posted by Lestov16Khan wasn't on earth and was awoken in the space seed episode by Kirk. I watched both the episode and the film again around the time I saw into darkness. I never claimed to be a film analyst. I gave my opinion and you are full of rage.
LOL "it paralleled Wrath of Khan". STFU you wannabe film analyst. You haven't seen WoK in your life, you mindless popcorn muncher. And no, ID was not "amazing". It was a mindless forgettable generic substance-lacking popcorn flick which only simple-minded sheep would hail as something "amazing".Maybe this new director will make it that I will actually care about what's going on in the movie. Maybe make it exciting like Best of Both Worlds, instead of the suspense hinging on "Is main franchise star Kirk going to die? 🙄 "
Continue to say the movie stunk. Shatner praises and says J.J. Did what he never could.
“Then, along comes J.J., who gives the audience a ride with special effects and running and jumping. So the new ‘Star Trek’ movies have far outgrossed anything that we ever did. It’s. The. Ride.”
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/movies/william-shatner-abrams-thumbs-up-article-1.1776000
I am fully energized to rape any half wit who doubts anything I say based off of evidence. Shatner>>>you and he agrees with me.
🙂
Originally posted by dadudemonHe's very upset these days and unhappy. I feel bad for the kid tbh. I don't report people anyways. They report me out of rage and unhappiness in their own lives. They seek to blame me for their own problems.
My how KMC has changed. That would have gotten a warning or temp ban, in the past.
Originally posted by Lestov16He was the original Kirk. I have him fully endorsing the new Star Trek whereas you have no one save yourself to just moan about the new Treks. It is an objective statement they grossed more money than anything the older, boring, Treks produced. I produced evidence of the original Kirk actor supporting my opinion. You like your sex life have nothing.
The subjective opinion of the priceline mascot is supposed to be fact now? Cumberbytch mode is in full swing 😆You are right though, you are fully energized to rape 🙂
😂
Originally posted by Lestov16No, he doesn't. He admits Abrams did what he never could. Doesn't get any clearer than that.
Even in his 'compliment', he basically acknowledges the new trek films are shallow and only succeed in hollow mindless special effects and action.
Disney also believes in Abrams. You can continue to hate the man who clearly knows what he is doing.
Originally posted by Lestov16He is a great director and one in which the billion dollar franchise known as Star Wars is entrusted to. Saying he did a piss poor job on Star Trek is being illogical and ignoring the success he had with resurrecting the tired and washed up franchise.
Abrams is a better director than Shatner. Not exactly a difficult conclusion to come to.
Cry more.