Star Trek 3 director

Originally posted by quanchi112
Prove it. And don't you dare disrespect Shatner's intelligence. These new Treks are a lot more enjoyable and factually more successful. Figures you would turn on Shatner too and attempt to discredit him. You have no loyalty.

ST: The Motion Picture grossed 93mil (after production cost), or 303mil in 2014 dollars

Into Darkness grossed 283mil (after production cost), or 287mil in 2014 dollars.

303 > 287 or in other words: Math > you 🙂

You don't even like Shatner, bandwagonboi. But this thread is about the next coming film, so maybe stop derailing it with attention grabbing nonsense? Thanks.

Originally posted by Robtard
ST: The Motion Picture grossed 93mil (after production cost), or 303mil in 2014 dollars

Into Darkness grossed 283mil (after production cost), or 287mil in 2014 dollars.

303 > 287 or in other words: Math > you 🙂

You don't even like Shatner, bandwagonboi. But this thread is about the next coming film, so maybe stop derailing it with attention grabbing nonsense? Thanks.

Math and objectivity >>>you.

Dec 7, 1979 Star Trek: The Motion Picture $35,000,000 $11,926,421 $82,258,456 $139,000,000
Jun 4, 1982 Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan $12,000,000 $14,347,221 $79,912,963 $96,800,000
Jun 1, 1984 Star Trek III: The Search for Spock $18,000,000 $16,673,229 $76,471,046 $87,000,000
Nov 26, 1986 Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home $24,000,000 $16,881,888 $109,713,132 $133,000,000
Jun 9, 1989 Star Trek V: The Final Frontier $30,000,000 $17,375,648 $52,210,049 $70,200,000
Dec 6, 1991 Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country $27,000,000 $18,162,837 $74,888,996 $96,900,000
Nov 18, 1994 Star Trek: Generations $38,000,000 $23,116,394 $75,671,262 $120,000,000
Nov 22, 1996 Star Trek: First Contact $46,000,000 $30,716,131 $92,027,888 $150,000,000
Dec 11, 1998 Star Trek: Insurrection $70,000,000 $22,052,836 $70,187,658 $117,800,000
Dec 13, 2002 Star Trek: Nemesis $60,000,000 $18,513,305 $43,254,409 $67,312,826
May 8, 2009 Star Trek $140,000,000 $79,204,289 $257,730,019 $385,680,446
May 15, 2013 Star Trek Into Darkness $190,000,000 $70,165,559 $228,778,661 $466,978,661 Play

http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/franchise/Star-Trek

This is fun shooting down your bias. Shatner and I are right. You're clearly wrong. I never said I liked him but you twisting the numbers and acting like the man is an idiot is exposing the bias located inside you. It's disgusting.

Don't throw such complex math at Quan. He doesn't even know what inflation is.

Anyways, like I said, I hope this new film has some substance to it, rather than an over-bloated yet hollow plot.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You don't get ignore the worldwide numbers just because you're biased.

Math and objectivity >>>you.

Dec 7, 1979 Star Trek: The Motion Picture $35,000,000 $11,926,421 $82,258,456 $139,000,000
Jun 4, 1982 Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan $12,000,000 $14,347,221 $79,912,963 $96,800,000
Jun 1, 1984 Star Trek III: The Search for Spock $18,000,000 $16,673,229 $76,471,046 $87,000,000
Nov 26, 1986 Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home $24,000,000 $16,881,888 $109,713,132 $133,000,000
Jun 9, 1989 Star Trek V: The Final Frontier $30,000,000 $17,375,648 $52,210,049 $70,200,000
Dec 6, 1991 Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country $27,000,000 $18,162,837 $74,888,996 $96,900,000
Nov 18, 1994 Star Trek: Generations $38,000,000 $23,116,394 $75,671,262 $120,000,000
Nov 22, 1996 Star Trek: First Contact $46,000,000 $30,716,131 $92,027,888 $150,000,000
Dec 11, 1998 Star Trek: Insurrection $70,000,000 $22,052,836 $70,187,658 $117,800,000
Dec 13, 2002 Star Trek: Nemesis $60,000,000 $18,513,305 $43,254,409 $67,312,826
May 8, 2009 Star Trek $140,000,000 $79,204,289 $257,730,019 $385,680,446
May 15, 2013 Star Trek Into Darkness $190,000,000 $70,165,559 $228,778,661 $466,978,661 Play

http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/franchise/Star-Trek

This is fun shooting down your bias. Shatner and I are right. You're clearly wrong. I never said I liked him but you twisting the numbers and acting like the man is an idiot is exposing the bias located inside you. It's disgusting.

Those numbers support the numbers I posted 🙂

Too bad you don't understand that you deduct for production fees (as that's money lost, not earned) and adjust for inflation to get the accurate comparisons.🙂

eg, if a movie made 400mil but cost 401mil to produce, it's not a "success" 🙂

Now stop derailing the thread with your rants? Thanks.

Originally posted by Robtard
Those numbers support the numbers I posted 🙂

Too bad you don't understand that you deduct for production fees (as that's money lost, not earned) and adjust for inflation to get the accurate comparisons.🙂

eg, if a movie made 400mil but cost 401mil to produce, it's not a "success" 🙂

Now stop derailing the thread with your rants? Thanks.

🙂

Again, Quan doesn't understand anything about the economics of cinema. He thinks inflation is what you do to a balloon.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Don't throw such complex math at Quan. He doesn't even know what inflation is.

Anyways, like I said, I hope this new film has some substance to it, rather than an over-bloated yet hollow plot.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, you ignored worldwide numbers. You tried to twist it into domestic only and want to ignore Shatner's opinion and the overall numbers. That is called twisting evidence. Studios don't ignore worldwide box office.

🙂

What I linked/posted and what you posted matched numerically 🙂

You just don't understand production cost and inflation.

Now stop derailing the thread with your rants? Thanks.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Calm down DDM. It's not like you haven't pulled uncouth shit in the past 😖hifty:

I got warnings and threats of bans when I did that shit, though.

I like it that it is more relaxed around here, though. I prefer people to be able to post like you are doing.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I know the numbers support me not him. I posted proof as well. You don't ever seem to post any proof to back your claims.

Well Rob already posted direct evidence which contradicts your bullshit, and you're ignoring that. Not sure what I could post that would get a different response. But keep on wanking the hollow, themeless "NuTrek" films, you mindless little Cumberbytch 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
What I linked/posted and what you posted matched numerically 🙂

You just don't understand production cost and inflation.

Now stop derailing the thread with your rants? Thanks.

🙂

You tried twisting. I caught you. Quit disrespecting Shatner's intelligence.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Well Rob already posted direct evidence which contradicts your bullshit, and you're ignoring that. Not sure what I could post that would get a different response. But keep on wanking the hollow, themeless "NuTrek" films, you mindless little Cumberbytch 🙂

Quit being a baby, momma's boy.

So you are ignoring the evidence because you are too stupid to comprehend the evidence. Understood 👆

Originally posted by quanchi112
You posted domestic only while ignoring worldwide numbers. That is the truest indicator.

🙂

You tried twisting. I caught you. Quit disrespecting Shatner's intelligence.

From your post:

ST: The Motion Picture totals: 267mil, or 869.01 in 2014 dollars 🙂

ST: Into Darkness totals 534mil, or 541.65 in 2014 dollars 🙂

869.01 > 541.65 🙂

You lost again, condolences.

It was a smart move for JJ to give up Star Trek and expand Star Wars, now we will actual see some good Star Wars movies the way they should be.

Finally, Jar Jar becomes a Jedi Master!

Originally posted by Lestov16
So you are ignoring the evidence because you are too stupid to comprehend the evidence. Understood 👆

🙂

LOL, the butthurt oozes out of you like a volcano.

Originally posted by Robtard
From your post:

ST: The Motion Picture totals: 267mil, or 869.01 in 2014 dollars 🙂

ST: Into Darkness totals 534mil, or 541.65 in 2014 dollars 🙂

869.01 > 541.65 🙂

You lost again, condolences.

Shatner and the numbers>>>your distortions.

Don't you dare continue to insult Shatner's intelligence.

Shatner praises Abrams. “What he’s been able to do is bring in a new audience and revive the ‘Star Trek’ franchise to a large degree,” Shatner says. “I think everybody connected with ‘Star Trek’ is content with that.”

NuTrek vastly more successful than the old trek. Shatner approved.

Will and I win.

🙂

Originally posted by Lestov16
LOL, the butthurt oozes out of you like a volcano.