Originally posted by Robtard
Good job posting two vids of Kal not hurt, since there isn't a bruise, blemish or even a scratch on him 👆
He had to run to an old discussion we had days ago because he can't accept a loss on any account, so instead of conceding, he shifts the goal posts and asks for ruling on a old discussion.
Originally posted by Robtard
Good job posting two vids of Kal not hurt, since there isn't a scratch on him 👆
What a moron... You don't need to have a scratch to be hurt. You can get hit in the stomach and have no outside injuries showing what so ever but have internal issues. It's clear you're dumb, but I didn't think this dumb. I'll define the words for you.. which by the way.. aren't limited to having a scratch LOL
cause physical pain or injury to
synonyms: injure, wound, damage, abuse, disable, incapacitate, maim, mutilate, wrench; More
Notice the words there.. You can wrench your back but not have a bruise or any sign of injury. Notice incapacitate.. ya know like exactly how he was lying face down.. not able to respond or defend himself. Abuse... Faora, Zod.. Nam all abused him. Why would you looked stunned and dazed when they flipped him over if he was totally unharmed. We see him take punches and continue to fight.. when he's lying face first not fighting back or responding till moved. He's been hurt.
How about immune to attack - Well if he was truly immune to attack he'd take all those blows and not bat an eye.. he would by lying face down motionless after being kicked.
How about injure
Full Definition of INJURE
transitive verb
1
a : to do an injustice to : wrong
b : to harm, impair, or tarnish the standing of <injured his reputation>
c : to give pain to <injure a person's pride>
2
a : to inflict bodily hurt on
b : to impair the soundness of <injured her health>
c : to inflict material damage or loss on
— in·jur·er \ˈin-jər-ər\ noun
Yup that fits also...
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
He had to run to an old discussion we had days ago because he can't accept a loss on any account, so instead of conceding, he shifts the goal posts and asks for ruling on a old discussion.
You brought the mod here Time... don't think I didn't notice that or know it was you. So don't complain about a thing when it comes to bringing a mod. Neither you nor Robbie conceded the point that Kal was about to be hurt or harm caused to him. You never conceded the point. Do you now? Robbie hasn't and still says he's invulnerable.
If you'd like I could have a mod ruling on whether Kal sank or not.. since Robbie still hasn't conceded that point. Shall I do that as well? You already admitted he did, and laughed at the notion that someone would say he didn't sink. Should I get a ruling there to?
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
What a moron... You don't need to have a scratch to be hurt. You can get hit in the stomach and have no outside injuries showing what so ever but have internal issues. It's clear you're dumb, but I didn't think this dumb. I'll define the words for you.. which by the way.. aren't limited to having a scratch LOLcause physical pain or injury to
synonyms: injure, wound, damage, abuse, disable, incapacitate, maim, mutilate, wrench; More
Notice the words there.. You can wrench your back but not have a bruise or any sign of injury. Notice incapacitate.. ya know like exactly how he was lying face down.. not able to respond or defend himself. Abuse... Faora, Zod.. Nam all abused him. Why would you looked stunned and dazed when they flipped him over if he was totally unharmed. We see him take punches and continue to fight.. when he's lying face first not fighting back or responding till moved. He's been hurt.
How about immune to attack - Well if he was truly immune to attack he'd take all those blows and not bat an eye.. he would by lying face down motionless after being kicked.
How about injure
Full Definition of INJURE
transitive verb
1
a : to do an injustice to : wrong
b : to harm, impair, or tarnish the standing of <injured his reputation>
c : to give pain to <injure a person's pride>
2
a : to inflict bodily hurt on
b : to impair the soundness of <injured her health>
c : to inflict material damage or loss on
— in·jur·er \ˈin-jər-ər\ nounYup that fits also...
LoL! Look how mad I've made you. But show proof that Kal suffered internal injuries while showing no external injuries or accept that you've once again made a claim you can't support
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Neither you nor Robbie conceded the point that Kal was about to be hurt or harm caused to him. You never conceded the point. Do you now? Robbie hasn't and still says he's invulnerable.
I would laugh if you could quote me saying or taking the stance he wasn't hurt. I would really laugh.
I said invulnerable was loosely used term by both Marvel and DC meaning extremely hard to kill. I used multiple examples of them using them and you danced and ran from the argument. I even went on to say that they considered the Living tribunal invulnerable and look what happened to him. Shall I post those gain?
Dance all you want, try quoting something that don't exist. I dare you😂
Are you just too mixed up with your stories?
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
But even the Living Tribunal has been killed, and he is supposedly invulnerable.Marvel even says no weakness. That means invulnerable, but now he's dead.
http://marvel.wikia.com/Living_Tribunal_%28Multiverse%29Your putting to much pressure on the word when not even comic writers do.
Boom, You ran like a bat outa hell from this.
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Invulnerability has been applies to like ever single comic character like Superman, Thanos, Zeus, Living Tribunal, even Cosmic Armor Superman was destroyed, so they all end up hurt right, no matter how strong they are.Invulnerability is a loosely used term for extremely hard to kill or severely injury.
Invulnerability applies to Superman in comics and applies to him in movies and shows as well.
He was show to be temporarily dazed in the water but had no reason to get up and do anything, he saved the people, he obviously could not swim back the ship he just jumped off of to save the people and reveal his secret, so what did he do? He listened to the whales. He didn't have any where else pressing to be and that gave the director time in the movie to show back story on him in his childhood.
Moving on.
When Faora and Namek hit him, he should have been killed yes? The fact that he was only momentarily dazed, getting back up means more then staying down in a fight? He went on to whoop some more ass every time. That was his first super powered fight he had ever been in. Notice how his next fight with Zod there was none of that?
Originally posted by Robtard
LoL! Look how mad I've made you. But show proof that Kal suffered internal injuries while showing no external injuries or accept that you've once again made a claim you can't support
Exactly, He never suffer internal injuries, nor broken bones, he showed be temporarily slowed down and stunned. I am clueless as to how that means he is hurt.
If I break my leg sky diving, I can hurt and can no longer skydive.
If I break my hand working, I can no longer work with that hand.
Where was Kal broken or hurt that he could no longer fight, fly or shoot fire out his eye's?
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Boom, You ran like a bat outa hell from this.
I'm starting to think you have no clue what you're talking about. How could I run from a topic I crushed you on? That's what of the biggest cases of bs EVER.
YOU made the claim that superman was invulnerable... You had NO idea in comics he'd been cut and bleeding.. he's been KO'd... shit he's been pierced clean through his body. You had NO idea these things even happened in comics and I had to point them out to you. if he was TRULY invulnerable like you claim NONE of those things would happen to him. ONCE I pointed this out YOU moved the goalposts and said well I was using that term loosely. You ADMITTED superman wasn't truly invulnerable. Yet, not it seems you're claiming he is. IF he was invulnerable in the movie.. he would be laying face down... not moving.. and when he's finally rolled over via assistance he's stunned and dazed and can't defend himself. That outright shows he's not invulnerable. period, end of story.
Originally posted by Robtard
LoL! Look how mad I've made you. But show proof that Kal suffered internal injuries while showing no external injuries or accept that you've once again made a claim you can't support
You've already been OWNED severely on this topic. YOU CLAIMED in order to be hurt you had to have a scratch on you. I can quote you clownshoes and that is EXACTLY what you said. However, I POSTED the definition of hurt... and there are many things that don't require a scratch. As I illustrated... you can wrench your back and show no scratch. THAT RIGHT THERE OWNS YOU AND I WOUDL NEED TO SAY NO MORE. You made the claim that a scratch needed to be produced to show he was hurt. You've been owned again. You can be hurt and not have a scratch on you. How about other words that fit what happened to him.
Abuse - He was being tossed around like a weak feeb as well as slapped around. Abuse
Incapacitate or disable - he was laying face first not moving or responding on two separate occasions as well as sinking while KO'd
Immune to attack - How could he be if he was laying face down and not responding. If he was immune to the attack he'd bounce right back up and continue fighting. He didn't, instead he got put down like a feeb and didn't respond.
How about injure - well many words fit there... To inflict bodily harm on - Yup, I've posted videos showing Kal having a pained expression on his face after taking a blow. So Zod and company did inflict harm on superman.
To give pain to - again superman's pained expression on his face. If you wanna see true invulnerability. Watch superman with George Reeves stand there with his chest out and not move and inch with bullets and show NO pain. Superman shows plenty signs of pain.
I could keep going on and on with words that fit what happened to superman. OWNED AGAIN Robbie. For what, the 50th time.
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Now that's it not April fools can you be serious?
ANSWER the question is SUPERMAN INVULNERABLE in comics? Let's start there since that was your claim that I had to crush. Honestly carefully Time as I'll have issue quoting where you said superman was invulnerable... Then quote YOU saying ohhh well I was using that term loosely. THAT TERM BY DEFINITION isn't a loose one. It's very clear and defined. Superman isn't invulnerable TRUE OR NO?
You also made the claim that their battle suits were tied to their aura and this came from comcs (something I'll also have no issue quoting you on) Only that doesn't come from comics. That's never even shown to be so in comics. You have a comic showing that, post it, if not concede you have no clue what you're talking about.
This is Exactly how the convo went down. Just because you don't know how to define invulnerable isn't my problem. You either don't know how to define it or have no idea about superman comics. Maybe both.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
I'm starting to think you have no clue what you're talking about. How could I run from a topic I crushed you on? That's what of the biggest cases of bs EVER.YOU made the claim that superman was invulnerable... You had NO idea in comics he'd been cut and bleeding.. he's been KO'd... shit he's been pierced clean through his body. You had NO idea these things even happened in comics and I had to point them out to you. if he was TRULY invulnerable like you claim NONE of those things would happen to him. ONCE I pointed this out YOU moved the goalposts and said well I was using that term loosely. You ADMITTED superman wasn't truly invulnerable. Yet, not it seems you're claiming he is. IF he was invulnerable in the movie.. he would be laying face down... not moving.. and when he's finally rolled over via assistance he's stunned and dazed and can't defend himself. That outright shows he's not invulnerable. period, end of story.
Get over the definition. The dictionary won't save you.
I had no idea superman has been cut before, your kidding right? So I never read death of superman. Lol. Baseless claims.
Living Trubunal is invuneravle and he was killed. I guess you didn't read that one.
You talk nonsense.
Originally posted by Robtard
Good job posting two vids of Kal not 'wounded, injured, or harmed' , since there isn't a bruise, blemish or even a scratch on him 👆
This is what YOU CLAIMED needed to be showed for him to be hurt, harmed or injured. This was YOUR definition for it. I never said Kal suffered internal injuries QUOTE ME ANY PLACE saying that shortbus.
How I totally OWNED you with ease is pointing out that one (not superman Mr. slow can't read basic sentences guy) could have internal injuries and have no scratch or blemish on them. That SIMPLE point crushes your stance because it shows you don't need to bleed or cut or a blemish and can still be harmed or hurt. THAT IS ALL I NEEDED TO DO TO CRUSH YOUR STANCE.
However, I went further in owning and defined the words and showed how many things fit EXACTLY to what we saw happen to superman. Conclusively proving he hurt and harmed or injured gong by the definitions. God it's so easy owning you.