Superman (Man of Steel) vs Godzilla (2014)

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Get over the definition. The dictionary won't save you.

I had no idea superman has been cut before, your kidding right? So I never read death of superman. Lol. Baseless claims.

Living Trubunal is invuneravle and he was killed. I guess you didn't read that one.

You talk nonsense.

THAT IS THE DEFINTION.. .What is there to get over. Just because you have no clue how to define OR what it means isn't my fault. Just because you and others don't know how to properly use it in a sentence isn't my problem. I don't care what handbooks say or what narration says. Feats mean everything, not flowery language. Superman isn't invulnerable PERIOD end of story.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
This is what YOU CLAIMED needed to be showed for him to be hurt, harmed or injured. This was YOUR definition for it. I never said Kal suffered internal injuries QUOTE ME ANY PLACE saying that shortbus.

How I totally OWNED you with ease is pointing out that one (not superman Mr. slow can't read basic sentences guy) could have internal injuries and have no scratch or blemish on them. That SIMPLE point crushes your stance because it shows you don't need to bleed or cut or a blemish and can still be harmed or hurt. THAT IS ALL I NEEDED TO DO TO CRUSH YOUR STANCE.

However, I went further in owning and defined the words and showed how many things fit EXACTLY to what we saw happen to superman. Conclusively proving he hurt and harmed or injured gong by the definitions. God it's so easy owning you.

Stopped reading after the first paragraph as it's clear you're lying and ranting again.

But here you go, where you implied Kal suffered internal injuries since you failed to produce a scene where he was physically damaged:

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
What a moron... You don't need to have a scratch to be hurt. You can get hit in the stomach and have no outside injuries showing what so ever but have internal issues.

If you're now saying Kal didn't suffer any internal injuries, then you just sodomized your own previous argument and have nothing to stand on. LoL! Too easy.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
ANSWER the question is SUPERMAN INVULNERABLE in comics? Let's start there since that was your claim that I had to crush. Honestly carefully Time as I'll have issue quoting where you said superman was invulnerable... Then quote YOU saying ohhh well I was using that term loosely. THAT TERM BY DEFINITION isn't a loose one. It's very clear and defined. Superman isn't invulnerable TRUE OR NO?

You also made the claim that their battle suits were tied to their aura and this came from comcs (something I'll also have no issue quoting you on) Only that doesn't come from comics. That's never even shown to be so in comics. You have a comic showing that, post it, if not concede you have no clue what you're talking about.

This is Exactly how the convo went down. Just because you don't know how to define invulnerable isn't my problem. You either don't know how to define it or have no idea about superman comics. Maybe both.

By factual definition, no, but by comics yes.

Since when did comic writers care about words so much. It's factually written he is invuneravle on comic terms. In dictionary terms no. However this is fiction and we are in the realm of the comic verse so standard term for the word does not apply. Keep dodging about the living tribunal dying as well even though he is invunerable.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
THAT IS THE DEFINTION.. .What is there to get over. Just because you have no clue how to define OR what it means isn't my fault. Just because you and others don't know how to properly use it in a sentence isn't my problem. I don't care what handbooks say or what narration says. Feats mean everything, not flowery language. Superman isn't invulnerable PERIOD end of story.

It's not up to you to decide its up p the writers, when did you become a writer ER for DC or Marvel.

Again how did the living tribunal die? You keep dodging this.

Anyone can die in comics regardless of invulnerability, you should know that if a higher power comes in the person who is invunerable to everything below him will die once he has been outclasses. This is literal common sense in comics.

Originally posted by Robtard
Stopped reading after the first paragraph as it's clear you're lying and ranting again.

But here you go, where you implied Kal suffered internal injuries since you failed to produce a scene where he was physically damaged:

If you're now saying Kal didn't suffer any internal injuries, then you just sodomized your own previous argument and have nothing to stand on. LoL! Too easy.

I love when I own you so bad you come back with stopped reading so you don't have to reply to the context of the post. Yet, we all know you read it.

YOU defined it as such and saying there wasn't a scratch on kal nor any sign of harm. I CONCLUSIVELY PROVED you don't need a scratch or a bruise to be injured or harmed. I simply pointed out you could wrench your back and have no sign of visible injury... no bruise.. no cut.. yet your still hurt and injured. GAME OVER RIGHT THERE LMAO. However, just to crush you as easily as I have and continue to do so.. I again pointed out ANOTHER EXAMPLE that you could have internal injuries and be hurt or injured but not have a single cut. Those were all ways to CRUSH your definition.. and I did so EASILY. God I love owning you so easily .

Fact: You failed to provide a single scene where Kal was 'wounded, injured, or harmed'

Fact: You implied that Kal suffered "internal injuries" and then ran away like a coward when asked for proof

He can't come up with an answer for on panel evidence of higher powers dying however them being called invunerable. We can't expect him to come up with a reasonable explanation for Superman either. He's ignored every post of me showing how other invunerable beings end up dead.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
\

I love when I own you so bad you come back with stopped reading so you don't have to reply to the context of the post. Yet, we all know you read it.

YOU defined it as such and saying there wasn't a scratch on kal nor any sign of harm. I CONCLUSIVELY PROVED you don't need a scratch or a bruise to be injured or harmed. I simply pointed out you could wrench your back and have no sign of visible injury... no bruise.. no cut.. yet your still hurt and injured. GAME OVER RIGHT THERE LMAO. However, just to crush you as easily as I have and continue to do so.. I again pointed out ANOTHER EXAMPLE that you could have internal injuries and be hurt or injured but not have a single cut. Those were all ways to CRUSH your definition.. and I did so EASILY. God I love owning you so easily .

Ah but you never proved he had internal injuries. Was cut or bruised or broken in any way.

KT's a coward who breaks like weathered and worn wicker before my implacable iron-like will

Originally posted by Robtard

Fact: You implied that Kal suffered "internal injuries" and then ran away like a coward when asked for proof

Asking for proof from you to supplement his argument. 😆 😆 😆

Originally posted by Robtard
Fact: You failed to provide a single scene where Kal was 'wounded, injured, or harmed'

Fact: You implied that Kal suffered "internal injuries" and then ran away like a coward when asked for proof

It's so easy owning you.. THIS is what I said

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
What a moron... You don't need to have a scratch to be hurt. You can get hit in the stomach and have no outside injuries showing what so ever but have internal issues. It's clear you're dumb, but I didn't think this dumb. I'll define the words for you.. which by the way.. aren't limited to having a scratch LOL

cause physical pain or injury to

synonyms: injure, wound, damage, abuse, disable, incapacitate, maim, mutilate, wrench; More

Notice the words there.. You can wrench your back but not have a bruise or any sign of injury. Notice incapacitate.. ya know like exactly how he was lying face down.. not able to respond or defend himself. Abuse... Faora, Zod.. Nam all abused him. Why would you looked stunned and dazed when they flipped him over if he was totally unharmed. We see him take punches and continue to fight.. when he's lying face first not fighting back or responding till moved. He's been hurt.

How about immune to attack - Well if he was truly immune to attack he'd take all those blows and not bat an eye.. he would by lying face down motionless after being kicked.

How about injure

Full Definition of INJURE

transitive verb

1

a : to do an injustice to : wrong

b : to harm, impair, or tarnish the standing of <injured his reputation>

c : to give pain to <injure a person's pride>

2

a : to inflict bodily hurt on

b : to impair the soundness of <injured her health>

c : to inflict material damage or loss on
— in·jur·er \&#712;in-j&#601;r-&#601;r\ noun

Yup that fits also...

As clear as day is said you.. key word there is you.. never said superman.. never said Kal. I was simply CRUSHING your definition. Quote me saying superman sustained internal injuries or you're a liar. However, since I'm quoting this post that owned you yet again. It clearly lists the definition of the words you used

Harmed.. injured... hurt... and they ALL fit... Each has words that apply to what happened to Kal.

To molest.. they did so
To inflict bodily harm - they did so and left him lying on the ground like w weak feeb
to incapacitate - again lying on the floor like a feeb or sink in the ocean
to disable - same as above
how about immune to damage or harm - nope he couldn't be or he wouldn't be lying on the ground like a feeb

to give pain to - yup again, just see Kal with a pained expression on his face from being smacked around like a feeb.

I only needed ONE of those to crush your argument and fit.. happens to be I have way more than that. OWNED

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
He can't come up with an answer for on panel evidence of higher powers dying however them being called invunerable. We can't expect him to come up with a reasonable explanation for Superman either. He's ignored every post of me showing how other invunerable beings end up dead.

Are you trying to be a dunce on purpose? I'm being serious here. I never said a thing about the LT.. it doesn't matter WHAT bio or narration has called him invulnerable. FEATS are what matters most on the vs forum and here. NOT flowery language saying somebody in invulnerable. That is worth nothing unless they have feats backing that up 100% of the time. If not, as you concede they aren't truly invulnerable. Period. How is the basic logic and English wording beyond you right now? You keep acting like the LT dying helps your argument. It doesn't. It just proves he's also not invulnerable. If TOAA says he dies... he dies. Period. He's not invulnerable

Originally posted by Robtard
KT's a coward who breaks like weathered and worn wicker before my implacable iron-like will

So easy owning you in thread after thread. Yet again, owned here again. Time even admits superman isn't invulnerable LMAO. Damn your biggest cheerleader doesn't even agree with you. BWHAHAHA

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
It's so easy owning you.. THIS is what I said

As clear as day is said you.. key word there is you.. never said superman.. never said Kal. I was simply CRUSHING your definition. Quote me saying superman sustained internal injuries or you're a liar. However, since I'm quoting this post that owned you yet again. It clearly lists the definition of the words you used

Harmed.. injured... hurt... and they ALL fit... Each has words that apply to what happened to Kal.

To molest.. they did so
To inflict bodily harm - they did so and left him lying on the ground like w weak feeb
to incapacitate - again lying on the floor like a feeb or sink in the ocean
to disable - same as above
how about immune to damage or harm - nope he couldn't be or he wouldn't be lying on the ground like a feeb

to give pain to - yup again, just see Kal with a pained expression on his face from being smacked around like a feeb.

I only needed ONE of those to crush your argument and fit.. happens to be I have way more than that. OWNED

No it didnt

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
It's so easy owning you.. THIS is what I said

As clear as day is said you.. key word there is you.. never said superman.. never said Kal. I was simply CRUSHING your definition. Quote me saying superman sustained internal injuries or you're a liar. However, since I'm quoting this post that owned you yet again. It clearly lists the definition of the words you used

Harmed.. injured... hurt... and they ALL fit... Each has words that apply to what happened to Kal.

To molest.. they did so
To inflict bodily harm - they did so and left him lying on the ground like w weak feeb
to incapacitate - again lying on the floor like a feeb or sink in the ocean
to disable - same as above
how about immune to damage or harm - nope he couldn't be or he wouldn't be lying on the ground like a feeb

to give pain to - yup again, just see Kal with a pained expression on his face from being smacked around like a feeb.

I only needed ONE of those to crush your argument and fit.. happens to be I have way more than that. OWNED

I've now forced you to concede that Kal didn't suffer any "internal injuries" and you have yet to show a single scene/still where Kal was actually visibly injured. You literally have no support to your "Superman was injured" claim. LoL! Too easy.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Are you trying to be a dunce on purpose? I'm being serious here. I never said a thing about the LT.. it doesn't matter WHAT bio or narration has called him invulnerable. FEATS are what matters most on the vs forum and here. NOT flowery language saying somebody in invulnerable. That is worth nothing unless they have feats backing that up 100% of the time. If not, as you concede they aren't truly invulnerable. Period. How is the basic logic and English wording beyond you right now? You keep acting like the LT dying helps your argument. It doesn't. It just proves he's also not invulnerable. If TOAA says he dies... he dies. Period. He's not invulnerable

Ah but see you are not a writer in the comic verse, so the process alludes you.