@The_Merchant
Since the quote function is again not working properly...
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Aven...ote-SpecPlate-0Mass
359,000 mt (Deadweight)[1]
892,000mt/KPa/atm (Displacement)[1]
MT is Megatonnage btw.
I'd say, somebody had clearly no idea about real-life physics, considering he sets mt = kPa, where kPa is a force of 1000 kg being applied on one squaremeter per second. In short: If I'm not totally mistaken, those two units are an order of magnitude apart, with the lesser probably being the correct one.
Pushing, altering, etc. Regardless of the terminology He moved the SD in some way, that isn't debatable. Meaning even moving it barely by a meter off its original course leads to the massive amount of energy the calculator gives.http://www.narutoforums.com/blog.php?b=21942
This is the original calculation, difference between mine and it is that he uses an extremely low-end mass for a Star Destroyer rather than what the canon states it is. I even showed it to him and said the values should be much higher than what he got thanks to this source. In fact, plugging in the number he got for the falling speed of the SD with the mass I listed would yield roughly 7 Teratons of Kinetic Energy.
Since the number above is obviously false, I doubt the "canon" thing very much.
The calculation is clearly false, though.
1)
Rather than calculating the actual volume of the Star Destroyer, he calculates the volume of a large block with the height, width and length of the Star Destroyer, completely ignoring it's actual shape.
2)
He assumes that the Star Destroyer is moving with terminal velocity. Which is completely senseless. This would require a 13 minute fall through the planets atmosphere, which obviously didn't happen. And, of course, the impact generated by the Star Destroyer at that kind of velocity would deal by far more damage then what is seen in the game and the novel. Furthermore, he ignores the fact, that at terminal velocity, the acceleration of the object would be 0, which means that even very small changes in acceleration would have a visible effect, which is even stated in the novel: "...even a small acceleration had a profound effect on such a large scale." But Starkiller doesn't alter the acceleration - he mereley alters the positioning of the Star Destroyer relative to the atmosphere.
3)
He gives the example in "joules", which are still energy exerted per second without taking the fact into account, that Marek obviously needed several minutes to perform his feat.
4)
He, much like you, attributes this to Marek's personal strength in the Force, which is obviously false:
"The Force didn't recognize big or small, heavy or light, hard or easy. The living flows of the galaxy encompassed all scales, from the very small to the extremely large. The Star Destroyer was part of it, and so was he. The Force bound them as surely as gravity. He could make its invisible muscles flex, if he dared." - The Force Unleashed, Chapter 30.
Emphasis mine. It is pretty clear, that this feat is not based upon Marek's own personal Force power, but on influencing the Force directly. Something that he would never be able to replicate in combat. Hence his struggle with people he faced in personal confrontation.
However, Galen Marek has another much better feat:http://www.narutoforums.com/blog.php?b=21981
He powers a cannon with his own energies that were used to split apart a Star Destroyer, slicing through its shields and all. Considering that you seem knowledgeable about SW tech, I assume you would know how impressive this feat is. For those who aren't:
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Impe..._Star_Destroyer
Power output
Peak: >9,28 × 1024 W[7] (over 20% more power than the ISD-I)[8][9]
That's roughly two Petatons of firepower to bring down a Star destroyers' shields. Here's another in-depth calculation for it:
http://www.narutoforums.com/blog.php?b=21981
Equally senseless because of the false assumptions.
1)
Marek just "revives" the weapons original generators, rather then generating all the energy himself.
2)
We have absolutely no idea how that weapon works. For all we know, it merely fires through shields, much like the ion cannons in ESB.
3)
The feat in question is no part of the TFU II novel, which means it is not canon anyway...
Despite these two feats, Starkiller has shown the ability to destroy AT-ST's/AT-ATs, blasting through a Correlian frigate (I actually think he vaporized half of it although I'm not so sure) survived temps equal to the surfaces of stars, force pushed an army of droids, and a bunch of other feats that I can't really recall rn.
You may want to check how much of the stuff does actually happen in the novels, which are the canon representation of the TFU events.
Trying to downplay by saying that his combat performances don't match those feats is straw-grasping. The opposite could be true, that being the enemies he fights are simply that strong. Shouldn't be too surprising, Shaak Tis' presence held back the Dark side from enveloping Felucia hold, only other feat similar to that I can think of would be Thons' feat of sealing Ambrias' Sith spirits in Lake Nath and he had to employ a trick to do so. She is an example of the power Marek confronts.
Hardly. Trying to put his feats into perspective is necessary to find out how he would perform in an actual fight. And if his TK / Lightning were that strong, he wouldn't struggle with certain obstacles in his way as much as he does.