Frieza attacks Super Saiyan 3 Goku/Super Saiyan 2 Gohan

Started by yungz226 pages

Idk just because someone can bust a planet that doesnt equate to them having the same durability

Originally posted by yungz22
Idk just because someone can bust a planet that doesnt equate to them having the same durability

Did you not see any of the scans I just posted? If someone can shoot a planet busting attack, and the person they're fighting tanks it, then shoots an equally powered blast which is tanked by the first person, then coincidentally, person one can tank planet busters.

I mean, this is first grade logic that you're blatantly failing to grasp here.

Originally posted by SSJGGogeta
Did you not see any of the scans I just posted? If someone can shoot a planet busting attack, and the person they're fighting tanks it, then shoots an equally powered blast which is tanked by the first person, then coincidentally, person one can tank planet busters.

I mean, this is first grade logic that you're blatantly failing to grasp here.

Where was it stated that those were pb's

Recoome didnt tank vegetas attack he took damage

Frieza deflected the blast which i already said they could

Tanking is when you recieve no damage

Originally posted by Bentley
Destructo Disk kills both. Frieza reigns supreme.

Originally posted by yungz22
Where was it stated that those were pb's

Recoome didnt tank vegetas attack he took damage

Frieza deflected the blast which i already said they could

Tanking is when you recieve no damage

All of those were either stated to be so, or they can be scaled with common sense to be. DodGamn.

Which I already said. He got phucked the hell up, but he still tanked a multi-planet buster.

Frieza tanked it with his foot. Got a problem?

Which none of them but Recoome did.

Originally posted by Bentley

Goku and Gohan laugh at Freeza and proceed to shove their fist in his mouth.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Goku and Gohan laugh at Freeza and proceed to shove their fist in his mouth.

Well the thread isn't "who would win", it's "can Goku tank this shiiitt??!!1".

Either way, I'm sure if he can scream away one of Nappa's strongest attacks, with a power level of demonstrably less than twice that of Nappa's, then he could easily do the same to Frieza, who is less than about 1/50th of SSJ Goku's strength at this point.

Originally posted by SSJGGogeta
All of those were either stated to be so, or they can be scaled with common sense to be. DodGamn.

Which I already said. He got phucked the hell up, but he still tanked a multi-planet buster.

Frieza tanked it with his foot. Got a problem?

Which none of them but Recoome did.

Wheres the scans that say they were pb's

If you take the time to deflect something that means if you didnt deflect it it would have harmed him.

Recoome took damage from vegetas blast it wasnt life threatining but damage is still damage his hair was all messed up he was bleeding and he lost teeth

Originally posted by yungz22
Wheres the scans that say they were pb's

If you take the time to deflect something that means if you didnt deflect it it would have harmed him.

Recoome took damage from vegetas blast it wasnt life threatining but damage is still damage his hair was all messed up he was bleeding and he lost teeth

1. dontgetit Refer to above post.

2. dontgetit And if I take the time to put ice in my glass, it means I couldn't drink my water otherwise. Clearly.

3. dontgetit Duh. What did I just say?

You said they were stated as pb's so where and who said that.....and Scaling is speculation and can be wrong. Especially if talking about attack potency. Statements are the only factual evidence we have when it come to gauging attack potency. In essence unless they say its a pb you cant say it is.

That analogy isnt the same thing water is something you consume. Its different when refering to fighting scenarios.

A fighters objective is usually to take less damGe but at the same time find a way to damage your opponent. Thats the reason floyd mayweather jr is undefeated hes a mAster at deflecting and countering opponent attacks. That doesnt mean that floyd mayweather can take full blown punch without recieving damage or get hurt. This goes for any fighting scenario if it can hurt you you either dodge or deflect.

Then recoome didnt tank it

Originally posted by yungz22
You said they were stated as pb's so where and who said that.....and Scaling is speculation and can be wrong. Especially if talking about attack potency. Statements are the only factual evidence we have when it come to gauging attack potency. In essence unless they say its a pb you cant say it is.

That analogy isnt the same thing water is something you consume. Its different when refering to fighting scenarios.

A fighters objective is usually to take less damGe but at the same time find a way to damage your opponent. Thats the reason floyd mayweather jr is undefeated hes a mAster at deflecting and countering opponent attacks. That doesnt mean that floyd mayweather can take full blown punch without recieving damage or get hurt. This goes for any fighting scenario if it can hurt you you either dodge or deflect.

Then recoome didnt tank it

So if a sniper rifle has more force distributed into the bullet, you can't say that it is able to pierce more than a 9mm pistol, despite heaps of evidence suggesting otherwise? You're about to make me start questioning reality itself, because of how silly your garbage argument is turning out to be. Not to mention that they were stated as such in the anime.

Uh, in a way, don't you consume damage? You certainly intake it. That analogy was pretty solid, too bad it was wasted on a glorified troglodyte such as yourself. 😬

I don't care to know who that idiot is, but we're talking about someone on a higher plane of power than the person they're fighting altogether. If Floyd Mayweather, or whatever, could tank countless punches to the face from his opponent and laugh them off, don't you think he would? And if he was blood-lusted, like all of these characters are, he most certainly would, if to do nothing more than instill terror.

He did. Just as I said. He tanked it, albeit while receiving some pretty extensive damage, he still tanked a planet buster+ attack.

I swear tanking means that someone Superman'd a bullet?

Originally posted by BloodRain
I swear tanking means that someone Superman'd a bullet?

Basically thats wwhat it means the opponent takes zero damage

Originally posted by SSJGGogeta
So if a sniper rifle has more force distributed into the bullet, you can't say that it is able to pierce more than a 9mm pistol, despite heaps of evidence suggesting otherwise? You're about to make me start questioning reality itself, because of how silly your garbage argument is turning out to be. Not to mention that they were stated as such in the anime.

Uh, in a way, don't you consume damage? You certainly intake it. That analogy was pretty solid, too bad it was wasted on a glorified troglodyte such as yourself. 😬

I don't care to know who that idiot is, but we're talking about someone on a higher plane of power than the person they're fighting altogether. If Floyd Mayweather, or whatever, could tank countless punches to the face from his opponent and laugh them off, don't you think he would? And if he was blood-lusted, like all of these characters are, he most certainly would, if to do nothing more than instill terror.

He did. Just as I said. He tanked it, albeit while receiving some pretty extensive damage, he still tanked a planet buster+ attack.

Lol you just proved his point in your third paragraph. If they could just tank it they would instead of deflecting it or running away.

Lol recoome didnt tank the attack he recieved damage.

Tanking is when you recieve none what soever

Originally posted by chasedown
Lol you just proved his point in your third paragraph. If they could just tank it they would instead of deflecting it or running away.

Lol recoome didnt tank the attack he recieved damage.

Tanking is when you recieve none what soever

In case you didn't notice, a planet busting ki bomb is a little different than a 500 PSI punch.

Lol what did I just say, dumb ass?

Tanking is when you survive the full brunt of something. There is literally no such thing as taking "no damage". Except in cases such as when Hercule elbowed Buu in the head as hard as he could, and Buu didn't notice.

Literally no such thing except for these dozens of examples?

It's easy; Shrug off = tank.

Originally posted by SSJGGogeta

Tanking is when you survive the full brunt of something.

So by your definition does that mean cell tanked vegeta's ff and goku's instant kamehameha?

Your example of hercule and buu was right tho thats tanking. Another example is when radditz took piccolo's blast that was tanking. Another example even tho it isnt canon is when brolly tanked goku's point blank kamehameha.

Merely surviving an attack is not tanking it. All examples i named above including your hercule one are examples of tanking

Originally posted by chasedown
Tanking is when you recieve none what soever

I view "tanking" as receiving little to no damage.

For instance, letting someone punch you in the face and not getting knocked, phased, or anything (except a sore face) would be tanking that punch, imao (imao - in my arrogant opinion).

Also, I believe the term "tanking", in this context, comes from the oooold Dungeons and Dragons games where you build a class that has enough HP to tank most attacks. Sure, your character suffers damage but it can "tank" the attacks. They are called tanks because a tank, the vehicle, can take a pounding before experiencing a failure. Sure, the tank can take damage (to the armor or whatever), but it may still be functional. This is where I got the idea that tanking is "little to no damage."

Originally posted by dadudemon
I view "tanking" as receiving little to no damage.

For instance, letting someone punch you in the face and not getting knocked, phased, or anything (except a sore face) would be tanking that punch, imao (imao - in my arrogant opinion).

Also, I believe the term "tanking", in this context, comes from the oooold Dungeons and Dragons games where you build a class that has enough HP to tank most attacks. Sure, your character suffers damage but it can "tank" the attacks. They are called tanks because a tank, the vehicle, can take a pounding before experiencing a failure. Sure, the tank can take damage (to the armor or whatever), but it may still be functional. This is where I got the idea that tanking is "little to no damage."

So if someone loses teeth and is bleeding all over is that tanking

Originally posted by chasedown
So if someone loses teeth and is bleeding all over is that tanking

I wouldn't say that is tanking, no. Losing teeth constitutes permanent damage. That's not "light damage."