Originally posted by RobtardTaking a minor wound doesn't really apply to a one on one fight. I'm sure you believe so but then again you're Rob of the tards.
You might want to watch RoF again and open your eyes this time, cos what Van Zan did to Quinn (next to nothing) is nothing compared to the beat-downs Forest did.Forest also has superior damage soak, as he took a bullet in Nam yet keep going. ie you lost another thread.
Zan wins again. M
The rescue Gump made for Bubba and Dan was more heroic and badass than anything Van Zan did. Gump saved his team mates whereas Zan got his allies killed on multiple occasions. Also Gump jogged practically non-stop across the country, so he's definitely in top shape, definitely more than a guy who with a prolonged beatdown couldn't even slightly weaken a starving man. Combined with his definitely-more rigorous war experience, Gump definitely has the means and capacity to rip Van Zan a new ******* in his face.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Taking a minor wound doesn't really apply to a one on one fight. I'm sure you believe so but then again you're Rob of the tards.Zan wins again. M
😂
"Damage-soak doesn't matter in a fight now!" - Quimchi the Coward
Down-play all you like, Gump was shot and keep on moving. What are Van Zan's durability feats? List them, instead of dodging and down-playing like a coward, coward.
While you're at it, also list Van Zan's stamina feats, as we see him sucking air after throwing a few punches like an amateur.
Originally posted by RobtardDamage soak is one factor. It's like saying McClane beats the Mountain since he can take a beatdown with fists. Its stupid.
😂"Damage-soak doesn't matter in a fight now!" - Quimchi the Coward
Down-play all you like, Gump was shot and keep on moving. What are Van Zan's durability feats? List them, instead of dodging and down-playing like a coward, coward.
While you're at it, also list Van Zan's stamina feats, as we see him sucking air after throwing a few punches like an amateur.
That doesn't apply to a fist fight. He took on no one impressive and tended to run from school bullies. If this was a running away contest that would be something else entirely. Zan runs at his problems whereas Forest runs away from them.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Damage soak is one factor. It's like saying McClane beats the Mountain since he can take a beatdown with fists. Its stupid.That doesn't apply to a fist fight. He took on no one impressive and tended to run from school bullies. If this was a running away contest that would be something else entirely. Zan runs at his problems whereas Forest runs away from them.
IOW, you can't show superior damage-soak for Van Zan nor stamina feats so you do the Three D's, dance, dodge and downplay. You lost another thread; you know it. Move along now.
Originally posted by RobtardHe doesn't need superior damage soak as he beats Forest down. Running away while taking a bullet doesn't apply to a versus fight.
IOW, you can't show superior damage-soak for Van Zan nor stamina feats so you do the Three D's, dance, dodge and downplay. You lost another thread; you know it. Move along now.
It's like saying I got shot and was running therefore I destroy an UFC fighter. Its so dumb only you would support it.
Originally posted by quanchi112
He doesn't need superior damage soak as he beats Forest down. Running away while taking a bullet doesn't apply to a versus fight.It's like saying I got shot and was running therefore I destroy an UFC fighter. Its so dumb only you would support it.
Nothing you've said has countered the pro-points (speed, damage-soak, stamina etc) towards Gump winning as you've not brought forth a single valid point to support Van Zan winning.. Your argument is: "Van Zan wins because I like him." Get a valid arument; until then, you lose.
Originally posted by RobtardBased off what does Forest have an edge in speed, stamina, and damage soak ?
Nothing you've said has countered the pro-points (speed, damage-soak, stamina etc) towards Gump winning as you've not brought forth a single valid point to support Van Zan winning.. Your argument is: "Van Zan wins because I like him." Get a valid arument; until then, you lose.
You can't be this stupid. Make a point.
Originally posted by RobtardYou are acting like running speed is the same as fighting speed ? Completely ridiculous.
You're back to ignoring all the feats/points already listed for Gump on the thread. What a clever troll tactic.
When does Forest show excellent stamina in a fight ?
When has he shown excellent damage soak in a fight ?
You haven't made one legitimate point and what's worse is you actually think you're debating.
Originally posted by RobtardZan mauled a guy in a fight. Gump Cheapshotted some bf of jenny in a car without him suspecting it. He later beat down some weasely guy.
Downplaying tactics for Gump, you've already done that.You've yet to list a single feat of Van Zan that puts him above Gump here. You've only dodged listing Van Zan's abilities when asked. Seems you're scared again.
You don't have any common sense with anything you ramble on about.
When did Gump tank a punch like it was nothing ?
Originally posted by quanchi112
Zan mauled a guy in a fight. Gump Cheapshotted some bf of jenny in a car without him suspecting it. He later beat down some weasely guy.You don't have any common sense with anything you ramble on about.
When did Gump tank a punch like it was nothing ?
Quinn had some minor bruising and a cut lip. He was also ready to continue fighting.
Gump had more fights and both his opponents didn't want anything else to do with him. They actually feared Gump's fist.
You're coming off as angry and bitter again. All that losing, I guess.
Already showed superior. Repeat: Gump tanked a bullet. Shows he has superior damage-soak and pain mitigation. You'll dodge around or imply that damage-soak and pain mitigation do not matter in a fist fight.
Originally posted by RobtardHe was still getting his ass kicked. They had to pull him off to save him. He was unable to defend himself and was getting his ass kicked.
Quinn had some minor bruising and a cut lip. He was also ready to continue fighting.Gump had more fights and both his opponents didn't want anything else to do with him. They actually feared Gump's fist.
You're coming off as angry and bitter again. All that losing, I guess.
Already showed superior. Repeat: Gump tanked a bullet. Shows he has superior damage-soak and pain mitigation. You'll dodge around or imply that damage-soak and pain mitigation do not matter in a fist fight.
Gump fought one guy by cheapshotted him while he sat in a car making out. The one run he just came at who had no fighting skill and who happened to be a coward.
No, you're coming off as unintelligent and upset. Let it go.
Tanking a bullet means he can be struck by a bullet. That has no correlation to him tanking punches. You trying to create a false comparison and hype two silly fights the special guy had is more of you coming off as butthurt. The best part is your continued bump of the butthurt thread is further evidence I'm still inside your head.
Originally posted by quanchi112
He was still getting his ass kicked. They had to pull him off to save him. He was unable to defend himself and was getting his ass kicked.Gump fought one guy by cheapshotted him while he sat in a car making out. The one run he just came at who had no fighting skill and who happened to be a coward.
No, you're coming off as unintelligent and upset. Let it go.
Tanking a bullet means he can be struck by a bullet. That has no correlation to him tanking punches. You trying to create a false comparison and hype two silly fights the special guy had is more of you coming off as butthurt. The best part is your continued bump of the butthurt thread is further evidence I'm still inside your head.
No, what I said is correct.
Downplaying Gump some more.
A "no you!" retort cos you're unoriginal.
More downplaying because you need to dodge and dance around posting Van Zan's feats, cos he lacks them. Why don't you just do your next move and arbitrarily declare "Van Zan wins."
Originally posted by RobtardNo, and saying so,etching is correct without supporting it with reasoning isn't debating.
No, what I said is correct.Downplaying Gump some more.
A "no you!" retort cos you're unoriginal.
More downplaying because you need to dodge and dance around posting Van Zan's feats, cos he lacks them. Why don't you just do your next move and arbitrarily declare "Van Zan wins."
No, I explained the circumstances and the skills of the people he fought. You just ignore, ignore, ignore.
Zan crushed a man in a fight whereas Gump beat one coward he just came in and started fighting.
Do you feel Gump beat anyone with exceptional fighting skill in his films ?
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, and saying so,etching is correct without supporting it with reasoning isn't debating.No, I explained the circumstances and the skills of the people he fought. You just ignore, ignore, ignore.
Zan crushed a man in a fight whereas Gump beat one coward he just came in and started fighting.
Do you feel Gump beat anyone with exceptional fighting skill in his films ?
Accusing me of what you're doing. So clever.
Wanking Van Zan won't change the fact that he barely damaged Quinn. You've done this Zan-wanking before.
Do you feel Van Zan beat anyone with exceptional fighting skill in his film? Seems you're having a rough day, so maybe you should just proceed to the part where you arbitrarily declare "Van Zan wins".