Originally posted by carthage Neither of them have feats that even put them even remotely close to Kun or Krayt..at all.. or even remotely. Being a dark councilor means nothing. Both of them were the strongest of their era, and on their own would prove difficult for Vitshit to defeat. Combine them and they could easily destroy nearly all of the members. There isn't that big of a power difference between them to assume otherwise
You insult these images by using them.
I understand the importance of feats to determine the capabilities of a character but this isn't the only way to determine the prowess of a character.
Becoming a member of the Dark Council is not a matter of joke, it isn't 'nothing' as you put:
To serve on the Dark Council is to achieve the greatest position of honor, power, and influence in the Empire. Many Sith spend their lives plotting their ascension to the council, but with millions vying for only 12 seats, the competition is cutthroat. The powerful few who join the council often serve for only a few months, their lives cut short by internal power struggles or external enemies who target them for assassination. (Taken from Star Wars: The Old Republic: Encyclopedia)
Also, members of the Dark Council were typically among the strongest Sith in the galaxy in any era they have existed.
The argument that Kun and Krayt were strongest in their eras is flawed;
1. Kun could not be strongest in his era since he co-existed with thousands of other Sith Lords including Emperor Vitiate, Dread Masters and Dark Council members.
2. As far as Krayt is concerned, he eventually became the strongest Sith in an era but he didn't co-exist with some of the greatest of Sith/practitioners of the dark side in history at this point. His ranking is irrelevant.
And don't make unfounded/absurd assumptions that Kun and Krayt would be able to eliminate entire Dark Council in combat situation.