Atheism, Religion and Arrogance.

Started by The Renegade4 pages

Originally posted by Oneness
The aim is to manipulate people to gain off of them.

Parasitic systems are the most enduring in today's world. Most wealthy people are trained to be insincere, untrusting, deceptive, manipulative, infectious, ambitious, and neurotic. This is Satan's fire, one must beat them at their own game. The only way to annihilate fire is with a stronger blaze in this case.

Seriously, you sound like a fucking B-movie villain. Cut that out.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
K.

Considering [b]all knowledge is subject to humanity, this question can't be answered outside of that Poverty

See above.

The above affirms my point that as humans we can never know if the nature that we're testing through science is fabricated.

You either believe that what you see is what you get, or you believe in some Descartian evil genius demon bullshit.
The philosophies of religion are formed by transformative events in history and by the communication and discussion of the significance of said events, as well as the personal life experiences of billions. Religion is collaborative and based on interactions with nature. It is purely subjective, and it is perhaps best to be remain nuetral between religion and atheism when speaking objectively.


An illusion would mean that things do not really change. But they measurably do.

Things measurably change according to our only instrument, the 5 senses, when we dream. Its a fabrication of nature, which in and of itself may just be a trick reality plays on itself.

Even without being an absolute knowledge or a God's-eye view of reality, we can at least determine causation and change.
Which may in fact equate to nothing but a blindfold keeping us from realizing there's no individuality or past or nature, that it's all an alteration of perception.

You really need to read the third paragraph of the third post on the previous page.

Originally posted by Oneness
The ideology of an end-all, be-all understanding of anything (no matter how utterly specialized the area of research [what theoretical physics is all about] is) ---- is truly "thought-terminating". In the end it is a theory that could be replaced. So then, no end-all or be-all.

My whole issue with scientific atheism is, are we eliminating what isn't real (witchcraft), or are we just coming to momentary establishments of what may or may not be real? The issue is, in either case, you're taking a leap of faith in trusting the "human POV" because we have a way of testing, observing, and documenting the recurrent effects of our interactions with, or the interactions inherent in, nature.

Because what if nature is "an illusion"? What if time is truly non-linear and there is only the eternal now and our perspectives are merely being altered? What if individuality is also a trick? What if it's all just a rouse out of the banality of the omniscient nature of nature?

This is indeed psychobabble, but not gibberish. The difference between psychobabble and incoherent thought is simple: "crazy-talk" is going too far or trying to be on all ends of the spectrum simultaneously, incoherence comes from the inability to be anywhere or articulate or comprehend any idea. It is closer to incoherence to be rational than crazy in one way, and that is that the mad-man doesn't believe that he can't make anything coherent, he believes he can make sense of anything.

As I do.

Originally posted by The Renegade
Seriously, you sound like a fucking B-movie villain. Cut that out.
this is who I am and the way I write.

Originally posted by Oneness
this is who I am and the way I write.

I don't think it is. You'll move past it down the road, unless you get trapped in it, which is as equally possible.

I mean, if not more likely.

Originally posted by The Renegade
I don't think it is. You'll move past it down the road, unless you get trapped in it, which is as equally possible.

I mean, if not more likely.

I just hope he doesn't have a gun.

Originally posted by Oneness
I'm using the big wordscorrectly
I lol'd.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
I lol'd.
I had to type most of last page and all of this page really fast on a Samsung phone. Auto-'corrected'.

Guys, Robert Greene tells me that correction is a means to herd the people I meet like sheep, and stuff. Time is like the sun's rotating axis, except it's all relative to evolution and how space is bigger than life or the "life" "concept" and how it "exists." It all ties into the complex and radiating philosophy of history and how God is a figment of humanity and not the individual.

[[/** TRANSLATION.MODULE.ACCEPTED.
--]]#||** TRANSLATION.COMPLETE

lol i dont know what the fuck im on about

You're high as ballz, Sorgo. Pass that shit.

I've stepped into the avatar of Oneness, Lucien. I'm so high, I've pierced into a separate astral plane.

Not negating the effects of time history philosophy, of course. No need to do that, and stuff.

YouTube video

That's so racist.

Relevant:

So that's what you look like.

Fat **** needs to stop meditating and start doing a carb-free ketogenic diet and sprinting his ever-growing fat folds off.

Then he needs sativa and tequila and he needs to let his ******* subconscious out so he can actually get laid without acting like a vagina about it.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
So that's what you look like.

I'm not an atheist. Let alone a fedorafag.

Originally posted by Astner
I'm not an atheist. Let alone a fedorafag.
This is why I'm glad to be hanging out too.

I can't afford to act like a fedorafag anymore, it's killing me. It will kil me one day.

That's a trilby.