Originally posted by Tattoos N Scars
Normally, I would agree with that, but Thor doesn't display high levels of skill in pure H2h. Thor has centuries more experience than Cap, but no one would argue that Cap has better h2h skills than Thor.
Ok, what skills have Batman displayed (without the use of gear) that you think Thor can't replicate?
Originally posted by FrothByteLol, dude was sloooooooooooow and Batman would easily dodge every attack thrown his way.
That big black guy is a SHIELD agent and not just a "guard". You really think Batman can easily end someone like Ward or Crossbones? Because you know, those guys are SHIELD agents too and seem a lot tougher than the average rabble that Batman faces.
Originally posted by FrothByte
You really think Batman can easily end someone like Ward or Crossbones? Because you know, those guys are SHIELD agents too and seem a lot tougher than the average rabble that Batman faces.
Ward is actually part of
Spoiler:
Hydra
still if that's what they have to offer that organization better things to come for Avengers 2.
Originally posted by RJ 2.0I don't like using this strat but...
Lol, no. Remember when Thor 1v1'd the big black guard? Batman would have ended that guy in seconds.
based on?
Originally posted by Tattoos N ScarsYeah, but Black Widow has shown way, way more skill than Batman ever did.
I think Black Widow or Hawkeye could go through same agents rather easily
Originally posted by FrothByte
So Thor beating up all those SHIELD agents while he was depowered and had no weapons don't count?
No no, it counts fine, which is why I think this match is so close, just saying Thors centuries worth of fighting experience isnt all that here, as he no longer has his powers, abilities, gear or weaponry, all of which he would be used to in his centuries worth of training. I really dont see anything depowered Thor did that Batman in full gear couldnt also do, and very possibly easier so.
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
TBH we don't know how old Thor or Loki are as it was never stated.
This post actually got me curious, so I did some checking.
The flashback in the beginning of Thor, when Odin wages war on the Frost Giants, is supposed to have happened in 965 A.D. Loki and Thor had already been born by then. So they are both over a thousand years old.
Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
This post actually got me curious, so I did some checking.The flashback in the beginning of Thor, when Odin wages war on the Frost Giants, is supposed to have happened in 965 A.D. Loki and Thor had already been born by then. So they are both over a thousand years old.
Good to know, thanks man!
Originally posted by Zack Fair
While wearing armor. I honestly believe that black guy would give him trouble in a h2h match, but thats just me.I definitely believe Batman should be more skilled. I just can't get past the stupid choreography. My problem I know.
It's actually Batman's problem, because his skill level is determined by the fight choreography.
It's actually interesting to note that the fighting styles and choreography for the Batman films was developed by the same company who did it for Jack Reacher and MI3. Defence Lab. I have actually corresponded with them in the past, when they wanted to organise some self defence and fight choreography classes/seminars in my area.
Haven't seen Jack Reacher myself, so I haven't gotten a chance to compare execution of the fight scenes in both films. I just know Batman choreography was extremely inconsistent. Some fight scenes make Bats and his opponents look fast and agile. Others they look slow and awkward.
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Good to know, thanks man!
No problem man. Your post got me curious myself.