Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
I thought that too until stared thinking about them tying In, Planet Hulk with Avengers 3. It would take a good script but you don't see the potential of tying in a planet Hulk with Avengers 3? I only say that because Hulk is that last of the THREE main Avengers that requires a stand alone movie Personally, i'd be fine with the HULK just being a side lines character but even I understand that they can't do that when considering how they've introduced the characters. There is no way Hulk is not going to get another SOLO movie. If he is it has to include forces that are un earthly and don't see how else they could make a Hulk stand alone movie without him appearing as though he doesn't need the Avengers.
I really want another stand alone Hulk flick, especially with Mark Ruffalo since his performance > Norton's. Just Planet Hulk wouldn't transfer well into live action, imo.
Originally posted by DARTH POWERI don't think they're afraid. I think they have a plan. Avengers 2 is going to be very hulk centric, and will maybe serve as a foundation or building block for a hulk solo film later on. It'll happen before Avengers 3 imo
Not sure why they've been so afraid of doing Hulk solo movies post Avengers. It should be pretty clear by now that all of the Avengers have gotten massive box office boosts with their own solo films since Avengers. Hulk would be no different.
Originally posted by DARTH POWER
Not sure why they've been so afraid of doing Hulk solo movies post Avengers. It should be pretty clear by now that all of the Avengers have gotten massive box office boosts with their own solo films since Avengers. Hulk would be no different.
Well Hulk 2008 did make the least amount of money. That and perhaps Disney is trying to ride the Loki/Iron Man gravy train for all its worth. Then again GoTG is coming out so who knows.
Originally posted by Firefly218
I don't think they're afraid. I think they have a plan. Avengers 2 is going to be very hulk centric, and will maybe serve as a foundation or building block for a hulk solo film later on. It'll happen before Avengers 3 imo
Yes but it was a plan based on Hulk not being ready for Solo movies yet. Just the fact that he was the only Avengers not to be given his own solo movie through Phase II is proof of that.
Fact is if Norton's Hulk was a big success then Hulk would have had a solo film in Phase II. So it was about the worry of it not being profitable enough. In fact they've almost outright stated that, with various Marvel execs saying Hulk as to be figured out correctly.
Originally posted by Robtard
I really want another stand alone Hulk flick, especially with Mark Ruffalo since his performance > Norton's. Just Planet Hulk wouldn't transfer well into live action, imo.
I'm with you in the sense that I jut want to see another Hulk movie. However, I think PLanet Hulk would be an excellent way to tell a Hulk story. For one, you don't have to worry about what Shield or the Avengers would do if Hulk goes on a rampage. I could also see it being a great way to Segway into Avengers 3
Originally posted by Zack Fair
???Why though? Thor showed he had what it takes to fight Hulk to a standstill.
A pissed off Hulk running rampant vs a pissed off Thor using Mjolnir's powers would be a sight to behold in the movies.
WWH is Hulk at his best. A Hulk that makes Savage Hulk look like doo doo. Thor should get curbed by this version of Hulk. Picture it as the Kurse fight but much more devastating.
Originally posted by carver9You do realize Thor was not fighting at his best as well, right? Except Hulk has no invulnerability spell against Asgardian weaponry. Thor should/will be the one to stalemate Hulk long enough. No one in the cinematic universe has what it takes. Thor is the only logical choice. Don't be such a biased fanboy, man. You know it makes sense.
WWH is Hulk at his best. A Hulk that makes Savage Hulk look like doo doo. Thor should get curbed by this version of Hulk. Picture it as the Kurse fight but much more devastating.
Originally posted by Zack Fair
You do realize Thor was not fighting at his best as well, right? Except Hulk has no invulnerability spell against Asgardian weaponry. Thor should/will be the one to stalemate Hulk long enough. No one in the cinematic universe has what it takes. Thor is the only logical choice. Don't be such a biased fanboy, man. You know it makes sense.
Kurse easily demolished Thor. If you honestly believe Kurse would do the same to Avengers Hulk, then you are crazy. And that's Avengers Hulk. WWH is a different beast.
Originally posted by juggerman
If Thor fights like a bone head(which he will) then yeah Hulk curb stomps his face off.
Uuuuummmm, even if he didn't fight like a bone head, what attack of Thor do you think would stop an amped Hulk? His tornado? What about his lightning? What fts does that have to suggest he would stop an amped Hulk? Wait a minute, you are talking about that hit that Thor used during the ending fight that shattered some glass? Do you HONESTLY think that Lick was stronger than the one Hulk used against the big worm?