Thor: Ragnarok

Originally posted by Surtur
But I'm not all over the map with what I believe it means. I merely gave you the definition.

The website is a review website. What their views are on power levels are irrelevant.

Also no, punching something repeatedly is not the same as a single charged energy attack.

No,mit isn't since the more time an energy attack is used the more damage is caused the same as any attack over a prolonged period. 🙂

Originally posted by Surtur
So in your crazy world saying the loss wasn't a true loss and was bullshit..didn't make sense?

Remember how you keep saying all people are "all over the place" ?

You've officially lost your sanity here. You basically just want to have you, by yourself, in a room talking about how great Hulk is.

Your sanity continues to degrade with each reply. This is fascinating.

You become more stupid with each reply. Proceed.

There is context to the loss but the person still called it BS and you flipped over it.

How's that insanity going? Still upset over the proper definition of words?

Originally posted by Surtur
There is context to the loss but the person still called it BS and you flipped over it.

How's that insanity going? Still upset over the proper definition of words?

You glossed over me decimating your laughable attempt to ignore what the word powerhouse means in this day and age. It is the Hulk.

There is no "glossing over" it. It was irrelevant. You didn't decimate anything. You seem to truly believe the insane things you say. Especially when you act like in the modern age the word "powerhouse" basically just has one meaning.

Do you get that you haven't demonstrated anything of the sort? Wait, why not point out again how Screen Rant totally agree's with you?

This has potential to be the best comic movie next year.

Originally posted by quanchi112
[B]They commented on the portrayal which you seem to disagree with by ignoring what people refer to as a powerhouse. Take for instance me referring to a woman as "hot" and you saying the definition refers to temperature and heat. You're an idiot.

Except your "hot" example doesn't actually make any sense. That isn't at all equivalent to you being unable to accept the definitions of words.

Something needs to once again be pointed out: this isn't your topic or your discussion. Nor are you the be all end all of what words mean.

Do you want to continue this discussion or do you want to revert to the discussion you originally brought up? We can talk about how you have insane reactions to things, or we can talk about Hulk being the physically strongest Avenger.

Originally posted by juggernaut74
This has potential to be the best comic movie next year.

Plus the fact they felt they needed to throw the Hulk into the movie gives me mixed feelings.

Almost seems like they felt they needed some kind of gimmick in order to hook people.

Originally posted by Surtur
There is no "glossing over" it. It was irrelevant. You didn't decimate anything. You seem to truly believe the insane things you say. Especially when you act like in the modern age the word "powerhouse" basically just has one meaning.

Do you get that you haven't demonstrated anything of the sort? Wait, why not point out again how Screen Rant totally agree's with you?

It's a non biased site which backs me up. Who backs you up ? No one.

🙂

Originally posted by Surtur
Except your "hot" example doesn't actually make any sense. That isn't at all equivalent to you being unable to accept the definitions of words.

Something needs to once again be pointed out: this isn't your topic or your discussion. Nor are you the be all end all of what words mean.

Do you want to continue this discussion or do you want to revert to the discussion you originally brought up? We can talk about how you have insane reactions to things, or we can talk about Hulk being the physically strongest Avenger.

You are being stupid. I've pointed it out and won't drop it. You can't handle you're wrong.

Originally posted by Surtur
Plus the fact they felt they needed to throw the Hulk into the movie gives me mixed feelings.

Almost seems like they felt they needed some kind of gimmick in order to hook people.

Well the producer(s) had Asgard, Loki, and Katt Dennings boobs but I guess they were too good to use those as a hook: less so with Loki.

Hopefully Hulk gets to shine like he did in the first Avengers...aside from the whole falling scenario.

Originally posted by Surtur
Plus the fact they felt they needed to throw the Hulk into the movie gives me mixed feelings.

Almost seems like they felt they needed some kind of gimmick in order to hook people.

I don't think so. I mean that's be like being worried they decided to put IM in Cap3.

I think the decision was more akin to "people want more Hulk, but we don't want to make solo Hulk films. So where can we use him?"

Adding Hulk to a Thor film can only net positive results; this is a fact. Someone get this jabroni outta here.

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view6/2301478/hulk-vs-thor-o.gif

Originally posted by quanchi112
In reference yo the manner in which we are addressing these characters you're damn right it is. It isn't the most successful you dolt. It's like saying hot girls are burning up and not based off now people speak in terms of attractive levels.

It's a non biased site which backs me up. Who backs you up ? No one.

🙂

It's not like saying any of that at all though. You seem fundamentally confused.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, it does. It's how people speak in certain cultures when it comes to what girls are attractive. You're a moron who responds to certain parts of my posts but not the entire thing.

You are being stupid. I've pointed it out and won't drop it. You can't handle you're wrong.

But again: confusing "hot" when it is used to mean attractive as taking it to mean temperature is taking the word to mean something completely different and being quite literal. What I pointed out was the specific word you're using has multiple definitions. You can't seem to accept this, you keep saying I'm "wrong" when this actually isn't debatable. The actual definition speaks for itself. Your perceptions of this are irrelevant.

Your need to constantly lash out and insult people is quite telling. You've more or less been quite upset ever since I corrected you on the true definition of the words you are using. You say I won't drop it and "can't handle I'm wrong" but that seems to be a projection. If anyone in this thread has displayed personality traits akin to being unable to handle when they are wrong it is you. Even if you don't agree with this...surely you realize how others could perceive this?

Originally posted by Surtur
It's not like saying any of that at all though. You seem fundamentally confused.

Originally posted by Surtur
But again: confusing "hot" when it is used to mean attractive as taking it to mean temperature is taking the word to mean something completely different and being quite literal. What I pointed out was the specific word you're using has multiple definitions. You can't seem to accept this, you keep saying I'm "wrong" when this actually isn't debatable. The actual definition speaks for itself. Your perceptions of this are irrelevant.

Your need to constantly lash out and insult people is quite telling. You've more or less been quite upset ever since I corrected you on the true definition of the words you are using. You say I won't drop it and "can't handle I'm wrong" but that seems to be a projection. If anyone in this thread has displayed personality traits akin to being unable to handle when they are wrong it is you. Even if you don't agree with this...surely you realize how others could perceive this?

I am smiling while I berate and insult you. 😂

All that really tells me is that you definitely aren't smiling while you berate anyone.

Originally posted by Surtur
All that really tells me is that you definitely aren't smiling while you berate anyone.