Originally posted by Darth Thor
Hulk clearly does need weapons to match a Mjolnirless Thor.That's what we're being shown in Ragnarok.
You think those swords he's wielding are a match for Mjolnir?
It's not excuses it's called context. Hulk's never faced the wrath of Thor's full power set. Thor on the other hand is about to face a Hulk armed to the teeth.
Hulk already fought a hammer wielding Thor without any weapons and he came across as better. Facts.
So somehow them being both armed is unfair for poor little Thor. Oh the bias and the excuses. Hulk wasn't armed against Thor in avengers one so quit being a hypocrite. I think both sets of weapons are comparable in this scene. I don't think Hulk's weapons are comparable to Mjolnir either but he already took him on weaponless and didn't lose. It seems Thor is allowed armor and a weak but if you give the same to Hulk you're losing your shit. Hulk being the powerhouse can fight shirtless and without a weapon while you admit Thor can't do so without you crying about. That's because Hulk is the powerhouse Thor is the skilled warrior. I'm right.
By your own logic neither did Kurse and he decimated Thor. Just because you don't like his tactics that doesn't mean you get to ignore the outcome because your insane bias and excuse making for the character. That's what losers do cry about what should have happened or what would have happened not what did happen.