Originally posted by StoicContext. Win/loss doesn't mean everything anyways. It is like saying I am undefeated beating kids in a fight versus a UFC fighter who is 10-12 and saying he wins based off that.
Drax is up next. What's the odds of Kallark being beaten again? Pretty high I'd say when you look at his track record. I wonder if he has more losses than wins? I'm betting that he has more losses. Even Gambit defeated him with a deck of charged up cards no less. If this is me low balling Kallark it's a bit hard not to when he loses so much.I wonder how well he'd do against that team of Avengers that were all over Adam? I'm betting that he'd get his face pushed in even if you took the Sentry out of the equation. look at how a dying Hulk beat the scotch out of him. You talk about low durability? What do you imagine Adam would be hitting him with? If Gambit could put him out with a deck of charged up cards. Adam would likely one shot him, with a charged up anti matter punch to the grill.
Sentry would ko him just like he ko'd marvel's first appearance in his own book. Hulk beats Marvel as well. He also used weakness exploitation after gladiator almost killed him. Context. Quit centering your entire argument off of one showing.
Gladiator wins.