Dc buckles under pressure and moves Sup/Bat release date

Originally posted by quanchi112

Mos wasn't the success they originally predicted. Not all good movies are huge successes.

Show me where it's stated what they originally predicted. Otherwise I'll assume that's another one of Quanchi's typical lies and BS. All the evidence is against you. Mos lead to the announcement of B v S. That means the studio was more than happy with it. MOS tripled it's budget and made its marketing costs back through sponsorships. After Superman Returns bombed MOS' s kind of financial success is only going to mean a very happy studio. Heck even without a previous bomb that would make any studio high on success and happiness. Mos' s high DVD/BLU-RAY Sales shows movie fans have given their thumbs up to it.

So yeah MOS was a Massive success. Show me this Insane and BS prediction figures after SR Bombed so we can all see the Quanchi jealousy and lies in action.

MOS was a frigging Awesome movie. Between MOS, B v S and JL this is going to be one bad ass DC trilogy Zack Synder's giving us but your going to hate every second of it. The jealousy will just burn you up.

MoS was a successful, but terrible movie.

Originally posted by Bardock42
MoS was a successful, but terrible movie.

IYO which film producers don't really care about. They care about the majority who showed the love for the movie at the box office first and later backed it with by buying the DVD/Blu-Ray's.

Why do you keep insisting on telling me that something is my opinion. I mean this is clear, I didn't have to do this:

Originally posted by DARTH POWER

MOS was a frigging Awesome movie.

IYO

Everyone knows that opinions on movies are the person's alone...

Originally posted by Bardock42
Why do you keep insisting on telling me that something is my opinion. I mean this is clear, I didn't have to do this:

Because you keep insisting on repeating your opinion over and over. Your clearly a DC hater.

That's not even true tho....

Originally posted by Bardock42
I hope this movie is good, but cause Man of Steel was so bad I don't have much hope.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Green Lantern was so ridiculously bad. Probably even worse than Man of Steel and The Amazing Spider-Man 2

Originally posted by Bardock42
If it was awesome, then why was it so shit?

Can't explain that.

Originally posted by Bardock42
MoS was a successful, but terrible movie.

That's 4 times you've said it now in the last 3 pages. Even reacting to Lestov saying it was Awesome. So don't give me that "I'm not a hater," and "Everyone's entitiled to their opinion" crap. Because clearly you are a hater, and clearly you weren't letting Lestov just sit with his opinion of MOS being awesome. And clearly you felt you needed to step in every time it was mentioned that the movie was a success and most people liked/loved it.

So yeah no hate from you... Sure buddy 👆

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
That's 4 times you've said it now in the last 3 pages. Even reacting to Lestov saying it was Awesome. So don't give me that "I'm not a hater," and "Everyone's entitiled to their opinion" crap. Because clearly you are a hater, and clearly you weren't letting Lestov just sit with his opinion of MOS being awesome. And clearly you felt you needed to step in every time it was mentioned that the movie was a success and most people liked/loved it.

So yeah no hate from you... Sure buddy 👆

I didn't deny hating Man of Steel (and the Green Lantern movie, and Amazing Spider-Man 2), I've been vocal about that. You accused me of hating DC, which is just not the case.

I'll definitely say that between the Marvel and DC films released in 2013, DC definitely had the better film. I'll take MOS over IM3 and T:TDW any day.

Originally posted by Lestov16
I'll definitely say that between the Marvel and DC films released in 2013, DC definitely had the better film. I'll take MOS over IM3 and T:TDW any day.

Oh yeah without a doubt.

While both Thor 2 and Iron Man 3 weren't great, I preferred them over Man of Steel.

I loved Thor 2 and really enjoyed Iron Man 3. They may not have been deep or profound movies, but they were fun.

MoS was bland; it tried to be profound. All the blame goes to the writers and director, as I happen to think Henry Cavill as supes, Michael Shannon as Zod and Amy Adams as Lois were perfectly cast.

I blame Shane Black for the completely stupid mess that was Iron Man 3. They tried to be fun, but it just ended up being stupid as hell. It wasn't even funny which seemed to be it's aim.

I love action comedies like Bad Boys and Rush Hour, but even they take their own plot seriously. IM3 didn't.

Thor 2 was ok. Just nothing epic. And a big step down from the Original. Best scenes were between Thor and Loki.

Neither of those films even touched MOS though. That was just proper action packed fun.

IMO

Thor2>MOS>Ironman3

only bad parts about thor 2 were the darcy and friends adventures. Cut those out and everything else was good.

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
Neither of those films even touched MOS though. That was just proper action packed fun.

I disagree. As does the general audience. Thor 2 and MoS, according to popular consensus, were even. MoS got a 55/100 metacritic with 6.5/10 from GA. Thor 2 got a 54/100 metacritic with 7.5/10 from GA.

Iron Man 3 got a 62/100 metacritic with 6.4/10 from GA.

Claiming Thor and IM can't touch MoS is major hyperbole

Also financially, both Thor 2 and and Iron Man 3 in particular, were better than MoS. Which, if I understand Darth Power correctly, means that they were better than MoS overall, luckily that is also in line with my opinion....

While I don't endorse this article, and think it could have been done better, I thought perhaps you guys would like reading it as well, since it is somewhat tangential to some of the conversation in here:

http://www.theverge.com/2014/8/22/6056617/marvels-movie-business-is-crushing-dcs-and-its-not-close

Originally posted by Firefly218
I disagree. As does the general audience. Thor 2 and MoS, according to popular consensus, were even. MoS got a 55/100 metacritic with 6.5/10 from GA. Thor 2 got a 54/100 metacritic with 7.5/10 from GA.

Iron Man 3 got a 62/100 metacritic with 6.4/10 from GA.
Claiming Thor and IM can't touch MoS is major hyperbole

Metacritic is clearly not the objective standard of film quality, as they gave Prometheus a higher score than any of the above-mentioned films, and that's obviously not true.Also, box office is non-indicative of a film's quality, exampled by bad films such as Bayformers having massive success and good films like Edge Of Tomorrow being near-bombs.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Metacritic is clearly not the objective standard of film quality, as they gave Prometheus a higher score than any of the above-mentioned films, and that's obviously not true.Also, box office is non-indicative of a film's quality, exampled by bad films such as Bayformers having massive success and good films like Edge Of Tomorrow being near-bombs.

lol

Originally posted by Firefly218
I disagree. As does the general audience. Thor 2 and MoS, according to popular consensus, were even. MoS got a 55/100 metacritic with 6.5/10 from GA. Thor 2 got a 54/100 metacritic with 7.5/10 from GA.

Iron Man 3 got a 62/100 metacritic with 6.4/10 from GA.

Claiming Thor and IM can't touch MoS is major hyperbole

Wow talk about bull..

You want actual movie fan ratings, go to Imdb- Thor 2: 7.2, MOS 7.3, and IM3 7.4.

They're all actually about the same there. But still it's based on a selection of movie fans voting. It's not like your general audience all goes votes on there after watching the movie. And it's at a time when Marvel Love is at an all time high. Still MOS matches them there.

But you want ACTUAL FACTS for the subject? Look at the DVD and Blu-Ray Sales. People go to the cinema to watch movies they end up hating, but people generally only BUY movies they liked/loved.

And MOS won that hands down despite IM3 having like Double the Box Office Success of MOS. And that really says everything we need to know about that subject. Hands down factual.

And that is especially damn impressive at a time where everyone Loves Marvel above all else due to a few of their truly Epic films- (Iron Man 1 and Avengers being the truly epic ones which just about everyone loved). And with Marvel Hype at an all time high especially after Avengers more people chose to BUY MOS. That is impressive.

Oh and I like who you DC Haters and Marvel Fanboys are always like "What I think MOS was shiite it's MY OPINION, WHAT'S YOUR PROBLEM," and then the minute someone says your movies sucked your like

"NO THE GENERAL AUDIENCE DISAGREES BECAUSE METACRITIC SAYS SO LULZ" and "THATS MAJOR HYPERBOLE, SHUT UP AHHHGGG"

Go take your Hate Bullcrap METACRITIC Propoganda and spread it on some Marvel fanboy site. Or at least a Marvel fanboy Thread.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Also financially, both Thor 2 and and Iron Man 3 in particular, were better than MoS. Which, if I understand Darth Power correctly, means that they were better than MoS overall, luckily that is also in line with my opinion....

MOS grossed more money than Thor 2 you DC Hater Marvel Fanboy.

And when did I say BOX OFFICE IS ALL THAT MATTERS.

Well it does when it comes to a sequel, but MOS was not only financially successful despite having to fight the stink that was Superman Returns, but it was generally liked by Audiences as seen by Movie fan and general audience ratings and most of all seen by DVD and Blu-Ray Sales.

And MOS didn't have the GIGANTIC Box Office Boost from Avengers like Thor 2 and IM3 did.

Oh and MOS made considerably more than IM1 and Thor 1.