Originally posted by Stoic
We should take it into consideration, because at times it takes many years to fully flesh out a character. Look at the Sentry for example; the writers don't seem to know how to make heads or tails of this guy. If you're upset at the placing of the gauntlet take it up with the OP. Savage Hulk does not have the same power set as Blue Marvel, nor was it ever stated that PC Superman was weak to gamma radiation unless I somehow missed it. PC Superman on the other hand was stated to be vulnerable to anti matter energy, which is what I am saying. So what I am saying is that I don't see any reason why he would not be lit up by by Adam's antimatter powers, if directed into a punch.You comparing King Hyperion to PC Superman is also an error, because they aren't the same character, or is King Hyperion weakened by Kryptonite as well? The same can be said that he may not be vulnerable to antimatter.
Now here's the kicker, what if you are incorrect in the future? It would be relevant to this, because they simply did not have enough time to showcase the full limits of his powers, and this is something that takes time. Since when was an energy blast/hit capable of destroying a universe needed to light up PC Superman? I never said anything about that, just that Adam should be able to light him up. Never said anything about killing him, or melting universes.
And Sentry started off fighting whole groups of heroes. Blue Marvel did... ?
Sentry from the very start was supposed to be the most powerful hero. Blue Marvel from the very start was supposed to be a Thor level being. Difference.
What? I'm not talking about the gauntlet. I'm saying that Blue Marvel doesn't hit harder than Hulk and thus shouldn't effect him. I don't care about the placement.
What?
The issue with that is EVERY being outside a select few was vulnerable to anti matter. It wasn't because it was a weakness, it was because it obliterates matter. Which King Hyperion was. Only durability and select abilities protected people. There's actually an event about it funnily enough.
But if BM's AM was the same as AM's AM then Hyperion wouldn't have a head. Unless Hyperion is more durable than the entirety of DC.
I fully realize I can be wrong in the future. Never denied it. Which is why I'm actually relying on existing evidence to form my conclusion. You know, if BM stays at the same level of power and doesn't get an outrageous bump in power from what he's shown?
With that said, acting like he can only get more powerful is worse to believe than if he stays the same. You can't play future cards against me when it's easily as applicable to you.
I never said universal blasts were needed to harm Superman. I said that BM should be able to kill almost any DC opponent due to his power. And AM wasn't devastating because of its size. A universal sized AM wave is going to be just as devastating to Superman as a bear sized blast of AM. Which is my point. AM no matter the size is /was lethal. Whether AM drops a house sized blast or a universal sized blast on a Wonder Woman it's still going to have the same potency. Which SHOULD be true of BM too. If he's firing off human sized waves following COIE he should be disintegrating human sized holes in pretty much anything. But he's not. Is he now?
Assuming the potency of BM's power based off COIE and say Galactus isn't going to work when all his shit has shown is that it's basically an energy attack. He ain't done shit to make me believe he seriously effects Superman with it. Ain't shit.
But if you'd like you can show me otherwise with BM scans. 🙂