Originally posted by FreshestSlice
No.....Well yes. That and the fact that everyone else said Revan was more powerful than Malak as well. Seriously. It's not that hard to put two and two together. Malak was a more skilled duelist, but he couldn't compete with Revan Force-wise.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
What are your views on rating Revan's relative incarnations?You place Darth Revan above KOTOR Revan, yet I thought you had KOTOR Revan equal to Novel Revan. Did I miss something?
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
As someone who places Darth Revan above KotOR!Revan, I find it unlikely Malak ever surpassed his former master until he was amplified by the Star Forge, if even then.
Originally posted by Kotor3
How so?I wouldn't say that Anakin was more knowledgeable in the force than Dooku or more powerful at the time of ROTS. I would state that he had the potential to surpass Dooku at anytime due to his potential in the force .
When you beat someone 3 or more times in row, despite not being at your full ability.... that's a big indication that you're superior. Anakin only beat Dooku once and at the time hell yeah he was superior. He cut his hands off by choosing to, obviously he was better.
I don't understand how you can think Malak was better than Revan when he lost again and again and again. That's kind of stupid, no offense.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Nor did Kyle, if you read the book (you didn't.) He just did it without any knowledge on the attack or anything.
Ah, ok. So you don't actually have to provide any evidence for this theory for it to be totally possible. Seems legit. 👆
Ok, so I guess I have to significantly lower my estimation of Kotor Revan. Le sign.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Then how did he win?
Over and over and over again?
Malak never gave any indication on the SF that he felt that Revan had surpassed him while amplified even though he acknowledge that Revan had a stronger connection to the force.
Originally posted by Nephthys
When you beat someone 3 or more times in row, despite not being at your full ability.... that's a big indication that you're superior. Anakin only beat Dooku once and at the time hell yeah he was superior. He cut his hands off by choosing to, obviously he was better.I don't understand how you can think Malak was better than Revan when he lost again and again and again. That's kind of stupid, no offense.
"The Star Forge was a Force-imbued, self-sustaining shipyard. Rakatan. It was destroyed centuries ago, but the Revanites have recovered some of the wreckage. Its technology makes the soldiers nearly immortal. Seizes their minds as well, placing them under the Revanites' full control."
--Lana Beniko (Star Wars: The Old Republic)
Originally posted by Nephthys
Ah, ok. So you don't actually have to provide any evidence for this theory for it to be totally possible. Seems legit. 👆Ok, so I guess I have to significantly lower my estimation of Kotor Revan. Le sign.
Lol wut? Beating Malak in his amped state is insane.
Originally posted by Kotor3
I do not see how Malak wouldn't be able to compete force-wise with a Revan whose memories were not fully restored also while being amp by the SF.
Originally posted by Kotor3
You ask these questions as if only inferior force users lose battles. Cleary that is not the case in the Star Wars Universe. How did he win? Through superior skill and most of all because that is the way they wrote the story.Malak never gave any indication on the SF that he felt that Revan had surpassed him while amplified even though he acknowledge that Revan had a stronger connection to the force.
But your own argument is that Revan was only half-trained and lacked knowledge. Since he'd only had a few months of Jedi experience at that point, whereas Malak had decades. So how was he more skilled?
Malak doesn't need to indicate anything. The game gives us all the indication we need when he loses. And then loses again. And then loses again. And possibly more.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
In all reality, with the boost Darth Malak should be receiving, he should be like a ****ing god, an easily the most powerful being in the galaxy:[b]"The Star Forge was a Force-imbued, self-sustaining shipyard. Rakatan. It was destroyed centuries ago, but the Revanites have recovered some of the wreckage. Its technology makes the soldiers nearly immortal. Seizes their minds as well, placing them under the Revanites' full control."
--Lana Beniko (Star Wars: The Old Republic) [/B]
Well firstly Vitiate, Soa, World Razer, Dread Masters, (possibly) Nihilus, Sel-Makor and the Anchorites >>>>>> Malak no matter what amp he gets.
And secondly that quote does actually imply much of anything. Theres a difference between immortal and invincible.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
The evidence is in the Prima Guide.Lol wut? Beating Malak in his amped state is [b]insane
. [/B]
Isn't that just game mechanics?
Nah. Dooku could beat him comfortably.
Originally posted by Nephthys
When you beat someone 3 or more times in row, despite not being at your full ability.... that's a big indication that you're superior. Anakin only beat Dooku once and at the time hell yeah he was superior. He cut his hands off by choosing to, obviously he was better.I don't understand how you can think Malak was better than Revan when he lost again and again and again. That's kind of stupid, no offense.
However that doesn’t mean that Malak was inferior in power while amp by the SF which is the topic of discussion here. Not skill, strategy, ability, but power. Power is just one factor in battle. It is obvious that Malak superiority in power was not vastly over Revan while amplified on the SF. But still superior.
Originally posted by NephthysWell firstly Vitiate, Soa, World Razer, Dread Masters, (possibly) Nihilus, Sel-Makor and the Anchorites >>>>>> Malak no matter what amp he gets.
And secondly that quote does actually imply much of anything. Theres a difference between immortal and invincible.
You don't find 'immortal' impressive? Though, I'm not going to really debate it with you until the new update is actually released.
Originally posted by Nephthys
But your own argument is that Revan was only half-trained and lacked knowledge. Since he'd only had a few months of Jedi experience at that point, whereas Malak had decades. So how was he more skilled?
Malak doesn't need to indicate anything. The game gives us all the indication we need when he loses. And then loses again. And then loses again. And possibly more.
However he did regain some of his memories before fighting Malak. So he obviously would have regain some of if not all of his knowledge of the force which would have increase his skill and potential greatly.