Originally posted by Robtard
Broshielding is protecting a fellow [male] poster after they'll done/said something damning.
Oh something like this?
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Bro%20Shield
😆
Originally posted by Time ImmemorialAs good as any I guess.
Oh something like this?http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Bro%20Shield
😆
Originally posted by Slay
Can't believe I'm saying this, but it's ridiculous that PVS is getting shit for calling out Sorgo. Of course DDM would say anything to be discordant but man, you're almost starting to sound like AC, the pedophile's advocate.Those battle rap guys are right, this place is filled with sick ****s.
it must seem odd to them, this small group of e-bros posting diversionary shit everywhere in an attempt to derail and make the whole topic just go away.
nothing suspicious at all going on here. 🙄
DDM where are you my bro, you are my bro shield🙂
The "Bro Shield" is a defensive mechanism possessed only by bros. It is mainly used to ward off negative and or bull shit comments made by non-bros, often referred to as haters because of either their negative or jealous attitudes toward the bro. It is not, however, limited to those types of comments. The power of the Bro Shield can be called upon whenever and wherever a bro sees fit to use it.
Well, just thought I'd let you know about the post-source thing.
And now here's a song from Tim Minchin:
Don't have sound atm, so I hope it's not edited, cos that would be lame.
Of course this could also be why DDM is being so weird about the ''pedophile'' issue:
Originally posted by dadudemon
I had a thought experiment based on this. It happened when this gal, who was 14, but did not look a day younger than 25-27, was making advances towards me (this was 2-3 years ago). If I was single and did not know any better, I may have made some shitty choices because she was smoking hot. I did not find out, until later from her older brother, that she was 14. She clearly knew what she was doing and that made her seem creepy, imo...Here are two scenarios (switch the genders to make it fit your preferred gender in romantic or sexual relationships):
1. Is it wrong to be attracted to a female if she looks fully sexually mature (disregard the mental aspect of this question)?
2. Is it wrong to be attracted to a female that looks like she is 12 but has the intelligence and maturity of a 40 year old (assume she is well past legal age of consent)?
I see the answers to both of those questions as "yes and/or no."
I think the reasons are obvious to most of us, too.
Do those situations apply to the Prophet's case? No, I do not think so. He may have had a problem, imo...
Damn those 14 year olds looking like they're 25-27! Right? RIGHT!?
Edit: Also note his use of the words ''thought experiment''.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
thats actually not true. so much for your quest for perfection.age: 39
fact count: 0
From my perspective, you've been 38 for years. That reminds me of menopausal women starting to feel mortal and amazingly always turning 29, every single year. Not calling you a liar, but it seems like you should have been well into your 40s by this point. No, I am not confusing you for Robtard. But if you are really 39 (I have no idea how TE knew that), my bad.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
that is just your opinion. it could be that you only have this opinion because you are joining the obvious diversionary/apologist bro-shield. then again you have not compulsively followed me around derailing threads like TE/supra, so i won't pretend to know the fact of your motive.fact count: 0
Actually, what I said was probably a fact. I think you're elevating TE's interests in this topic way too far. Think of him far less like what you and Backfire do and more like a guy going "wow, so many derps, derps everywhere." He really does not give two f*cks about that greater feud.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
then i guess AC is exonerated since he propositioned sarah when she was 19. that would make him neither pedo nor hebo...when your silly attempt at reasoning is applied.
19 is within that age range, broski. 🙂 It's 15-19. That's ephebophilia. And his actions to pursue his ephebophilia were criminal so it's a pathology. I thought I made that clear, already? What are we disagreeing on, here? Wait, no, I see: you're narrowing the scope of his actions down to just 1 person at age 19. That doesn't address all the cases and I clearly was not talking about cases that involved adults since I used buzzwords like "CP" and "Minor." Additionally, I wasn't even aware Sarah was 19 when he did his creepy shit with her: I thought she was underage. Yes, I am aware that some of his victims were adults but I think I was clear that I was focusing my points on his issue: ephebophilia.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
pedophile and hebephile are not mutually exclusive, either. one can easily be both.fact count: 0
Wait...what are you arguing against, at this point? I don't think I ever said they were mutually exclusive nor did I say they were mutually inclusive. Are you just making a general statement or are you genuinely arguing against something I did not say while thinking you're arguing against something I said? It's okay if you thought I said that but I didn't and we can move on. But, I don't think you think I said that and you do not think I implied that so you're making another point. For now, it just seems like it is an aside comment. Is that the point you were trying to make? If not, please clarify.
Fact count for dadudemon: 2.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it took him 2 posts to satisfy you. again your opinion does not denote fact. so....fact count: 0
That's not one of the 3 items on the list. You included a fact count where you should not have, sir.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
iblackmail is illegal as is using nude photos for blackmail. i know you seem to consider that a superfical detail but there it is.fact count- still 0
My comment was not about the "blackmail", which I have no evidence of. I see witnesses testifying to brow-beating and possibly harassment.. My comments did not address that because I do not have enough facts to discuss the blackmail aspect of this scenario, nor was I part of those, and I do not feel comfortable talking about that aspect of the situation. The victims have a right to feel harassed and blackmailed, basically, is what I'm getting at. That argument is more subjective than the one I am focusing on. I am focusing on the digital stuff and how the laws apply to that.
I do have enough information from witnesses that say CP could be a potential concern because they may have been underage when nudes were sent OR when nudes were requested/demanded/blackmailed. For instance, if he solicited and obtained nudes from a minor who resided in the US at the time of transmission, he's completely f*cked for 2 or 3 things: 1. solicitation of a minor (something something sexual stuff...forget the actual charge), 2. distribution and 3. possession of CP, in the US, and I highly doublt the UK would ignore an extradition request for something like that. Also, the UK would be the one that charges for hte possession stuff but the US could charge for the distribution and solicitation stuff. Holy f*ck, do you think AC realizes how serious business his actions were? This is "federal pound me in the ass" prison level stuff.
By my count, fact count 2. I only made 3 factual clarifications so it has to stay at 3.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the bro-shield has obviously increased by 1 bro.
I don't even know what this means. For whom? Renegade? TE? Neither? Both? Someone else? I can see a case being made for TE because I said he's calling out the bullshit in this thread, not white knighting Renegade. This is easy to clear up: just as TE. If he agrees with me, I was right and fact count stays at 2. If he disagrees, fact count moves to 1.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
oh well, i did enjoy the serenity our brief ceasefire.
It can still remain as such. We, too, can end this discussion in just 2 posts depending on what you say next. You did not really make any factually incorrect statements: you just focused your replies on stuf that may not have been the best of places (such as on Sarah's age or on the blackmail aspect of this issue).
You're about to have your anus badly ravaged Slay. There is not a single person on this site so intimately aware of what constitutes as a "pedophile" (You can speculate on why that is).
Nothing described about AC, or dadudemon, or Sorgo, would point to them being pedophiles. You're ignorant if you believe that is the case.
dadudemon is right. 👆
And don't bring me this "broshield" shit. I've given dadudemon and Sorgo more shit before the AC thread than almost any of you (PVS probably has me beaten in terms of tossing shit at dadudemon).
Originally posted by Slay
Of course this could also be why DDM is being so weird about the ''pedophile'' issue:Damn those 14 year olds looking like they're 25-27! Right? RIGHT!?
Edit: Also note his use of the words ''thought experiment''.
the best part:
She clearly knew what she was doing and that made her seem creepy, imo...