Originally posted by Sancty
2 of the girls involved were 14... not sure whether that will interest you ddm bc I'm not sure if they were "smoking hot" or not
well technically its hebophobia, so slay chose the wrong word...which means it's been a huge mistake and everyone is innocent and we should just stop discussing the topic altogether /broshield
Originally posted by Slay
Can't believe I'm saying this, but it's ridiculous that PVS is getting shit for calling out Sorgo. Of course DDM would say anything to be discordant but man, you're almost starting to sound like AC, the pedophile's advocate.Those battle rap guys are right, this place is filled with sick ****s.
Yes, how dare I stick to DSM-V when labeling pathologies. How utterly f*cking sick of me. I should be thoroughly ashamed for correcting people's improper use of "pedophilia" and hebephilia" in this thread. What ever will I do?
Originally posted by Slay
Of course this could also be why DDM is being so weird about the ''pedophile'' issue:Damn those 14 year olds looking like they're 25-27! Right? RIGHT!?
Edit: Also note his use of the words ''thought experiment''.
Your petty attempt to disparage me when I was the one being duped in that situation by a young lady is not only dumb, but it is a little bit sick.
Additionally, you're not even close to using "pedophile" correctly, by this point. If someone looks 25-27, and you find them attractive, and so does most everyone else, there is literally nothing wrong with you.
Slay, you're bored, I get it. But if you want to direct you boredom my direction, I will rip you a new one and make you feel small. You should probably go back to listening to prog rock and think about how awesome you are.
Originally posted by dadudemon
From my perspective, you've been 38 for years. That reminds me of menopausal women starting to feel mortal and amazingly always turning 29, every single year. Not calling you a liar, but it seems like you should have been well into your 40s by this point. No, I am not confusing you for Robtard. But if you are really 39 (I have no idea how TE knew that), my bad.
Robtard is 40 and will be 41 next month.
Originally posted by NemeBro
You're about to have your anus badly ravaged Slay. There is not a single person on this site so intimately aware of what constitutes as a "pedophile" (You can speculate on why that is).Nothing described about AC, or dadudemon, or Sorgo, would point to them being pedophiles. You're ignorant if you believe that is the case.
dadudemon is right. 👆
And don't bring me this "broshield" shit. I've given dadudemon and Sorgo more shit before the AC thread than almost any of you (PVS probably has me beaten in terms of tossing shit at dadudemon).
Also I understand that pedophile is a term used to describe people who are sexually attracted to children before they've shown any signs of puberty rather than just minors in general, but really that's just arguing about semantics to obfuscate the fact that there's no justifying AC or Sorgo's behaviour.
Then again, arguing semantics to obfuscate facts is one of DDM's favourite pastimes.
Originally posted by Sancty
2 of the girls involved were 14... not sure whether that will interest you ddm bc I'm not sure if they were "smoking hot" or not
I'm pretty sure they didn't look 25-27 and they were not trying to trick a full grown man, who was married, and with children. In fact, I think the implication you made may have taken this conversation in the wrong direction and you're now inadvertently making AC looks innocent.
"He didn't know they were under age because they looked 25."
That's definitely not applicable to this scenario.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the best part:
Here's how you determine how creepy some actions are: switch the ages and see if the older person seems creepy: yup.
I find nothing amusing or even cute about a 14 year old, regardless of their gender, trying to trick and adult who is married with children, into a sexual relationship. I, in fact, find it disgusting and borderline creepy.
Originally posted by Bardock42All right, I'll try to actually answer your ill-thought out white knighting of your girlfriend.
And, yet, here I was, not thinking she was creepy just cause 19/20 year old me liked her...
Sancty was pointing out that two of the girls AC harassed were 14. Why? Presumably to point out how creepy he was being, and then her comment afterwards was presumably an attempt to disparage dadudemon (A redundant effort, we all know that guy's a ******!). It didn't address dadudemon's finding the girl "creepy" (Which he's explained well-enough,and it shouldn't be difficult to see his point of view), only that he found the girl "smoking hot", so your entire response to me was completely worthless. Anyway, about the 14 year old thing...
She herself started going out with you about the same age. It's hypocritical to condemn one man for being attracted to a 14 year old girl yet not another man. Indeed, I actually found your OP in the AC thread a little weird and hypocritical on one subject. Namely the "Many of these girls were underage part". I was like,"Hold on? Wasn't Sancty just as old as these girls AC tried to take advantage of?"
Am I missing something? I mean sure, AC is scummy for a lot of reasons, but the condemnation of him from you and Sancty for liking 14 year old girls in of itself is odd. But you might say,"Wait! I didn't harass and use psychological manipulation with Sancty! She was mature and shit!" Sure, I'd probably agree. 👆 Like dadudemon I see nothing wrong with being attracted to a developed girl who happens to be 14, and if they also have the mental fortitude to handle adult relationships then it is fine. 👆
But why bring up the age of AC's victims at all if you don't find anything inherently wrong with dating a 14 year old girl? Is there some information I am not privy to?
Originally posted by Slay
Not claiming ddm is a pedophile. I'm saying he's probably more uncomfortable with being attracted to a 14 year old than he's willing to admit, which is probably why he's playing devil's advocate regarding AC who did in fact solicit nudes form underage girls, which is definitely something a pedophile would do.Also I understand that pedophile is a term used to describe people who are sexually attracted to children before they've shown any signs of puberty rather than just minors in general, but really that's just arguing about semantics to obfuscate the fact that there's no justifying AC or Sorgo's behaviour.
Then again, arguing semantics to obfuscate facts is one of DDM's favourite pastimes.
No, I am perfectly comfortable being attracted to fully sexually mature females. That's normal. It would be abnormal for a straight male such as myself to not be. My problem was with her age and decpetion (and, perhaps, the fact that I was married, she knew I was married, and knew my wife, personally).
Originally posted by Slay
...which is definitely something a pedophile would do.
In the US? Sure. That legal definition for pedophile includes doing stuff with minors up until 17 years and 364 days. Some of the US Laws are very stupid and have no semblance to modernity in the medical and psychological communities. You'd never convince a psychologist that a 20 year old, who had sex with a 17 year old, is a criminal or even abnormal. But that does not stop cases from making it into courts. 😐
Let's be clear that this has nothing to do with what AC did and you're now moving the discussion to irrelevant topics. 🙂
Remember, I'm the one that likes to play word games and argue semantics, right? dur
Originally posted by dadudemon
I'm pretty sure they didn't look 25-27 and they were not trying to trick a full grown man, who was married, and with children. In fact, I think the implication you made may have taken this conversation in the wrong direction and you're now inadvertently making AC looks innocent."He didn't know they were under age because they looked 25."
That's definitely not applicable to this scenario.
Here's how you determine how creepy some actions are: switch the ages and see if the older person seems creepy: yup.
I find nothing amusing or even cute about a 14 year old, regardless of their gender, trying to trick and adult who is married with children, into a sexual relationship. I, in fact, find it disgusting and borderline creepy.
Originally posted by dadudemon
You'd never convince a psychologist that a 20 year old, who had sex with a 17 year old, is a criminal or even abnormal.
That's not even remotely close to what I described as the behaviour of a pedophile though.
Remember, I'm the one that likes to move discussions to irrelevant topics, right? dur
Originally posted by SlayHe's not even ****ing playing devil's advocate, lol. He condemned AC when he found out what he and I did when I was a little girl in France. Also, a pedophile would generally speaking be aiming a bit south of 14 years old. 👆
Not claiming ddm is a pedophile. I'm saying he's probably more uncomfortable with being attracted to a 14 year old than he's willing to admit, which is probably why he's playing devil's advocate regarding AC who did in fact solicit nudes form underage girls, which is definitely something a pedophile would do.Also I understand that pedophile is a term used to describe people who are sexually attracted to children before they've shown any signs of puberty rather than just minors in general, but really that's just arguing about semantics to obfuscate the fact that there's no justifying AC or Sorgo's behaviour.
Then again, arguing semantics to obfuscate facts is one of DDM's favourite pastimes.
Well first of all, no one is justifying AC's behavior. Except Blax, but he's subhuman and thus easily ignored. Sorgo also IIRC didn't look at any underage girls with AC, per his word. "Wait!", you might say. "Why should we believe his word?" Well, probably because the only evidence signifying that his "research" even took place is his word, lol.
Calm down.