Originally posted by abhilegendBusiek even said on his own board the fight could have went either way. The fight and the dialogue clearly supported that as well, sport.
That's not what happened snake-eyes. But you've been in denial for ten years now, why stop now.🙂
It was a decisive win and Busiek pretty much hit it on our head that even with mjolnir Thor had no chance of winning in a CQC fight. He made it clear in the deluxe hardcover version of JLA/Avengers that Superman was more powerful than Thor.
Originally posted by Star428
So, it's ok for Thor fans to use handbooks but if a Superman fan uses JLA/Avengers they get banned... Gotcha.
This phucking thread is about DCNU Superman vs Thor in h2h only, with speed equalized 😐
It has NOTHING, LITERALLY NOTHING to do with the crossover or preboot Superman.
Originally posted by Star428
So, it's ok for Thor fans to use handbooks but if a Superman fan uses JLA/Avengers they get banned... Gotcha.
You could have just looked at the rules thread.
No Non-canon Sources
Non-canon sources are invalid for evidence. With rare exceptions, comics not in continuity such as Elseworlds, What Ifs, or alternate universes are not used for evidence in debates of a particular mainstream character.A canon source is one that is regarded as being 'in continuity'. In the example of Star Trek; instances from the series and movies can be used, but books are definitely out. Comic book crossovers are usually unusable as they ignore common sense most of the time (DC vs. Marvel is certainly unusable in some cases in our debates!).
This includes JLA/Avengers. Canon or not, people just aren't going to agree on it in most cases. Besides, there should be plenty of other comics with which to make your point.
Originally posted by Star428You should spend less time making faulty comparisons, and more time reading the rules.
So, it's ok for Thor fans to use handbooks but if a Superman fan uses JLA/Avengers they get banned... Gotcha.
Originally posted by Badabing
[QUOTE=9388817]Originally posted by Digi
[B]Debating Format
[b]No Non-canon Sources
Non-canon sources are invalid for evidence. With rare exceptions, comics not in continuity such as Elseworlds, What Ifs, or alternate universes are not used for evidence in debates of a particular mainstream character.A canon source is one that is regarded as being 'in continuity'. In the example of Star Trek; instances from the series and movies can be used, but books are definitely out. Comic book crossovers are usually unusable as they ignore common sense most of the time (DC vs. Marvel is certainly unusable in some cases in our debates!).
This includes JLA/Avengers. Canon or not, people just aren't going to agree on it in most cases. Besides, there should be plenty of other comics with which to make your point.
Comics released strictly online or on web sites will not be considered proof in the Comic Book Versus Forum.
An obscure interview given by someone involved in a story arc is not proof to refute feats. Neither is a random post by a supposed writer on a message board, blogs, tweets, etc. There have been too many of these so called interviews which go against what's shown on panel. Especially when there is no dialogue to refute what's happening on panel. Most writers are clear with the intentions of the plot and story arc.
This principle extends to characters with multiple versions, alternate timelines, etc. Unless specified by the thread starter, only current-version canon feats are allowed. [/B]
Anyway, cross-overs are not used as proof here. [/B][/QUOTE]I'm going to assume you now realize how wrong you were and accept the rules as stated. 👆
Originally posted by quanchi112That's BullSh** I read over 100 pgs in the DC site where KB was answering fans question concerning JLA/Avengers nowhere does he state what you claim.
Busiek even said on his own board the fight could have went either way. The fight and the dialogue clearly supported that as well, sport.
Originally posted by shadowknightNo it is more of the fact people had been told about the rules of the thread and are choosing to ignore them.
So basically when you are losing a basketball game, you cry to referee to stop Shaq from squoring on you because he's too tall to block. Gotchaa!
Thus temp bannings which Bada can do or thread closings something I can do could be needed.
So your analogy should go more along the lines of one of the players is deciding to not dribble the ball while they move around, has been warned and refuses to comply with the rules. So you either stop the game or eject the player.
If you have any more questions on the rules feel free to PM me.