Originally posted by Quincy
Do you consider that the person who wishes to simply remain friends with someone who wants to date them MORE selfish and Narcisstic than somebody who refuses to be friends with someone who won't date them?
I consider the rhetoric of this question to represent a strawman perspective of my position so I will disregard a direct address of this question, altogether.
Instead, I will state a second time: I think a person should be allowed to not waste time on someone he or she does not want to waste time without being labeled "a dick." Also, the selfishness comes into play in the following way:
Selfish:
"lacking consideration for others; concerned chiefly with one's own personal profit or pleasure."
Example: "I do not like this person in a romantic manner but this person likes me in a romantic manner. I want this person to remain in my life as a friend regardless of their feelings or how being around me might make them feel."
A person should not be expected to "just be friends" with someone they do not want to be friends with and they should be allowed to move on to other romantic relationships without being considered "a dick" for making a mature emotional decisions.
Also, your question, itself, is malformed. You either intentionally or unintentionally moved the goalposts. You used the word "remain." "Let's just be friends" does not mean the same thing "let's remain as friends." If you were friends, prior, then someone or both started the relationship in a romantic direction, and then someone wanted to not take it that direction, the option to "remain as friends" is open. Regardless, no one should get a "dick" label if they decide to end the friendship. Ending the relationship, altogether, is not dickish. It is how you go about doing so that makes you a dick.
Lastly, your question is adding motives to the situation I was describing that were not there, before. This is also a strawman. You stated, "...than somebody who refuses to be friends with someone who won't date them?" You're adding a stipulation that I did not. Since when did I state that this hypothetical person is "refusing" to be friends? Did I not state or imply exactly what I meant when I agreed with Newjack? He said the following:
"Or perhaps the person not wanting to be just friends is doing it because they have developed strong feelings and they know they will slowly build resentment over time because of it. That person leaving I don't think 8s being childish. Perhaps all they decided is that they have limited time..."
That's not the same thing as "refusing to be friends."
If you want to talk about degrees of selfishness, be my guest: that's not a topic I have entertained.
TL : DR - You're moving the goalposts as I haven't been talking about "remaining" friends and people who "refuse" to be friends. I'm pretty sure you're familiar enough with my argumentation style that you knew something like that would not work with me.
Edit - I was inclined to reword your question for you to keep it more contextual:
Do you consider the person who suggests being friends with a someone who wants to pursue a romantic relationship to be MORE selfish and narcissistic than somebody who decides they cannot be friends with someone they want to pursue a romantic relationship?
The answer to that question is: "It is unanswerable because specifics are missing that allow a value judgment to be made on the question. What are the motivations for the person to want become friends? What are the motivations for the person who decides that being friends cannot work for them?"