Wind Waker or Skyward Sword ?

Started by quanchi1125 pages
quanchi112 Disney

Wind Waker or Skyward Sword ?

Which one do you want to see take on Dracula and the gang ?

Sacred 117 Noble Al-LIE
Originally posted by quanchi112
Which one do you want to see take on Dracula and the gang ?

"The gang?" (Sorry. Haven't actually played through LoS/LoP; only seen some of it.)

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Sacred 117
"The gang?" (Sorry. Haven't actually played through LoS/LoP; only seen some of it.)
Which game is greater in terms of a Hylian forces/army ?

The Scenario Greater Sci-Fi combatant

There are no Hyrule forces in Wind Waker and Skyward Sword is a prequel that takes place before Hyrule existed.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by The Scenario
There are no Hyrule forces in Wind Waker and Skyward Sword is a prequel that takes place before Hyrule existed.
Which game offers the better chance to take on Los ?

ScreamPaste Carpe Noctem

I'm just going to be honest and say you should play WW for the sole reason that it's shorter.

Spoiler:
And less difficult.

But yeah, there's no "Hyrule" in either game, lol.

The Scenario Greater Sci-Fi combatant

Depends on whether you allow Ganondorf's/Ghirahim's forces. They're the only ones with an actual army in those games. As for individuals, WW Link is better equipped to fight Gabriel than SS Link is, in my opinion.

Though I imagine Wind Waker's setting will play hell with Lords of Shadows' forces.

Sacred 117 Noble Al-LIE

If we're talking armies, then it wouldn't matter anyways, seeing as LoZ is implicitly a power of individuals.

Sacred 117 Noble Al-LIE
Originally posted by The Scenario
As for individuals, WW Link is better equipped to fight Gabriel than SS Link is, in my opinion.

Curious, what makes you say this?

The Scenario Greater Sci-Fi combatant
Originally posted by Sacred 117
Curious, what makes you say this?

Magic, mostly. Light Arrows vs. vampire, for instance. He's physically stronger than SS Link thanks to the Power Bracelets, and is one of the most durable Links in the series. Plus the Master Sword has a pretty good feat in Wind Waker.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by The Scenario
Depends on whether you allow Ganondorf's/Ghirahim's forces. They're the only ones with an actual army in those games. As for individuals, WW Link is better equipped to fight Gabriel than SS Link is, in my opinion.

Though I imagine Wind Waker's setting will play hell with Lords of Shadows' forces.

Yes, as it would allow for all characters in the games to combat each other. I was going to do a multi game thread with Tp tagging with one other game in a massive armies vs. armies type scenario thread.

quanchi112 Disney

Also which is the better game iyo. Rank the zelda games in terms of enjoy ability.

Sacred 117 Noble Al-LIE
Originally posted by The Scenario
Magic, mostly. Light Arrows vs. vampire, for instance. He's physically stronger than SS Link thanks to the Power Bracelets, and is one of the most durable Links in the series. Plus the Master Sword has a pretty good feat in Wind Waker.

I guess you could say that, but

Spoiler:
SkyLink did have the completed Triforce before PIS.

ScreamPaste Carpe Noctem

Including armies in Zelda is honestly weird, since as Sacred said, individuals > armies in Zelda.

No, but you can beat WW in a single day, and it is much easier. I'm concerned, given how long you've taken to beat OoT, that you might not be able to handle SS' constant puzzles. The entire overworld is littered with them.

ScreamPaste Carpe Noctem
Originally posted by Sacred 117
I guess you could say that, but
Spoiler:
SkyLink did have the completed Triforce before PIS.
Yes, but he
Spoiler:
left it behind during the final fight, for some reason, lol. Besides, Quan would have to be stupid to allow the complete triforce.
Sacred 117 Noble Al-LIE
Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Yes, but he
Spoiler:
left it behind during the final fight, for some reason, lol. Besides, Quan would have to be stupid to allow the complete triforce.

That's kinda what I was referring to.

The Scenario Greater Sci-Fi combatant
Originally posted by Sacred 117
I guess you could say that, but

True, but quan tends to disallow that kind of thing. Same reason he doesn't want TP Ganondorf covering everything in twilight. It's "unfair" or something, I don't recall exactly what he's said.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Including armies in Zelda is honestly weird, since as Sacred said, individuals > armies in Zelda.

No, but you can beat WW in a single day, and it is much easier. I'm concerned, given how long you've taken to beat OoT, that you might not be able to handle SS' constant puzzles. The entire overworld is littered with them.

One spot stumped me and I haven't attempted to play it again in years. Skyward sword intrigues me more since there is no Ganon. I hate the motion sensory crap though.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by The Scenario
True, but quan tends to disallow that kind of thing. Same reason he doesn't want TP Ganondorf covering everything in twilight. It's "unfair" or something, I don't recall exactly what he's said.
Los has its own ways of easily winning but that isn't an invasion thread which is the sole purpose of the thread.

ScreamPaste Carpe Noctem

Originally posted by quanchi112
One spot stumped me and I haven't attempted to play it again in years. Skyward sword intrigues me more since there is no Ganon. I hate the motion sensory crap though.
Honestly the Motion Plus was crazily well implemented and I loved it, I'm sad it won't be coming back. But meh. GC controller in WW.