Originally posted by Skybreaker2
Wrong. Ant jumped into this thread on page 3 without warning. And I already addressed your claim that I jumped in guns blazing; you ignored my argument and just restated your contention in different wording.
You're quite fortunate that your posts were deleted, i could point to many instances where you insulted users unnecessarily, Ant has done it as well, however not to such a degree, I have done it as well(again, sorry about Freshestslice) but not to such a degree, there's a fine line between getting a little heated and being an ass.
That's the problem; your entire reply here was all rhetoric, no substance, because you restated everything originally in different wording and didn't address any of my counterarguments.
You're counter-argument is childs play for me, "blunt" insults are no better than passive-aggressive insults. Yet instead, you misunderstood the situation and the text that DarthAnt66 presented and[you] took it in a different meaning. You failed to see the "true" meaning behind the text. Is that all? or will you continue to grasp for straws?
You're pathetic. You insulted me in your original post. Oh, wait, when you do it, you're just playing Mommy Mod, but when I do it back, I'm "insulting" you? How are you going to phrase this? That you were just "warning" me, while I was "insulting" you? 🙄 [/B]
you are simply justifying your actions, I simply stated i grew tired of your childish actions and warned you to either cease hostilities or be banned. How do you justify calling me pathetic? when yesterday i asked for peace? when i only stated my annoyance with you? Did i attack you personally? did i insult you?
My point; you ignored several points that I made in my reply. You ignored my point about the distinction between blunt and passive-aggressive speech. You ignored my chronology on the instigator of the events. You come back and basically give a rhetorically pleasing, pandering reply that sort-of-relates to what was being said, but you don't do a point-by-point rebuttal.
Was Darthant66 the one who came into KMC and the first thing he did was start insutling everyone who disagreed with him? *******? ****ing pathetic? do those ring a bell sweetheart? because you used them. also as for your Passive Aggressive/Blunt speech argument i have answered that above.
This is worse than "insulting"; it's intellectually dishonest. You come in high and mighty to attack a poster, and then decide to play politics rather than engage in real debate. Real debates involve addressing arguments, not making vague rhetorical replies.
A "Real" debater would not need to resort to such childish insults and comments. You speak so high and mighty, but I have question for you, one that you had for me in your PM to me
" How do you defend your hypocrisy? No, you won't, because you don't even remotely practice what you preach."
Perhaps i should end it, with how you end your PMs to me.
"Pathetic"