World Breaker Hulk vs Super Boy Prime

Started by DarkSaint8530 pages
Originally posted by carver9
So we debate only off high showings? Let me know because if that's the case, Thanos can't hurt Superman or Gladiator. Not with any of his attacks and Kang sucks.

What does the Full Capacity rule mean to you?

Full Capacity
It is assumed that each contestant will fight to his/her best ability, but still within the character's personality, unless specified otherwise.

...

It is also assumed that the characters fight at their optimum levels of ability - not explicitly weakened or unusually powered up for those who have variable power levels.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
What does the Full Capacity rule mean to you?

Thanks for the help, will remember this. About to pop open that Gladiator vs Thanos thread. You do agree Gladiator can't be harmed by Thanos, correct and that Doomsday can't put a scratch on Hyperion? Want to make sure we are on the same page.

Originally posted by carver9
Thanks for the help, will remember this. About to pop open that Gladiator vs Thanos thread. You do agree Gladiator can't be harmed by Thanos, correct and that Doomsday can't put a scratch on Hyperion? Want to make sure we are on the same page.
Originally posted by carver9
Thanks for the help, will remember this. About to pop open that Gladiator vs Thanos thread. You do agree Gladiator can't be harmed by Thanos, correct and that Doomsday can't put a scratch on Hyperion? Want to make sure we are on the same page.

Gladiator/Thanos: Thanos' best feats > Gladiator😈

Doomsday/Hyperion: Hyperion only held two planets apart for a milisecond, until they crumbled under his fists. Its a durability showing, sure, as it shows that Hyperion> rock and soil. But we already knew that.😈

But, all kidding aside, you didn't answer the question. What does the Full Capacity rule mean for you? A genuine question.

Originally posted by carver9
The shortest nap in existence?

Never said he was KO'd for an extended period of time.

And thank you for your scan. 😂
Not only was he beat up before having to go 1v2 against amped Hulk and Thing, he was also severely disadvantaged with the gaping wound he has been carrying around for ages.

Originally posted by carver9


Makes your stance on Thor exhausting himself solely on smacking around amped Hulk that much more foolish.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Gladiator/Thanos: Thanos' best feats > Gladiator😈

Doomsday/Hyperion: Hyperion only held two planets apart for a milisecond, until they crumbled under his fists. Its a durability showing, sure, as it shows that Hyperion> rock and soil. But we already knew that.😈

But, all kidding aside, you didn't answer the question. What does the Full Capacity rule mean for you? A genuine question.

It means that we debate using nothing but high showings. Using nothing but high showings and not averages. With that said, since we debate entirely off of high showings, you or anyone else would have to provide proof that Thanos could dish out solar system destroying blasts or punches (you know, that's the post you are agreeing with...his argument is, Prime can't be hurt by Hulk since he withstood a Universe busting attack. That's when you chimed in using the best of his ability argument). Then you would need to provide proof that Doomsday can dish out Universe busting attacks against Hyperion. Doesn't matter how many times it was done, we are using the best of his ability argument. That is Hyperion and Gladiator's best. Let me know if we are on the same page. Trying to bump this thread.

Originally posted by carver9
The scan tells us why he died. He was meant to die in that battle as it was prophecy. Nothing was shown as it being the wound unless again, you have proof.

I have proof of something though. As I stated, the wound is the reason Thor came back to life. It helped him. If the wound wasn't there, he would still be dead.

Please provide proof backing your claims. Scan even tells you how Thor died.

Are. You. Serious?

Where does it say the wound brought him back to life?

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Never said he was KO'd for an extended period of time.

And thank you for your scan. 😂
Not only was he beat up before having to go 1v2 against amped Hulk and Thing, he was also severely disadvantaged with the gaping wound he has been carrying around for ages.

Makes your stance on Thor exhausting himself solely on smacking around amped Hulk that much more foolish.

Lol...but a single panel didn't pass though.

Uuuummmm, nothing in that scan states he was weakened or at a disadvantage.

😐

We already knew the wound was there.

Originally posted by Khazra Reborn
Are. You. Serious?

Where does it say the wound brought him back to life?

He disappeared into the rift space/time he bore in his side. If the rift/wound wasn't there, Thor would've remained dead. SMH.

Originally posted by carver9
Lol...but a single panel didn't pass though.

Uuuummmm, nothing in that scan states he was weakened or at a disadvantage.

😐

We already knew the wound was there.


Oh gawd no..

facepalm

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Oh gawd no..

facepalm

😂

Originally posted by carver9
😂

So a severely disadvantaged Thor still beat amped Hulk and amped Thing!

👆

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
So a severely disadvantaged Thor still beat amped Hulk and amped Thing!

👆

Not at a disadvantage but he did beat Thing and bfred Nul by beating him. I agree.

Originally posted by carver9
Not at a disadvantage but he did beat Thing and bfred Nul by beating him. I agree.

Don't worry. It's not that bad. Even though he just fought a small army of Serpent's goons, was blasted/bfred by a skyfather, and had a huge gaping wound the whole time, at least we know Thor was willing to kill. 🙂

Wan't a hug?

I think I have read now everything, a char who has a painful wound is not at an disadvantage...

Originally posted by carver9
Not at a disadvantage but he did beat Thing and bfred Nul by beating him. I agree.

Take the LOSS. Its ok to be admit defeat

Haha the raping of carver

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Don't worry. It's not that bad. Even though he just fought a small army of Serpent's goons, was blasted/bfred by a skyfather, and had a huge gaping wound the whole time, at least we know Thor was willing to kill. 🙂

Wan't a hug?

Lol...I know of everything you've just said and not once did we see Thor at a disadvantage. Gaping wound?

I remember the fight against the Goons. They really didn't do anything to Thor. The bfr when he hit the ground did bust his lip. He's a high Herald, I feel safe at saying he could take much more than that. Especially with him only being hit twice in that fight.

He did beat them though. Used Mjlonir against Thing and Bfred Hulk.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
Take the LOSS. Its ok to be admit defeat

Defeat of what?

Originally posted by Prof. T.C McAbe
I think I have read now everything, a char who has a painful wound is not at an disadvantage...

Are you sure you want to go there?