Originally posted by Stigma
The thing is that Savage tagged Sidious precisely because Sheev was toying with him.
A fool Sidious fanboy claimed that Sidious toyed with them, and this shit still goes on.
Dave Filoni, Supervising Director of TCW, right handman of Lucas and now Director of Rebels said this ;
''He puts up a better fight than jedi council did.''
Link below ;
http://www.starwars.com/video/wrath-of-the-sith
Really, this stupidity of comparing high level beings with Saesee Tiin and Agen Kolar needs to stop. There is a reason that these guys are featless in new canon. They are suck ass.
Even Kit Fisto is not at Savage's level in terms of dueling skill (due to his style shii-cho), and he deflected 3 attack from Sidious.
Originally posted by Marco1907
A fool Sidious fanboy claimed that Sidious toyed with them, and this shit still goes on.
The Tempest is still a noob, but that duel lasted about as long as Sidious wanted it to. It was pretty f*cking clear when Sidious wanted to kill Savage, and Savage was dead 5 seconds afterwards. Sidious didn't have a gridlock with the two until one of them made a mistake or left an opening; he just killed them with ease at the time of his own choosing.
Originally posted by Skybreaker
The Tempest is still a noob, but that duel lasted about as long as Sidious wanted it to. It was pretty f*cking clear when Sidious wanted to kill Savage, and Savage was dead 5 seconds afterwards. Sidious didn't have a gridlock with the two until one of them made a mistake or left an opening; he just killed them with ease at the time of his own choosing.
Yeah, I think that is why Savage and Maul gave two physical hit to Sidious, because he wanted to take those.
Originally posted by Skybreaker
The Tempest is still a noob, but that duel lasted about as long as Sidious wanted it to. It was pretty f*cking clear when Sidious wanted to kill Savage, and Savage was dead 5 seconds afterwards. Sidious didn't have a gridlock with the two until one of them made a mistake or left an opening; he just killed them with ease at the time of his own choosing.
No.
Originally posted by DARTH POWER
No.
It's not as though Palpatine had the two immobilized and pinned to the wall and just let them fall and draw their lightsabers, or anything. 🙄
Originally posted by Marco1907
Yeah, I think that is why Savage and Maul gave two physical hit to Sidious, because he wanted to take those.
And those physical hits did...what to Sidious again?
Originally posted by Skybreaker
It's not as though Palpatine had the two [b]immobilized and pinned to the wall and just let them fall and draw their lightsabers, or anything. 🙄[/B]
It's not like Sidious KO'd Yoda with FL, but then just let him get back up, recover, attack him back and draw out his Lightsaber or anything 😬 Sidious can be a cocky s***. However even in ROTS he never takes out his Sabers until his Opponent(s) do first. He's always given his opponents the opportunity to do that.
But that's all different to claiming the whole Saber fight was just a charade which Sidious could have stopped any second he wanted.
He kicked their asses anyway, so I don't see why people can't just accept the ass kicking we were given, but insist on making it even worse for the poor Maul bros than it already was 🙁
Originally posted by DARTH POWER
It's not like Sidious KO'd Yoda with FL, but then just let him get back up, recover and attack him back 😬 Sidious can be a cocky s***. However even in ROTS he never takes out his Sabers until his Opponent(s) do first. He's always given his opponents the opportunity to do that.
This is something of a non-sequitur in that it really doesn't address the point at all nor is it really relevant to it.
Originally posted by DARTH POWER
Really? 😬
Seriously. What you said does nothing to refute or contradict his point. All you've established is that Sidious probably could have killed Yoda a hell of a lot quicker if he wasn't cocky.
But beyond that, quickly zapping Yoda isn't equitable to leisurely pinning Maul and Opress, resisting their efforts to escape, and releasing them of their own accord.