Exar Kun vs. General Grievous.

Started by The Merchant8 pages

Exar Kun vs. General Grievous.

Saber fight only, who takes this?

Grievous, since this is saber fight only. If it's the Force is allowed I think Exar Kun wins.

Grievous.

A lot of people try to lowball Grievous by saying that he got beaten by Fisto, Koth (which he didn't), Gungans, and Ventress. These fights were all before his peak though. At his peak Grievous was throwing down with Windu, Maul, and peak Obi-wan, so I'm leaning Grievous.

I'll roll with the Dark Lord.

I wonder if TCW Grievous has any good feats in the novel adaptations of the episodes or the webcomics...

Peharps grievous, But exar kun often changing fighting styles and he is really bitchy, but gonna to stand with grievous.
Exaar Kun> Malak in ligth saber fighting style but If it was Malak for tactical meaning I would say malak, because as obiwan he could have dodge grievous attack while being close and cut his hands..
Really don't know if Exar Kun can...

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
I'll roll with the Dark Lord.

I don't see how Kun could defeat Grievous in any kind of physical manner.

Mee to but I'm convince than he can.
I'm pretty sure than he can I don't see how... But I'm pretty sure... I just don't see How. But he can. I'm pretty sure. I'm sure so sure, but I cannot proove it.
I'm pretty sure than he can I don't see how... But I'm pretty sure... I just don't see How. But he can. I'm pretty sure. I'm sure so sure, but I cannot proove it.
I'm pretty sure than he can I don't see how... But I'm pretty sure... I just don't see How. But he can. I'm pretty sure. I'm sure so sure, but I cannot proove it.

Pure sabers Grievous like overwhelms him.

DOes I need to recalll than Exaar Kun is also a pure light saber combatant in his Niman....

Kun wins with high difficulty.

Originally posted by ILS
I don't see how Kun could defeat Grievous in any kind of physical manner.

My new appreciation for Ulic Qel-Droma's own skill puts Kun above most PT/TCW characters.

😬

Originally posted by Emperordmb
A lot of people try to lowball Grievous by saying that he got beaten by Fisto, Koth (which he didn't), Gungans, and Ventress.

You're saying Koth didn't have the advantage over him until the Magnaguards joined in?

The magnaguards were clearly ordered to join in if Koth gains any kind of advantage and he did via Tk.

Even in Sabers Koth was fending off Grievous with a wounded arm. So yes Koth did very well in that fight given all of the advantages in Grievous's favor.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
These fights were all before his peak though. At his peak Grievous was throwing down with Windu, Maul, and peak Obi-wan, so I'm leaning Grievous.

Yes Grievous does do very well against all these high caliber Jedi/Sith in Pure Sabers. But they all defeated him with Tk.

What advantage did Eeth Koth have over Grievous aside from TKing him? And why would it detriment Grievous even if Koth was able to defeat him? Koth has no dueling showings outside of fighting Grievous - therefore Grievous' skill level would remain unchanged upon losing to Koth. It would be Koth who would be considered impressive.

And the point of Grievous using MagnaGuards on Koth was to capture him so he could send a message to the Jedi with Koth tied up. If he wanted to kill him he probably would have done so.

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
You're saying Koth didn't have the advantage over him until the Magnaguards joined in?

The magnaguards were clearly ordered to join in if Koth gains any kind of advantage and he did via Tk.

Even in Sabers Koth was fending off Grievous with a wounded arm. So yes Koth did very well in that fight given all of the advantages in Grievous's favor.

Yes Grievous does do very well against all these high caliber Jedi/Sith in Pure Sabers. But they all defeated him with Tk.


I feel your only goal and contribution on this forum is to try to hammer down on Luke and Grievous because of childhood tragedy experiences.

Kun