Maul defeated Qui-Gon, who for most the fight had aid from his accomplished apprentice. Qui-Gon was a Jedi Council Level Master, One of the Best swordsmen of his time, and possibly one of the best in the Orders history.He also defeated Anoon Bondara, whose Lightsaber skills were "second to none."
I'm aware of all of this, but a couple of clarifications.
Jinn was one of the best swordsmen the Jedi have ever produced, as per the TPM novel.
Bondara's skills weren't second to none. He is objectively inferior to both Windu and Jinn, as per Shadow Hunter and I believe another source. When someone is described as "unparalleled" in SW it's a blatant exaggeration, otherwise every Tom, Dick and Harry would be unparalleled....
If you think the "exhaustion" has been overstated, you need to go back to the episodes which makes specific mention of that both times Grievous beats Council Members. Opress on the other hand Eats Council Members for breakfast.
Throwing aside the pointless referencing of "Council Members" - because simply being on the council has nothing to do with your dueling skill...
It has been overstated. Yes, they were tired, but they weren't so exhausted that they needed to coddle up in a bacta tank otherwise they'd collapse from fatigue. They weren't quite 100%, but they were still more than capable of fighting and providing a challenge. Acting like their fatigue was the only reason Grievous bettered them is ridiculous.
Savage has never taken on five opponents simultaneously and bested them, nor has he ever dueled evenly with Mace Windu whilst at a disadvantage. He's never received the same level of skill accolades from Grievous, never pressured Dooku in a duel by merit of his own skill, never bested Asajj Ventress "handily" - he's an inferior combatant. I've made both his and Grievous' respect threads. Go to them, compare them. It's not difficult.
You say you're ignoring TCW Grievous. A bit odd don't you think considering 2 of the combatants are TCW Season 5 versions?
And what does this have to do with anything? They can be whatever versions they want - Grievous in the EU/ROTS novel, basically anywhere but TCW, is a magnificent lightsaber duelist and a physical behemoth. TCW is the only source which portrays him badly, and even then quite a lot of his losses there can be justified.
You keep going on about this bad ass EU Grievous, but none of that changes the fact that Kenobi Force TK smacked Grievous disarming him of his remaining weapons.If KENOBI does that, what possible difficulty are Maul/Opress going to have TK'ing him?
TPM Maul isn't as powerful as ROTS Kenobi, and Savage lacks precision. He also lacks the ability to deprive Grievous of two his sabers before Force attacking him, or keep up with Grievous substantially superior skill and speed in order to defeat him.
There's also the fact that recently SOD Maul BRF'd Grievous with telekinesis and failed to keep him down for the count.
If anything's overstated here it's Grievous's "weakness" to Kenobi's style. A style used by the majority of the Order.
You have an awesome way of debating. Anything that can be used against Grievous must be blown out of proportion, anything that can be used in favour of him is nigh-irrelevant, amirite?
Kenobi had a Form advantage which allowed him to overcome Grievous in ways other Jedi couldn't. Windu believed even himself couldn't have been a better choice for taking Grievous on due to the difference in lightsaber form, and evidently he isn't given Grievous' ability to stalemate him but lose to Kenobi. Unless you want to try and claim that Kenobi > Windu, which I think you'll find quite difficult.
And saying that a majority of the Order uses Soresu isn't an argument because 1) By that logic Grievous is still at a Form disadvantage against Soresu Users. And 2) Kenobi is the Order's foremost master of the Form, and is by feats one of the best duelists in the Order, above any other Soresu User of his era, so it's a moot point.
The best point you've brought up is Grievous's fight against Ventress and Durge. Of course Grievous had them at a distinct disadvantage there, given that they had no clue who he was, or what he was capable of, but he knew them both. And that's all kind of moot, since Ventress has defeated him 1 on 1 since then, without even resorting to using TK.
As opposed to all of your fantastic points......
He didn't have them at any real disadvantage once he confronted them directly, at which point he decapitated Durge and choked Ventress out after some resistance. And there is no evidence that Grievous knew them both, or at least he didn't know their combat abilities well at all due to never encountering them until this point. Again, you're exaggerating anything that will work in your favour, for whatever reason.
Ventress defeated TCW Grievous, who is a different version to the one in this thread, on a potent Dark Side nexus. Stop intermingling Grievous' feats from wildly different sources just to boost your argument.
And why exactly was it that Qui-Gon was exhausted? From fighting Maul.Why were the Jedi fighting Grievous exhausted? From fighting a Droid army prior to their engagement with Grievous.
Your point being? Maul didn't defeat Jinn either of the times he fought him until Jinn was tired - then Maul beat him. And Jinn has legitmate stamina issues due to being out of his physical prime, opposed to the Jedi Grievous fought who had been driven away after battling droids, which isn't quite as strenuous as fighting Darth Maul.
And the second time Shaak Ti fiought Grievous, she was again exhausted from having just fought like 20 Magnaguards.
Strawman - I wasn't even using that encounter as evidence for my case. Try again.