Voldemort vs McClane

Originally posted by Robtard
Squeezing a trigger faster than casting Crucio

MClane was married for years, so you fail again

Another: "No you!"

#mcclanewinsanotherthread

Yeah, he defeats him in far less time.

😂

Dummy.

You can't even say a pun correctly

"irony"

Originally posted by Robtard
You can't even say a pun correctly

"irony"

Originally posted by quanchi112
You failed to counter my points. Concession accepted.

Incorrect. You've yet to counter mine

How will Voldermort cast a spell when his face is a ruined mess due to bullets: Counter?

Originally posted by Robtard
Incorrect. You've yet to counter mine

How will Voldermort cast a spell when his face is a ruined mess due to bullets: Counter?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Mcclane has to aim and shoot. Voldemort flicks his wrist. Game over.

Quit being stupid.

That's not a counter: Voldermort won't be able to "flick his wrist" (Lolz, wrist flicker) when he has a face full of bullets. Counter?

"irony"

McClane puts a bullet in Voldy's brain. John has onscreen quickdraw reflexes and Rowling has officially stated that guns>wands. Tom dies hard.

Originally posted by Lestov16
McClane puts a bullet in Voldy's brain. John has onscreen quickdraw reflexes and Rowling has officially stated that guns>wands. Tom dies hard.

Originally posted by Robtard
That's not a counter: Voldermort won't be able to "flick his wrist" (Lolz, wrist flicker) when he has a face full of bullets. Counter?

"irony"

Common sense ftw.

Originally posted by quanchi112
To flick a wrist is far easier and faster than holding a gun up, aiming it, and firing.

Common sense ftw.

That's not a counter and you're wrong: Voldermort has to lift his frail hand, point the wand at his target and incant the spell; that's not faster than lifting a gun and squeezing a trigger, especially with the speed McClane's shown

Now do you have an actual counter, cos so far you've just conceded to me over and over and it's getting embarrassing for you

I think Voldemort is used to somebody pointing a dangerous weapon at him. That's like, the only way that combat occurs in Harry Potter.

Likewise, Voldemort has dueled against people without the need to cast spells verbally. So, his reaction time is just as prepared for John Mcclane pointing and firing a weapon at him.

I mean, holding a weapon and simply thinking it into operating is faster than someone physically having to operate it.

"Crucio" was the spelled named here that would end McClane, iirc it requires both the verbal and somatic components. Pointed - Flicking - Incantation

The only way to make this fair is to have Voldemort with his wand in hand, at his side, and McClane with Beretta in hand, at his side.

If this is the case, McClane can get off half a dozen shots before Voldy can utter a curse.

Hmm, guess that leaves out Crucio and instead he can use one of the other nonverbal spells capable of killing

Doesn't matter, Mac can fire from the hip and riddle Riddle with bullets before he even raises his wand.

Voldemort can do the same, though? There are nonverbal spells that require no aiming.

OK, name them.

http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Nonverbal_spell

Originally posted by Robtard
That's not a counter and you're wrong: Voldermort has to lift his frail hand, point the wand at his target and incant the spell; that's not faster than lifting a gun and squeezing a trigger, especially with the speed McClane's shown

Now do you have an actual counter, cos so far you've just conceded to me over and over and it's getting embarrassing for you

Common sense that flicking a wrist is far faster than moving your arm and hand while aiming at a target and firing away. You haveno common sense and have always been a ridiculous fanboy.

Originally posted by RJ 2.0
Doesn't matter, Mac can fire from the hip and riddle Riddle with bullets before he even raises his wand.