Voldemort vs McClane · Movie Versus Forum

Time Immemorial Restricted

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, he can't you toadey.

😆 😆 😆

RJ 2.0 The Grammanator

Originally posted by quanchi112
Voldemort has no issue lifting his hand. We see him easily flick his wrist before. McClane gets disarmed before he can fire. Points to Voldemort disarming Harry while Harry made the motion to attack first.
Common sense that flicking a wrist is far faster than moving your arm and hand while aiming at a target and firing away. You haveno common sense and have always been a ridiculous fanboy.

Explain what you think expelliarmus is.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by RJ 2.0
Explain what you think expelliarmus is.

Hush.

Five seconds in. That's how easy it is for the true dark lord.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UunqBAHBDo8

You used to have faith. You sicken me.

RJ 2.0 The Grammanator

Originally posted by quanchi112
Hush.
Five seconds in. That's how easy it is for the true dark lord.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UunqBAHBDo8
You used to have faith. You sicken me.

Mhm, it is a disarming spell. Now, name any and all items Voldemort used Expelliarmus on. Just wands, right?

Quincy Debaser

The Disarming Charm,[1] also known as the Expelliarmus Spell[4] or Disarming Spell[5] (Expelliarmus) was a defensive charm which forced the victim to release whatever they were holding at the time. It is common to see this spell used in duels, to make an opponent release their wand.[1]

RJ 2.0 The Grammanator

So, onscreen, what do we see the disarming spell working on? Just wands, right?

Quincy Debaser

Yep, wands. it's also a reflective curse against other damaging spells, and can knock out/knock back enemies

RJ 2.0 The Grammanator

Mhm. So, as far as disarming others goes, the disarming spell is only shown disarming and wielding wizards, correct?

Quincy Debaser

RJ, are you taking a really obnoxiously long time to build up to a mind-numbing argument in which expelliarmus wouldn't work on someone who wasn't a wizard or a wand?

Because if you are, just make your statement already so I can shut it down and move on

Darkstorm Zero Master of all Decepticons

Originally posted by Quincy
RJ, are you taking a really obnoxiously long time to build up to a mind-numbing argument in which expelliarmus wouldn't work on someone who wasn't a wizard or a wand?
Because if you are, just make your statement already so I can shut it down and move on

If you believe you know what he is driving at, then pre-emptively strike it down.

Lestov16 CTU Field Agent

Originally posted by Lestov16
McClane puts a bullet in Voldy's brain. John has onscreen quickdraw reflexes and Rowling has officially stated that guns>wands. Tom dies hard.

This

RJ 2.0 The Grammanator

Originally posted by Quincy
RJ, are you taking a really obnoxiously long time to build up to a mind-numbing argument in which expelliarmus wouldn't work on someone who wasn't a wizard or a wand?
Because if you are, just make your statement already so I can shut it down and move on

I am just trying to be very detailed.

Point is that the disarming spell only worked on objects that were magical, like wands. Never, not once, did it work on a gun.

Quincy Debaser

Actually that's not the case. Expelliarmus is a disarming spell. It's even been used to knock objects that weren't wands out of peoples hands - like books.

RJ 2.0 The Grammanator

I dont remember that, but I'll take your word for it.

Robtard Senor Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
Voldemort has no issue lifting his hand. We see him easily flick his wrist before.
McClane gets disarmed before he can fire. Points to Voldemort disarming Harry while Harry made the motion to attack first.
Common sense that flicking a wrist is far faster than moving your arm and hand while aiming at a target and firing away. You haveno common sense and have always been a ridiculous fanboy.

Glad to see that I've made you drop the "Crucio" argument /win

McClane can't be disarmed here; read the OP, you stupid idiot

So Voldermort goes to target McClane's gun, fails and gets a face full of bullets. This is ignoring that McClane is faster with a gun of course in the first place

#mcclaneconquersanotherthread

Quincy Debaser

Why can't he be disarmed? The OP said no transmuting or voldemort taking his gun.

Brah read the word things brah brah

Robtard Senor Member

Originally posted by Quincy
Why can't he be disarmed? The OP said no transmuting or voldemort taking his gun.
Brah read the word things brah brah

No worries, you're fairly new to the MVF so you're excused

Quincy Debaser

Oh well that's kind of you, at least. Thanks.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by RJ 2.0
Mhm, it is a disarming spell. Now, name any and all items Voldemort used Expelliarmus on. Just wands, right?

He can disarm in the same manner as simply moving like he did here. Bye bye gun, Johnny.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Robtard
Glad to see that I've made you drop the "Crucio" argument /win
McClane can't be disarmed here; read the OP, you stupid idiot
So Voldermort goes to target McClane's gun, fails and gets a face full of bullets. This is ignoring that McClane is faster with a gun of course in the first place
#mcclaneconquersanotherthread

That is just another way he easily wins.

Yes, he can disarm. He isn't taking it himself, angry short man.

Crucio, cutting spell, fireball, Avada Kedvara, etch.

Voldemort wins again.

😂